According to U.S. News, “Between 2001 and 2013, the expanded trade deficit with China cost the U.S. 3.2 million jobs, and three quarters of those jobs were in manufacturing” (Peralta). Although it is smart as a business owner to export their jobs because it is cheaper, it’s still not ethically alright to do that to the people in third world countries. It’s less of an expense the business must pay causing the company to make a larger profit at the end of the day. But all in all, the businesses should try to keep jobs in the United States in order to help the American economy. But it is not ethical to pay these workers such a low wage that they can barely survive and provide for their families.
A supply chain with such big complexity brings a lot of challenges for the technology giants like corporate social responsibility crisis with numerous accusations of exploitations in its subcontracted factories. With that, Apple has been accused of using China's weak government regulation (Foxconn) for labor exploitation within their factories. Even though these issues with Apple and Foxconn are separate,
Everything from clothing, automobiles, and toothpaste come from countries without sufficient labor laws. In the United States, one of the most prominent countries that they purchase products from is China. Unlike the porcelain and silks sold 500 years ago, now China exports electronics, toys, synthetic fabrics, household supplies, and everything imaginable. While the United States benefits immensely from their products, China is not in the most favorable of conditions. Due to all of the factories in China, their environment is worsening.
This shows in the past in China, Apple employers mistreated their employees by using children to work for them in their factories such as cleaners and many other crucial roles. However, this has been solved in the past years when Apple has acted and changed the warehouse and factories system where all employees had freedom and were paid on time. Although Apple stopped the child exploitation as this could have ruined their reputation in the market forever. I am going to describe two different political factors and how they affect Apple in UK and in China. The political factors which I would be explaining are Tax policy and Internet.
Low income and poor people in other nations in which Apple operates don't get any taxes from the profits made by Apple. Its Americans and international shareholders who benefit from dividends paid by Apple. When Apple starts paying its fair, legal and moral share all will benefit except for a one off to the share price. Countries are fighting to get companies and jobs. Free trade agreements prevent anyone from charging tariffs.
Even for the wealthy that could afford this luxury, many products are not made domestically. For example, the ever-popular technology company, Apple, manufactures in China, allowing Americans to obtain high returns on their investment. The cost of labor large companies like Apple would have to invest to American workers makes this idea illogical from a business
One step an employer can take in ensuring that they are complying with the Immigration Reform and Control Act is to verify the identity of new hires using legal documents. Typically, employers ask new hires to provide them with a copy of their driver licenses. Employers also ask for social security numbers on applications. With this basic information in hand, employers can use agencies which specialize in background checks to verify the employees’ eligibility to work in the US. According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Employers should not ask whether or not a job applicant is a United States citizen before making an offer of employment.”
Like other businesses, Apple could be affected positively or otherwise by both political and legal factors such as government policies and regulations, public health issues, political instability, war or terrorism, political unrest in countries where Apple has its operations, labor issues can also halt the business. In recent time, Apple was hit by tax avoidance accusations. According to forbes.com “Because Apple is so profitable, the dollars involved will certainly attract attention (this is a Senate committee after all, so that is the point). The report alleges Apple reduced its U.S. corporate income tax by an average of $10 billion-a-year for the past four years. Since the corporate levy generated only about $240 billion in 2012, $10 billion
I think Apple should be strict about following the labor rules and policy. I believe this because there company brand is on the line. By allowing Hon Have to have sweatshop labor conditions in China, people will hear about that and not want to buy Apple Product. I think that they company should enforce the US labor standards since the company is distributing in the US. I think they should imply these standards so they stand for what apple is about which is a responsible corporation that is environmental concerned and labor friendly.
Apple Inc have produced great products, however Apple Inc have also perfudicae the environment and other people with its production. There are some reasons why Apple Inc should not deserve people to buy their products, due to the fact Apple had being part of the damage the factories that do production for Apple. Apple do not have their own factories to produce parts for their products, they have others factories to produced for them, but those factories had damaged its community. Those factories have its workers producing parts for Apple working on harsh conditions and if they work overtime, it is not pay well. Also workers on those factories for Apple parts do not have safety rules or resources, some of the workers had accidents while using
Have the CEOs of these overseas American corporations seen the harsh conditions of their factories? It may be true that corporations are cutting cost by having their international factory operating at the bare minimum, thus, creating a great profit margin for the company, but at what price? The ideas these corporations are operating under are unethical, inhumane, and unfair towards of their workers. Since the mid 1970s until recently, Nike was conducting business overseas in an unethical manner.
If we where to this, it would bring jobs, more money for America, and China won 't have control over are companies. When I was little, my grandma use to work in sewing factories and they would make clothes there instead of China making everything. She ended up losing her job, when the company moved overseas. Our president talks about bringing more jobs in America, but he is allowing these companies to travel over sea for less money in order to make these items. However, if you stop and think about it the money we spend in order to ship the items over seas and them ship it back.
Not only was it abusive, but also illegal. This resulted in 13 workers attempting to commit suicide. For Foxconn to kill its competitors, product parts were sold at “zero-profit” to one of its main customers, Apple. This was a tactic for Foxconn to get hold of Apple’s other lucrative contracts and gain a larger market share in the industry (Pun, 2010). Foxconn was responding to expectations of shareholders at the expense of other constituencies, in this aspect, the migrant workers.
In this way, the sale of products in world-wide market will increase. • Increased labor costs in China could take away the cost advantage of some Apple products. • Decaying middle-class incomes in some developed countries, including the United States, could shrink the potential market for higher-end consumer goods such as those marketed by Apple. • A strong U.S. dollar could increase exchange rates, making it more expensive for Apple to do business in key markets like Europe and
Answer of Apple Inc. Apple Inc. is an American Multinational Technology Company headquartered in Cupertino, California, that plans, creates and offers customer hardware, PC programming and online administrations. Mac was established by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak and Ronald Wayne on April 1, 1976, to create and offer PCs. It was consolidated as Apple PCs Inc. on January 3, 1977, to mirror its moved center forward shopper gadgets. Apple's authoritative structure and work environment practices not just permit representatives for expanding imaginative and imaginative thoughts to develop, but at the same time are without a doubt positive for representative prosperity. Presently, it is a multiproduct second biggest innovation organization by income
