ipl-logo

Should The United States Drill In Alaska's Wilderness Essay

427 Words2 Pages

Should the United States Drill for Oil in Alaska's Wilderness? Environmentalists would say no because drilling would disturb the Inupiat’s (Eskimo) way of life. Others say drilling for oil would create jobs and lessen our dependency on foreign sources. The U.S. should not drill in Alaska because of economic reasons and environmental reasons. Some people believe that we should drill in Alaska because only 8% of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR was created in 1980 as a refuge for animals) would be used for drilling. Also, federal revenues would be enhanced by billions of dollars. Estimates for ANWR by the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Interior for the first five years after Congressional approval are 4.2 billion …show more content…

There are many economic reasons such as drilling in the ANWR would not solve gasoline and oil supply problems and not reduce the prices of gasoline and oil. The oil supplies in the ANWR would not significantly change our energy prospects, it only has a six month supply. Also, with the amount of oil consumed as a nation it is not possible to be self-sufficient (Doc C). Also, there are many environmental reasons such as the Coastal Plain where the highest concentration of the oil has been found is home to the Inupiat. Opponents say exploration would only be in 8% of ANWR and actual drilling in 2000 acres (Doc B). However, oil is in 30 pockets and drilling would be more spread out (Doc E). One effect is the eyesore like Prudhoe Bay with pipes and smokestacks and roads. Also, wild places are disappearing. For peace of mind and preservation of animals we have to keep some places on earth pure. People already have their share of the planet. All these economic and environmental reasons make a strong case of why we shouldn't drill for oil in Alaska. Jobs and tax revenue from drilling are only short-term. Drilling in Alaska should be thought of as going to Mars, you never know what is going to happen. If something were to go wrong we could possibly destroy one of America's most beautiful

Show More
Related

The Similarities Between Avatar And The Alberta Oil Sand

1577 Words | 7 Pages

The oil may be 500 m below the surface, further destroying the environment of wildlife (Tama Muru). In Avatar, companies hire military to extract the unobtanium that lies under the home of the Na’vi, and this procedure would require a similar process as oil sands. As result of these trees being teared down we lose biodiversity. This may not seem like a big issue, but because of animals losing their homes and the cascade effect there will

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Keystone Pipeline XL

2524 Words | 11 Pages

First, there is often a misunderstanding of what crude oil is used for, “Crude oil is not exclusively used to produce gasoline. Crude oil is used to produce thousands of products that we use every day, not just gasoline and diesel. Crude oil feedstock is used to create the plastics that encase our cell phones and televisions, asphalt for our roads and even the latex gloves doctors use when delivering a baby. ”(Myths & Facts-TC) One of the production company’s executives criticized the misinformed by saying, “The people suggesting that the oil Keystone XL will transport will be used to exclusively to make gasoline or diesel is simply a guess and they know that.”

Read More

Annotated Bibliography On Keystone Pipeline

903 Words | 4 Pages

Wilder’s essay introduces every possible issue that can arise from Keystone XL pipeline, but my focus is towards climate change. She argues that the construction and refining the dirty oil will increases climates change effect. Why should Americans shoot an arrow that will be a harm to them? We risk reaching higher atmospheric temperature, serious droughts, and floods due to the changing climate. That is not the only way climate change will affect communities, but it will also have an impact on oil spills near communities.

Read More

Keystone Pipeline Project Research Paper

2089 Words | 9 Pages

The environmental argument is coming from a clash over the fact they are basically stripping the canadian boreal forest, the path of the pipeline extends across major aquifers, and pipelines tend to leak and destroy surrounding environments. In addition ccording to The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions State, “epartment’s draft SEIS found that oil from the Canadian oil sands is 17 percent more carbon-intensive than the average oil consumed in the United States... It is estimated that the U.S. greenhouse gas footprint would increase by 3 million to 21 million metric tons per year, or around 0.04 percent to 0.3 percent of the 2010 levels, if Keystone is built. Fortunately on November 6, 2015, President Barack Obama’s administration rejected the Keystone Pipeline XL after 7 years of dispute. As mentioned in the Wall Street Journal, Obama stated “the project would not have lowered gas prices, improved energy security or made a meaningful long-term contribution to the economy

Read More

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Dbq Essay

808 Words | 4 Pages

Drilling for oil has caused many environmental issues over the years; now the United States wants to drill in ANWR, Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. People should not be able to drill in ANWR because of the long term problems of the native people, the Inupiats, and the environment. Drilling for oil disrupts the environment in many major ways and also changes the Inupiats’ lives. Also, some people think that drilling there will help the economy, but the oil there will only last for a short amount of time. These three main reasons, not to drill in Alaska, will be covered.

Read More

'The Arctic Refuge' By Jimmy Carter

655 Words | 3 Pages

He describes as how the area used for oil drilling will only be 1 to 2 percent of his country’s oil usage daily. He states that industry that is used there will produce so little that barely anything that the risk of the animals in the area is not worth to start industry there. The usage of this area is absolutely not worth and preserving the wildlife there is a better option. Jimmy Carter points a very good point why the industry residing in the area will barely change the oil usage shows how useless building industry on the Arctic Refuge will

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Drilling Into Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

1632 Words | 7 Pages

And drilling and exploring the area will also cause tons of pollution. The only real pro of drilling is that the United States will possibly get access to billions of barrels of oil and could cutback on the amount of oil it imports. Considering the pros and cons of the situation it seems pretty clear that the cons outweigh the pros so, it would be illogical to drill for oil. Background:

Read More

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Article Analysis

615 Words | 3 Pages

Some individuals believe that using the wilderness for drilling of oil purposes will solve the US and its dependency on foreign oil. Through this article, Democratic congressman Edward J. Markey, alongside Representative Nancy Johnson, discuss the reasons for which they want to save the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, or the ANWR, and other wilderness reserves from being developed on and industrialized. This wildlife reserve has been labeled as being one of the most magnificent reserves found in America. Unfortunately, people want to encroach on this territory and use it to increase the nation’s oil and gas development. This is not the first time that the reserve has been threatened but it is the most extreme.

Read More

How Does The Oil Sand Affect Canada

813 Words | 4 Pages

Oil is an extremely valuable resource, and oil mining and sales has an irreplaceable benefit in the Canadian

Read More

Jimmy Carter's Argument Analysis

466 Words | 2 Pages

Since he left office, there have been many proposals to open the Arctic Refuge coastal plain to oil drilling. They’ve all been denied because of the opposition by the American people, including the Gwich’in Athabascan Indians of Alaska and Canada, indigenous people whose culture has depended on the Porcupine caribou herd for thousands of years. The short-term economic gain is not worth destroying their homes. He said the Arctic Refuge may provide 1 to 2 percent of the oil our country consumes each day. We can easily conserve more than that amount by driving more fuel-efficient vehicles, we should just use our resources more wisely instead.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Us And Canada Are Very Rich With Many Natural Resources

284 Words | 2 Pages

This place is the largest reserve with sand mixed with the oil but this makes it harder and more expensive to retrieve. Since their population is very small most of their oil and natural gas goes to the US. The US and Canada also have a lot of coal. The coal is retrieved from the Appalachian Mountains, Wyoming and British Columbia.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Shell Oil Drilling

1676 Words | 7 Pages

Gas prices are rising sharply and crude oil is becoming scarcer. However, recent studies from the United States Geological Survey have shown that there is quite a massive deposit of unattained natural gas and oil located in the northern sector of Alaska. This huge natural oil reserve even extends into the Arctic Ocean. There are many challenges and problems to this dilemma of whether or not this oil and gas are worth obtaining. The argument for drilling includes big business companies, one of which is Royal Dutch Shell (Shell Gas).

Read More

Oil And Gas Drilling Persuasive Essay

524 Words | 3 Pages

However, we shouldn’t keep expanding oil and gas drilling because it’s not good for the environment, for future economy and it isn’t needed anymore. Expanding oil and gas drilling is dangerous for the environment because it contaminates water. According to EIA (U.S. energy information administration), the exploitation of natural oil leads to reject some dangerous substances that can kill aquatic life and all the undersea ecosystems. This would lead to even more polluted water, and then limit our access to potable

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Oil Drilling

1396 Words | 6 Pages

Has the world forgotten about the impact of drilling for oil has on the environment, it may cause more problems in the end than one may think. Putting the earth first is a priority that is looked over by many people, the earth is not a waste basket for mankind to just use and dump their unwanted things on. As Americans, if oil has the opportunity to be drilled in the United States, imagine the animals and plants, it's as if we are just sucking the earth life span when we continue to draw oil and other resources from her. Starting with the oil rigs out at sea. Pollution will begin there and will cause a rippling effect on the environment around it.

Read More

Drilling In The Arctic Essay

687 Words | 3 Pages

Greg Deemer, a ph from the National Snow and Ice Data Center said, “The act of drilling for oil … contributes to atmospheric greenhouse gas production the same way your automobile does. This is through the combustion of fossil fuels in vehicles / machinery that are used for resource extraction. The secondary effect of oil production in the Arctic region is that this oil will be consumed by customers across the world, emitting trace gases as a result of burning the resource for energy.” Scientists at Environment America found that burning the world’s remaining oil, gas and coal would melt the entire Antarctic ice sheet (Alt et al.). This could cause seas to rise high enough to, “put Miami, New Orleans, New York, Washington and other cities under water.”

Read More

More about Should The United States Drill In Alaska's Wilderness Essay

Related Topics

Open Document