Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the effects of pollution in china
Effects of pollution in china
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the effects of pollution in china
Effects of pollution in china
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
According to U.S. News, “Between 2001 and 2013, the expanded trade deficit with China cost the U.S. 3.2 million jobs, and three quarters of those jobs were in manufacturing” (Peralta). Although it is smart as a business owner to export their jobs because it is cheaper, it’s still not ethically alright to do that to the people in third world countries. It’s less of an expense the business must pay causing the company to make a larger profit at the end of the day. But all in all, the businesses should try to keep jobs in the United States in order to help the American economy. But it is not ethical to pay these workers such a low wage that they can barely survive and provide for their families.
A supply chain with such big complexity brings a lot of challenges for the technology giants like corporate social responsibility crisis with numerous accusations of exploitations in its subcontracted factories. With that, Apple has been accused of using China's weak government regulation (Foxconn) for labor exploitation within their factories. Even though these issues with Apple and Foxconn are separate,
Everything from clothing, automobiles, and toothpaste come from countries without sufficient labor laws. In the United States, one of the most prominent countries that they purchase products from is China. Unlike the porcelain and silks sold 500 years ago, now China exports electronics, toys, synthetic fabrics, household supplies, and everything imaginable. While the United States benefits immensely from their products, China is not in the most favorable of conditions. Due to all of the factories in China, their environment is worsening.
This shows in the past in China, Apple employers mistreated their employees by using children to work for them in their factories such as cleaners and many other crucial roles. However, this has been solved in the past years when Apple has acted and changed the warehouse and factories system where all employees had freedom and were paid on time. Although Apple stopped the child exploitation as this could have ruined their reputation in the market forever. I am going to describe two different political factors and how they affect Apple in UK and in China. The political factors which I would be explaining are Tax policy and Internet.
Low income and poor people in other nations in which Apple operates don't get any taxes from the profits made by Apple. Its Americans and international shareholders who benefit from dividends paid by Apple. When Apple starts paying its fair, legal and moral share all will benefit except for a one off to the share price. Countries are fighting to get companies and jobs. Free trade agreements prevent anyone from charging tariffs.
Even for the wealthy that could afford this luxury, many products are not made domestically. For example, the ever-popular technology company, Apple, manufactures in China, allowing Americans to obtain high returns on their investment. The cost of labor large companies like Apple would have to invest to American workers makes this idea illogical from a business
One step an employer can take in ensuring that they are complying with the Immigration Reform and Control Act is to verify the identity of new hires using legal documents. Typically, employers ask new hires to provide them with a copy of their driver licenses. Employers also ask for social security numbers on applications. With this basic information in hand, employers can use agencies which specialize in background checks to verify the employees’ eligibility to work in the US. According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Employers should not ask whether or not a job applicant is a United States citizen before making an offer of employment.”
I think Apple should be strict about following the labor rules and policy. I believe this because there company brand is on the line. By allowing Hon Have to have sweatshop labor conditions in China, people will hear about that and not want to buy Apple Product. I think that they company should enforce the US labor standards since the company is distributing in the US. I think they should imply these standards so they stand for what apple is about which is a responsible corporation that is environmental concerned and labor friendly.
Disneys unethical behaviour with regards to its sweatshops, affects all three environments the micro, market and the macro environment even though sweatshops are absolutely unethical it impacts Disney in both negative and positive ways, the micro because in the micro environment they employees are incredibly unhappy which will decrease production levels, it will affect the market environment because they are getting their products produced at such a low price they will be making more of a profit than other companies and will have more of a monopoly of the customers because they can still decrease their toy prices and still make a massive profit. It could also negatively impact Disney because when other companies worldwide find out about Disneys multiple sweatshops they may pull out of working with them to avoid getting associated with what they do, therefore Disney will lose relationships with suppliers and other companies. It would have a negative impact on the macro environment because people would stop coming to Disney land and supporting and buying the toys and products they produce which will have a heavy impact on Disney as a whole, it will cause them to lose customers and a huge
Have the CEOs of these overseas American corporations seen the harsh conditions of their factories? It may be true that corporations are cutting cost by having their international factory operating at the bare minimum, thus, creating a great profit margin for the company, but at what price? The ideas these corporations are operating under are unethical, inhumane, and unfair towards of their workers. Since the mid 1970s until recently, Nike was conducting business overseas in an unethical manner.
As unethical as they are, it is not uncommon for large corporations (particularly in United States) to offshore their production to sweatshops. Let’s take Apple for example. The most profitable company in the United States and one of world’s most successful companies is part to blame for employing sweatshop labor. Employees in factories (especially in China) where iPads and IPhones are assembled, work in harsh environments and have to bear some brutal experiences. An article by The New York Times states “Employees work excessive overtime, in some cases seven days a week, and live in crowded dorms.
If we where to this, it would bring jobs, more money for America, and China won 't have control over are companies. When I was little, my grandma use to work in sewing factories and they would make clothes there instead of China making everything. She ended up losing her job, when the company moved overseas. Our president talks about bringing more jobs in America, but he is allowing these companies to travel over sea for less money in order to make these items. However, if you stop and think about it the money we spend in order to ship the items over seas and them ship it back.
I believe that one of the most cost-efficient, best managed, and most admired company in America today is Apple. I researched the company and I found out that Apple has been able to maintain their status as one of Fortune 500's most profitable company for three years in a row. This is quite impressive because although their profits sank 14% in 2015, Apple was able to maintain their revenue and come up with new ways to get more dividends to became the highest dividend-paying stock in the world (Wieczner). In 2017, Apple was ranked #2 on Drucker Institute's Management Top 250 list (Dhiraj). This means that Apple is considered one of the most effectively managed companies in America.
Not only was it abusive, but also illegal. This resulted in 13 workers attempting to commit suicide. For Foxconn to kill its competitors, product parts were sold at “zero-profit” to one of its main customers, Apple. This was a tactic for Foxconn to get hold of Apple’s other lucrative contracts and gain a larger market share in the industry (Pun, 2010). Foxconn was responding to expectations of shareholders at the expense of other constituencies, in this aspect, the migrant workers.
In this way, the sale of products in world-wide market will increase. • Increased labor costs in China could take away the cost advantage of some Apple products. • Decaying middle-class incomes in some developed countries, including the United States, could shrink the potential market for higher-end consumer goods such as those marketed by Apple. • A strong U.S. dollar could increase exchange rates, making it more expensive for Apple to do business in key markets like Europe and