ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

906 Words4 Pages

With the questionable accuracy of animal experimentation to answer the questions, we have about the human body system the next question that is asked is whether animal experimentation is necessary. The main reason animal experimentation is questioned on its necessity is because scientists all over the world have developed alternatives. A different type of alternative mentioned was cellular tests. Cellular tests are experiments that measure white blood cell response to chemicals and medical substances which can take the place of rabbit injections (Ask).
Then the last alternative form of animal testing is microdosing. Microdosing involves minuscule amounts of a test substance are given to human volunteers so researchers can track how said …show more content…

Specific cases mentioned include the medical breakthrough for diabetes. This breakthrough in the medical field is all thanks to the removal of the pancreases of dogs and the discovery of insulin. Another supporting claim the association made to support their opinion is the fact that the testing of the polio vaccine on animals resulted in reducing the global disease from 350,000 cases in 1988 to 27 cases in 2016. Without animal testing major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, and tuberculosis. The development of pacemakers, cardiac valves substitutes, and anesthetics have all been contributions of animal testing (ProCon). Another example includes Alan Lloyd Hodgkin and Andrew Huxley who won the Nobel in Physiology in 1963 for their on the nerves of squid that elucidated the basis of nervous transmission. John C. Eccles performed work on cats’ spinal cords that is recognized for first incontrovertibly demonstrating the nature of the synapse (Is Animal). Rabbits are commonly used for their eyes and skin to test the irritancy of chemicals in both areas to determine if it is safe for humans (What). It is hard to say whether these discoveries would have been made if animal testing was not

Show More
Related
800 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is not necessary because the results produced by animals are dissimilar to those of humans. According to the National Anti-Vivisection Society, “Different species… metabolize drugs and are affected by disease differently. No one model can accurately recapitulate the human condition because animals are not people.” Moreover,

Read More
643 Words | 3 Pages

Animal Testing has been a very controversial topic for decades. Throughout history, animal testing has played a major role in leading to many new medicines and discoveries. Most of the world participates in these experiments, with the aims of achieving the most modern technologies. Animal testing needs to be continued to advance our science and medicines, and to continue to save millions of lives.

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

Alternative testing methods now exist that can replace animal ,but still not completely. Source 1 Alternative to Animal Testing (Rachel Hajar, M.D) (against animal testing) - Animal testing led to progresses

Read More
625 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing costs a large amount of money, as the animals must be fed, housed and treated with various kinds of drugs. Based on the National Institutes of Health (NIH)’s 2014 budget in the United States, more than $12 billion was spent to support animal experiments. Five hundred thousand and 1.7 million dollar were used to experiment on dogs and monkeys, respectively. However, non-animal testing is generally more reliable, less costly and more humane than animal-based tests. Technology and innovation have taken medical research way pass the point where animal testing is the only alternative.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

If there are other methods other than experimenting on animals, then it is more logical to use them so that animals do not get harmed. By using different methods, animal experimentation could decrease or cease to exist, since there may be opportunities for growth in new, accurate methods. Some companies and institutions have started replacing animal experimentation with artificial human skin or other methods, and their results are still the same or better. The fact that new methods have “sparked quite a revolution in biology” means that countless amount of people can invent methods that surpass animal experimentation results. There should be acknowledgment that animal experimentation may be necessary sometimes, but most of the time, they can easily be replaced by other tests.

Read More
369 Words | 2 Pages

Animal testing goes as far back to greek philosophers such as Aristotle (384 – 322 BC) and Erasistratus (304 – 258 BC). Whom once performed testing on animals to advance behavior of something or who aspired to alter brain activity. However there was scientists such as Galen (129 – 199 / 217 AD), who used animals in order to attempt to improve various human activity within the body. Specifically focusing on cures and treatment for those who don't have them. Later, Ibn Zuhr began to use animal testing to benefit humans in which he would perform surgeries on them to ensure that the procedures would not harm humans.

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

Vaccines and treatments against once crippling diseases, including polio, mumps, and types of cancer-causing agents, have only been improved by experimenting on living organisms (The Surprising Pros). Research from the American Cancer Association shows that the fight against cancer has seen 24 advancements in treatments in the last 3 decades (Animal-Test Research). This form of testing can also improve the welfare of our beloved household pets (The Surprising Pros). Heartworm medicines are one example of how these experiments help domestic mammals (The Surprising Pros). Animal Activists fight for increasing the amount of human STEM cell research to replace this process with a respectable substitute (Stop Animal Testing).

Read More
554 Words | 3 Pages

Finally, lab animals has made an important contribution to every Nobel Prize in medicine. Many people also believe that animal testing is unnecessary and it has no meaning with the improvement for medical field. According to the similarities between human and animals we had seen, many drugs and medical methods are created and applied to people, which help decrease many diseases for human as well as animals. Over one hundred and nine years, more than a hundred of Nobel prizes were awarded to medical achievements which used animals as models for researches such as the Nobel Prize for the Development of diphtheria antiserum, which was researched on guinea pig in 1901, Nobel Prize for the Discoveries concerning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Read More
1866 Words | 8 Pages

Abstract Animal testing the experiments performed on animals that are used to test the effectiveness and safety of a wide range of things, from medication to cosmetics. They are also used to understand how the human body works. Animal testing is one of the major controversial issues, but animal testing has dramatically contributed to science. First, some people think that animal testing should not be used for testing medical techniques and drugs. However, medical research involving animal testing improved the health of human beings.

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

Many would argue that animal testing is important, and that it is better to do tests on animals than to people. While it may be true that people are more important, there are other alternatives. Some alternatives include growing human cells in labs, which can be done with just about any cell, human tissue donations, computer models, and volunteer microdosing, which is examining how a miniscule dose affects the body. These alternatives are much safer, much more reliable, and not to mention, much more

Read More
151 Words | 1 Pages

Everyday, non-human animals are being harmed and killed for medical training, biology lessons, and chemical, cosmetics, drug, food testing. It is estimated that 26 million animals are being used yearly for scientific and commercial testing, in the United States alone. The public debate between scientists and animal rights supporters has been happening since the seventeenth century about whether the use of animals in research through experimentation is right. Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, refers to the process of performing procedures on non-human animals for research purposes, ---Animals have been used innumerable times throughout the history of biomedical research. Utilizing animals to expand our knowledge on numerous

Read More
1822 Words | 8 Pages

Many debilitating diseases and conditions have been cured and prevented using vaccinations that were tested on animals. For example, Emil von Behring performed an experiment on guinea pigs that helped form the vaccine for diphtheria (Soft Schools). The significance of this experiment helped von Behring earn a Nobel Prize in Physiology (Soft Schools). Following von Behring’s findings, Edgar Adrian used frogs to confirm the specific way that the brain sends signals to different parts of the body (Soft Schools). Advancements in the understanding of diabetes, tuberculosis, and polio, along with the formation of anesthetics all were successful with the help of animal testing (Soft Schools).

Read More
858 Words | 4 Pages

Approximately 46% of the experiments tested on animals fall into this category. The use of fundamental testing is to answer scientific questions that researchers think may be pertinent to the future of human medicine. A study of the statistics gathered shows that out of 101 experiments done, only 5% of them were actually approved. Meaning these tests seldomly lead to medical discoveries. With all of this information, one can come to the conclusion that these tests, due to their lack of positive result, are not at all necessary (“Types of Animal Testing”).

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

The contribution of animal testing is significance. A report from California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals. For example Diabetics used to be the disaster to humans before the insulin was found. Frederick G. Banting solved this problem by doing

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

Animals Testing Is animal testing necessary?. Should we ban expending animals in medical research or not?. More than 26 million animals are used in different countries like the United States and Canada. Animal testing may by defining as the use of animals in experiments and research that seeks to control the variable that impacts the behavior or biological system under study. Using large number of animals is mainly meant to find treatments and cure for certain diseases.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

Related Topics

Open Document