There are extinct animals like the dodo and dinosaurs and several other species that do not live on this Earth, but what if they could be brought back? Even if they could be brought back should they? The answer is yes and scientists that are trying to bring extinct animals back like dinosaurs should keep trying to because these extinct animals could improve our world. People that say that dinosaurs should be brought back are wrong.
One Opinion from the book moonbird is, " To become extinct is the greatest tragedy in all nature. " Page 107,chapter 8, "extinction is forever". I agree with this opinion completely because it's true, extinction is forever, no more animals of that species would exist on earth if it were extinct. This is tragic because every living thing is precious and is what gives the earth beauty, life, joy, and even gratitude.
Woolly mammoths (Mammuthus primigenius) have been extinct for a very long time, with the last of the species dying out about 3,600 years ago. But researchers say it may be possible to bring these and other extinct species back from the grave. There is significant controversy and critics over the idea of bring back to life and assert that efforts would be better spent conserving existing or endangered species. Critics of resurrection say reviving extinct animal could do more harm to conservation efforts than good. As for me, I would be disagreeing with the idea proposed.
In recent discussions of the absence of black fathers, a controversial issue has been whether it can be prevented. On the one hand, some argue that it cannot. From this perspective, I contradict. In the words of Michelle Alexander, one of this view 's main proponents, "Hundreds of thousands of black men are unable to be good fathers to their children, not because of a lack of commitment or desire but because they are warehoused in prisons, locked in cages (Alexander, 2013, p. 739).
I adore the ancient creatures of the Ice Age. However. The return of the wooly mammoth could conflict with habitats and niches. If the wooly mammoth were to be resurrected it could cause harm to other species, such as exterminating the species or limiting the resources available. In addition, it would have to take on a new niche, which could lead to three outcomes.
Primary candidates include keystone species such as wooly mammoths. It is similar to Frankenstein in the way that they are bringing back the dead, but with different technology. In Frankenstein, the creature is made with body parts, mystical chemicals, and a shock of lightning. In De-Extinction, they are bringing the animals back using cells from remains, creating an egg that is placed within a capable host with hopes that the operation is a
It relates to Jurassic Park by the trying to create a dinosaur that did not even exist at all. By doing that it had a very bad fail to it. Scientists can keep that in mind when making modifications in this DNA
Scientist believe that the research of the de extinction could help with large animal conservation(Shultz,2017). Researchers in bringing back mammoth has lead to scientist working on curing herpes virus which is threatening to asian elephants because there endangered(Shultz,2017). Reproducibly technese to revive the wooly mammoth can be used to increase scientist knowledge of elephant reproduction to help conserve elephant species. Reasoning for my argument is with all the human viruses, it will help with curing large animal
For starter, scientists are considering bringing back multiple different species and are working very hard on ways to do that. They have come up with multiple ways to do, one of them is extracting DNA from that animal, like a fossil or frozen mammoth. They then use that DNA and insert it into a surrogate mom, of a close species, and have a surrogate father, of the same close species as the mother, involved in the process. They they have a new old species back roaming the earth again. They can help to
Imagine what would happen if we lived in a world where water was kept 8 feet off the ground and there was absolutely no way you could get it if you weren’t tall enough. Most likely, the short people would die off. The taller ones would multiply, and before long, instead of a population of people of all sizes, you would have a population of only tall people. Living things that are best suited, or adapted, to their environment survive and multiply. Those that are not, are unable to survive.
In the article 5 Reasons to Bring Back Extinct Animals and 5 Reasons Not to, the author Breanna Draxler explains, “De-extinct species would be alien and potienally invasive; their habits and food sources have changed. So their in these changed ecosystems could be too” (2013). This means that if extinct species comes back, it would have new food sources and habits to adapt to. In the article De-Extinction Probably Not Worth It by Sarah Zielinski it states, “Then they would have to successfully re-introduce the species to the planet, taking care to find a place where the new-again species wouldn’t harm other animals and where the animal would be safe from whatever drove them extinct in the first place” (2017). This explains that if a species were to come back to the world scientists would have to re-introduce them to their habitats, their food sources, and other animals around them.
Eugenics is the science of using artificial selection to improve genetic features of the population. It is thought that improvement of the human race can be seen through sterilization of people who exhibit undesirable traits and selective breeding. Often called Social Darwinism, the concept was widely accepted during the time of World War I. It quickly became a taboo after World War II when Nazi Germany used it as an excuse for genocide. The thought of improving the human race by manipulating who is allowed to breed can either be appalling or compelling.
It would make us soon realize how bad it would be to see animals that are needed, disappear but that will never happen! To continue, “ It will reproduce endangered or even extinct species.” The author is trying to say that, the more species that become extinct, or placed on the endangered list, would really have an effect on the whole world. There will most likely be at least one endangered animal for each continent, most likely by the end of this year, or next year. So, once we are able to clone the animals, certain
Is Genetic engineering Safe? Genetic engineering is the modification of an organism’s genetic composition by artificial means, often involving the transfer of specific traits, or genes, from one organism into a plant or animal of an entirely different species. Human beings ought to consider the pros and cons of genetic engineering before using it. It is a contentious topic because people have different views of weather genetic engineering is safe or not.
Animals in Their New Natural Habitat Why are different species becoming extinct? Do researchers know how many innocent animals are killed each year? When will animals be protected in a comfortable habitat? In man-made environments, such as zoos and other nature parks, animals that are born in the wild are protected and well taken care of. Due to animals running around in the wild, scientists and researchers can track the amount of animals being killed everyday.
