ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of A Single-Payer System

1350 Words6 Pages

battle between the two parties when dealing with health reform, what is best for the American people, and what will help lower the National Health Expenditure. The American people’s belief in government intervention is slowly deteriorating, and the future looks dim.
Single-Payer System
Single-payer national health insurance, none as “Medicare for all” is a single public or quasi-public agency that organizes health care financing, and delivery of care is in private hands (What is, 2016). Which means under the a single-payer system, all Americans will be covered for all medical services. The disappearance of premiums will occur, 95% of all households will save money, patients will not have co-pays and deductibles, and would regain free choice of doctors and hospitals (What is, 2016). The con’s in a single-payer health care system is; Higher taxes that is necessary to pay for single-payer, but would save the U.S. money; The United Kingdom and Canada are running into issue with the universal coverage dealing with finance, just like the U.S. when it comes to tremendous cost of new technologies and new expensive drugs; A form of rationing due to budget restrictions that create …show more content…

This will bring a surge of elderly people with functional and cognitive limitations; Functional limitations- physical problems that limit a person’s ability to perform routine daily activities; Cognitive limitations- losses in mental acuity that may also restrict a person’s ability to perform such activities (Wiener, J. M., 2013). Long- term care services are going to grow in the next 10 years, two- thirds of the total spending for long-term care come from government health care programs (Wiener, J. M., 2013). The long-term care services expenditure for the elderly is 1.3% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), projected expenditures by 2050 will range from 1.9% to 3.3% GDP (Wiener, J. M.,

Show More
Related
663 Words | 3 Pages

It depends on “multiple insurers and plans competing for customers.” When the coverage changes, people will struggle with “higher payments for increasingly restricted services”, which is even worse in many situations. Unlike McCardle’s solution is having both the universal and the free market plan for healthcare, Chaufan focused on just the free market one, which she continued to evaluating the pros of Medicare, or the single-payer system. First of all, it covers for everybody whether documented or not, on every needed services. Also, patients will have the choice in providers, which is more beneficial.

Read More
339 Words | 2 Pages

Nevertheless, there are also some arguments which discuss the cons of this healthcare system. The following is a brief review of what a Single-payer insurance plan is as well as its pros and cons. A Single-payer insurance plan is a system where a specific place’s government covers or pays for all the health care expenses of individual. Single-payer health care plan also known as “Medicare for all” is the type of health insurance where a single public agency organizes health

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

One of the longest standing debates in the U.S. has been a universal health care system for the nation. Supporters for such a system have argued that it would bring down costs and increase access to care, while opponents said it would be too expensive and would reduce the quality of care. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 is one key controversial attempt to bring a form of health care to America. Proponents from both sides of the argument have presented editorials of their opinions with varying degrees of objectivity with several types of evidence. Supporters of the system have often quoted a need for fair and equal coverage for all.

Read More
1513 Words | 7 Pages

Currently, the two main atrocities of Obamacare include the cost and the fact that making Americans purchase government issued healthcare was micromanaging. Based on the research surrounding the opposition to Obamacare, an improved plan could be funded in part by changes in the tax money. Making the top 5 percent of earners pay a more fair share and reducing the lower and middle-class population’s share would balance the costs and make it more affordable. Also with some of the tax money, a government non-profit insurance company could be established to offer more choices. Some research points to interest in letting people shop for their preferred insurance plan nationally as well instead of having to remain an in-state consumer.

Read More
1605 Words | 7 Pages

A Call for a Single Payer Universal Health Care System As the 2016 Presidential Elections draw near, the topic of much debate is that of healthcare. Some candidates vow for universal healthcare and mandate health insurance for all, while others believe that tax credits and health savings accounts will resolve the current crisis. Consequently, the nation has been divided on which plan to support and move forward with. Some fear universal health care will diminish the quality of care and lead to long waits, while others fear that health savings accounts and tax credits won’t be enough to insure all and will do little to diminish the administrative costs of the current system. Ultimately because healthcare is a basic right that should be guaranteed

Read More
1253 Words | 6 Pages

The recent debate about health care has been argued since the early 1990s with the introduction of the Clinton health care plan of 1993, which was pushed by the former First Lady, Hillary Clinton. In the most recent arguments about the state of the United States’ health care system, and repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act, the Graham-Cassidy health care bill is the newest in line to help reform the health care system to make it better for the government and for the citizens as well. Although, the bill has not come without its own internal and external criticisms as well. There are two opposing viewpoints either than the Graham-Cassidy bill is not doing enough for the free markets or that it is going to harm the current status quo.

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

The author refers to two “solutions” to universal health care; the public solution and the private solution. The public solution, also known as the single payer system, would be a program paid for by taxes. The private solution would be a mix of public solution supporters and supporters of more private businesses working together. Personally, the author believes the public solution would work best. Bodenheimer then goes on to explain the differences between the two solutions in further detail as a method of showing why he believes the public solution is

Read More
1446 Words | 6 Pages

A single payer system to some would considered a monopoly on the healthcare industry because of the government resources and power. However that is not the case. A single system would incentive more people to change to private insurance because the potential strain it might cause the individual. Mark E. Litow, publish the fears of a single payer system in “Benefit Quarterly”.

Read More
1318 Words | 6 Pages

Single Payer health care is also much cheaper overall than the currently implemented or any previously implemented system in the United States. The inefficiencies and deprivation of human due to for-profit health care systems must come to an end, and a single payer system must be signed into law because many people have had and will have their lives abused and ruined by the current

Read More
125 Words | 1 Pages

Universal healthcare is a threat to the American people, it restricts doctors, restricts government spending, and ruins free market principles; therefore, to restore the trust of the American people, congress needs to abolish government mandated healthcare. With the political season fully underway, universal healthcare and healthcare legislation is a hot topic. Many politicians will promise Americans social and financial programs that without digging deeper seems to be a great idea. Yet what this politicians don't disclose is that these policies are detrimental to American citizens. Government mandated healthcare is one of these policies.

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

The nature of the current debate surrounding the implementation of universal healthcare in America is troubling because it is comprised almost entirely of pragmatic arguments void of concern for the principles behind the project. Before one asks how much a thing will cost, how it will be organized, or whether “the uninsured” will benefit, one should ask whether enacting universal healthcare is in keeping with the values and principles of the American experiment. In other words, is universal healthcare good for America? Universal healthcare is not good for America.

Read More
1267 Words | 6 Pages

Too many people are living without health insurance coverage. This issue is causing unnecessary health problems because many individuals will not see the doctor for fear of an extreme expense. This universal system would also address the large number of people who go bankrupt because of the high premiums charged by individual companies and high costs of life saving medical procedures and drugs. We spend almost twice as much as other industrialized countries but still have over forty-million Americans who have no health insurance. Under the single payer system less money would be spent on billing and administrative costs.

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

The real debate is how can we accomplish the goal of universal healthcare in the most affordable and sustainable way. The United States is evaluated as a wealthy country, yet there are more penurious countries who provide health maintenance, paid through higher taxes. “In the United Kingdom and other European countries, payroll taxes average 37% - much higher than the 15.3% payroll taxes paid by the average US worker” (Gregory). With this data, the only reform would be to end the private health insurance companies of dominant health services, and incorporate a single payer system. Conversely, it is factual that taxes will rise, but the implementation of universal healthcare will better the health of American citizens.

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

Now that health insurance is mandatory a growing number of people insist that their government should subsidize this so there is no cost to the individual, because they see it as a right. You can not have a single payer system because of the financial and medical employment issues it would inevitably result in. Yet some who stand by the right to health care declare it will lower the overall cost of health insurance. With healthcare being a right they assume that all medical insurance will be reduced without affecting anything else.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of A Single-Payer System

Related Topics

Open Document