Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alaska oil drilling
Essays on drilling in alaskan
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alaska oil drilling
Essays on drilling in alaskan
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Alaska oil drilling
Controversy Surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline To build or not to build, this choice will impact the relationship between the US and Canada and determine the level of dependence the US will have on countries that are not so friendly. “TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day” (Parfomak, Pirog, Luther and Vann 4). The construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline would strengthen the United States economy, provide energy security and have minimal environmental impact. “The Keystone XL project would create $1.1 trillion in private capital investment at no
Wilder’s essay introduces every possible issue that can arise from Keystone XL pipeline, but my focus is towards climate change. She argues that the construction and refining the dirty oil will increases climates change effect. Why should Americans shoot an arrow that will be a harm to them? We risk reaching higher atmospheric temperature, serious droughts, and floods due to the changing climate. That is not the only way climate change will affect communities, but it will also have an impact on oil spills near communities.
For centuries the United States has been a beacon of hope for environmentalism, and it is imperative for our country that we preserve this identity. The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge or ANWR is in the secluded northeastern corner of Alaska and could contain large reserves of oil in the Prudhoe Bay region. The question of whether or not to drill for oil has been a controversial topic in American politics for decades, though the evidence will show that drilling for oil is a mistake for this country. This is because it will devastate and destroy the fragile environment. Additionally, drilling in Prudhoe Bay will not solve our oil problems.
Keystone Pipeline How would the Keystone Pipeline help the country through the U.S's economic strain? The Keystone pipeline could prove to play a major role in the survival of the United States. With tensions high in the Middle East and Russia; there is a need for another oil supply should the supply be depleted or withheld. The U.S imports nearly 80% of its oil from foreign countries. This means if these countries were to turn their backs on the U.S, the U.S would be left with 20% of our oil needs.
Although drilling in Alaska had its pro’s, it's con’s are more important. Some documents showed that it can be good but at the same time there would be a problem. Drilling would cause economic factors, environmental problems, and other problems. The best thing is to be safe than
Both sides brought up compelling arguments, on the advantages and dangers of drilling for oil in the artic. The side supporting drilling projects in the artic brought up that the artic has a significant amount of oil and oil is in large demand. They also explained that an alternative would be preferred but there is no alternative that can meet to demand of our advancing civilization. Furthermore they put out that drilling in the artic will influence Canada’s economy, it will relocate drilling operations from near civilizations, and the artic is not war torn, there are no diplomatic issues there. They concluded by saying oil will be used throughout our lifetime and the longer we wait the more urgent the situation will get increasing the chance
“Gasland” is a documentary on natural gas and how its drilling affects people. It really lets you see what these natural gas companies are doing. The toxic fumes and chemicals are ruining people 's lives to the point where some of them are dying. “Gasland” makes you grateful for what you have and how clean it is. Think about having to get your water every day and it was 30-50 miles away.
The environmental argument is coming from a clash over the fact they are basically stripping the canadian boreal forest, the path of the pipeline extends across major aquifers, and pipelines tend to leak and destroy surrounding environments. In addition ccording to The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions State, “epartment’s draft SEIS found that oil from the Canadian oil sands is 17 percent more carbon-intensive than the average oil consumed in the United States... It is estimated that the U.S. greenhouse gas footprint would increase by 3 million to 21 million metric tons per year, or around 0.04 percent to 0.3 percent of the 2010 levels, if Keystone is built. Fortunately on November 6, 2015, President Barack Obama’s administration rejected the Keystone Pipeline XL after 7 years of dispute. As mentioned in the Wall Street Journal, Obama stated “the project would not have lowered gas prices, improved energy security or made a meaningful long-term contribution to the economy
It’s important for the United States to produce and export oil because if we don’t, the Middle East and Russia will capitalize on the product and they will become stronger and richer countries. One of the ways that the United States can be an economically strong country is to reopen the Keystone pipeline and also allow states to have the power to generate their own oil. The opposition believes that pipelines have posed a huge risk to wildlife and the surrounding environment. The Key Stone pipeline has too many hurdles to go through; therefore, wildlife activists are against this project.
Should the United States Drill for Oil in Alaska's Wilderness? Environmentalists would say no because drilling would disturb the Inupiat’s (Eskimo) way of life. Others say drilling for oil would create jobs and lessen our dependency on foreign sources. The U.S. should not drill in Alaska because of economic reasons and environmental reasons. Some people believe that we should drill in Alaska because only 8% of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR was created in 1980 as a refuge for animals) would be used for drilling.
Deep sea mining is a relatively new mineral retrieval process that takes place on the ocean floor. in mining sites are usually an active and extinct hydrothermal vents at about 1,400 – 3,700 m below the ocean’s surface. The vents create sulfide deposits, which contain valuable metals such as silver, gold,copper, manganese. The deposits are mined using either hydraulic pumps or bucket systems that take ore to the surface to be processed. As with all mining operations, deep sea mining raises questions about potential environmental impact on surrounding areas.
Since he left office, there have been many proposals to open the Arctic Refuge coastal plain to oil drilling. They’ve all been denied because of the opposition by the American people, including the Gwich’in Athabascan Indians of Alaska and Canada, indigenous people whose culture has depended on the Porcupine caribou herd for thousands of years. The short-term economic gain is not worth destroying their homes. He said the Arctic Refuge may provide 1 to 2 percent of the oil our country consumes each day. We can easily conserve more than that amount by driving more fuel-efficient vehicles, we should just use our resources more wisely instead.
Fracking (hydraulic fracturing) in Maryland has been banned but was it ever given a chance? Fracking is a common form of drilling for oil and gas, but this form is not practiced in Maryland due to it being banned by state law. Fracking is conducted by shooting water, sand, and chemicals under extremely high pressure, down an oil well to crack apart the rock and release trapped oil and gas. The downfall to this method is that the water has to go somewhere, and it could it end up in drinking water causing the water to become polluted and potently “poisoned”. Governor Hogan signed Maryland’s fracking ban into law on April 4, 2017.
eople and society thrive off of a good economy when there is energy, business, or good markets, yet when the means of production (Bourgeoisie) interferes with the proletariats (working class) negatively, then problems arise. This is what is happening with hydraulic fracturing in America in relation to air pollution and the rate of which emissions are being released into the atmosphere. “The hydraulic fracturing water cycle describes the use of water in hydraulic fracturing, from water withdrawals to make hydraulic fracturing fluids, through the mixing and injection of hydraulic fracturing fluids in oil and gas production wells, to the collection and disposal or reuse of produced water” (EPA). In this operation, methane is being released in
Since its construction in 1977, the Trans Alaska Pipeline has transported almost 17 billion barrels of oil, and currently transports about 527,323 barrels a day. It celebrated its 40th Anniversary last year, and, even after all this time, is still facing controversy. The pipeline is highly debated as economically inclined citizens of Alaska are clashing with more environmental types. The Trans Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act, signed by President Nixon in 1973, protected the pipeline by banning all legal challenges against the construction of the pipeline. However, this law did not stop the critics of the pipeline from speaking out.