Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discussion of the case for animal rights
The effect of animal testing
The effect of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discussion of the case for animal rights
The effect of animal testing
The effect of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Over 61,000 dogs suffer in U.S laboratories every year. More than 21,000 cats are forced to endure painful experiments in U.S laboratories anually. Animals have been used repeatedly for scientific research throughout history. However, not all animal studies have been successful when humans were involved. Animal testing torments many innocent creatures for unreliable and costly research that is not necessary.
The new standards stated that three requirements had to be satisfied: (1) “the voluntary consent of the person on whom the experiment is to be performed,” (2) “the danger of each experiment must be previously investigated by animal experimentation,” and (3) “the experiment must be performed under proper medical protection and management” (Washington, 2006, p. 221). These standards were violated when doctors injected Elmer Allen, a black man who had escaped the South and made a good life for himself and his family in Chicago, with plutonium-238 (Washington, 2006). Plutonium-238 is an even more intensely radioactive isotope than plutonium-239, which was given to most of the other patients (Washington, 2006). Allen suffered a similar experience
South Korea’s National Health and Welfare committee has just recently created a bill that will ban the uses of cosmetics and its ingredients, but it only works against areas that have an alternative to their cause (Miles). This is a great example of how laws that are supposed to fight animal testing just allow advocates of it to evade the laws’ restrictions. Further on the topic, in the nineteenth-century more companies led to the increased use of animals in testing, and subsequently, groups that set out to oppose the use of animals in scientific experiments (Murnaghan). That battle between those advocates and enemies of animal testing is still present and very alive today. Animal testing causes animals to suffer and does not benefit humans,
Should Animal Testing be banned? I. Imagine, being taken away from your family, and living inside a crowded cage in a laboratory without ever seeing daylight again. Every day, animals are being forcefully held and strapped down, while a scientist tests a new drug on their bodies. This is an example of a daily experience an innocent animal has to undergo for the rest of their life. Tested animals are held in captivity for the sake of finding new methods to cure diseases or simply for observation and examination.
Live animals aren 't necessary for testing, there are many options such as laptop software, robots, human tissue cultures, and mathematical statistics. Furthermore, the tests the animals are used for regularly come back with fake, misleading outcomes. Humans have been harmed because animals do not react the same way with certain drugs and treatments that people do. Animals additionally do not have the same genetic makeup that humans do, so testing drugs on them is useless. Finally, testing on animals has many moral problems that go with it.
Animal testing goes as far back to greek philosophers such as Aristotle (384 – 322 BC) and Erasistratus (304 – 258 BC). Whom once performed testing on animals to advance behavior of something or who aspired to alter brain activity. However there was scientists such as Galen (129 – 199 / 217 AD), who used animals in order to attempt to improve various human activity within the body. Specifically focusing on cures and treatment for those who don't have them. Later, Ibn Zuhr began to use animal testing to benefit humans in which he would perform surgeries on them to ensure that the procedures would not harm humans.
Bill #2 General Debate Pro- I am in strong support of this bill because animal testing is a dated and cruel method. The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings. The entire concept of animal testing is based on the fact that the discoveries found when an innocent animal is tested on can be applied to human beings. Thomas Hartung, Professor of evidence-based toxicology at Johns Hopkins University, argues for alternatives to animal testing because "we are not 70 kg rats.”
Animal testing has been used by scientists to test drugs and makeup products for many years. They have been kept in labs, poked, prodded at, observed, forced to inhale, eat, and wear substances that have killed them. Millions of animals have died each year because of this testing, and it needs to be stopped. Animal testing should not be continued because it is ineffective, it wastes lives, and is inhumane. Animal testing needs to be discontinued because it is ineffective.
“The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated,” a quote from Mahatma Gandhi. Animal testing has been around since ancient times with the Greek and Romans. Aristotle and Erasistratus were the first documented to perform experiments on animals between the years 384 and 258 BCE. Since the 1600’s, many people have debated on whether it is morally correct or wrong to test on animals. While testing on animals might help humans slightly, is it what we should do?
Animal-rights activists believe that animals should be treated equally as humans, and that animal testing is not good. However, animal-rights propaganda is often bombastic or inaccurate. These outlandish claims are untrue. The opposition also says that animal testing is not essential to discoveries.
Animal testing has abused thousands and thousands of animals. From shattering the hearts of millions of animal lovers, making beagles inhale poison, locking animals in small cages and horrifying the poor innocent things. Here’s the evidence to support that animal testing must stop soon. Heartless scientists put thousands of adorable animals through trauma and pain just for medicines, drugs and much more.
If a picture is worth a thousand words, then a quick Google image for images of “animal research” must be worth several hundred thousand. There is no denying the horrific and deeply disturbing nature of animal experimentation, no matter the purpose or supposed benefit to humans. Viewing these images generates a very visceral and negative reaction. It is this kind of visceral reaction that makes animal rights such a divisive issue. Images of sentient animals, like primates, rabbits, mice, and birds, has driven opponents to acts of terrorism in the defense of animal rights (Pilkington, 2015).
Not to mention, there are many alternative testing technologies that exist. For example, synthetic cellular tissue closely resembles skin and can be used for experimenting products, and humans can also be used to test the products. These alternative technologies eliminate the demand for animals. To conclude, animals have the same rights as us, just because these animals are not able to voice them does not mean those rights should be
Moreover, animals are used to develop medical treatments, check the safety of any products before people can use it and in science education. Therefore, without using animals in the medical and scientific studies the products and all the medicine would be based on theory only. Furthermore, people will use something that may cause serious damages to them. Animal testing has provided many
1- Experimenting on animals was documented in Greek physician- scientist like Aristotle and Erasistratus. 2- Rats and mice are the most used animals for experiments. 3- Any medicine or any cosmetics are first tested on animals.