ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Banning Nuclear Bombs

478 Words2 Pages

Did you know it’s impossible to know how many nuclear bombs there are in the world? Nuclear bombs are highly harmful and can give off radiation. It can kill millions, possibly with enough nuclear bombs it can kill billions! If we can stop nuclear bombs, we can save many lives altogether. Nuclear bombs, can destroy world peace altogether I’m for banning the nuclear bombs, because of the amount of harm nuclear bombs can do. From the nuclear testing, Bikinians had to evacuate their homes. The Bikini atoll was demolished on July 1958 from nuclear testing. After almost 30 year later, they told the Bikinians the island is now habitable (Resource 1). Nuclear testing can demolish beautiful land, including lives of plants and animals. Although the Bikinians are able to go back to their home, they don’t trust what the Americans say about it (Resource 1). Since the Bikinians back then didn’t know what nuclear bombs were, they thought they were getting a temporary home when they were moved. …show more content…

“Hostile countries are more likely to have a war in which they may use nuclear bombs against each other, and the result could prove disastrous for the entire planet.” (Resource 2). Since nuclear bombs are in our hands, these bombs can do harm to many things. From nuclear bombs, plants and animals with habitats that can be demolished in hours. Not only can it kill plants and animals, it can also kill massive amounts of humans. Global destruction is one major problem these nuclear bombs are capable of doing. If we could ban the usage of nuclear bombs from the world, we would have no nuclear

Show More
Related
150 Words | 1 Pages

The thesis of Ashley Herzog’s College Classes for Conservatives to Avoid is that many university of a myriad of worthless classes for their students to take and that they should be avoided if possible. Her thesis is covered in both the first and second paragraphs. Along with the primary purpose of in informing people, particularly conservative college students, about pointless class Herzog has a secondary purpose entertainment. She uses satire to poke fun at the classes that she considers to be worthless. Herzog assumes her audience holds the same conservative view as the only time she actually makes a direct reference to her beliefs is in the title.

Read More
1094 Words | 5 Pages

This is a powerful argument, as it appeals to the emotions of the reader by suggesting a devastating and irreversible outcome if nuclear weapons are not abolished. They warn, “Shall we put an end to the human race, or shall mankind renounce war?” This statement is a stark reminder of the potential consequences of our actions and the need to work together to prevent such a catastrophic event. The authors argue that the use of nuclear weapons would result in the destruction of civilization as we know it. They claim that the only way to prevent a nuclear war is to eliminate nuclear weapons altogether.

Read More
1248 Words | 5 Pages

If a nuclear bomb was dropped today, it would most certainly lead to a nuclear war killing many people. But, in 1945, two atomic bombs were dropped on Japan by the United States just to end World War Two. Or one thinks so. Another theory about the atomic bomb droppings claims that the United States dropped the bombs to intimidate the Soviet Union in the post-Second-World-War era. Ultimately, this claim can be seen as credible because the war in Japan was on the brink of ending, the U.S wanted to make the Russians manageable by showing are capability, and America did not want to make allies with the Soviets.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

In addition to the bomb affecting their homes and cities, it affected their physical self as well. Document 9 states, “The three main types of physical effects associated with a nuclear explosion are : blast and shock, thermal radiation, and nuclear radiation; each have the potentiality for causing death and injury to exposed persons … among them, apart from genetic effects, are the formation of cataracts, life shortening, and leukemia.” Many life threatening situations can happen to a person if in contact with a nuclear bomb. Which shows how deadly a nuclear bomb is and how it should not be

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the years of 1945 and 1991, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were involved in what is today is identified as the Cold War. During this dark time many lived in fear due to the newest weapon that would be used in war, nuclear weapons. These weapons caused fear throughout the whole world because of their capability to kill thousands with just one. Today many debate over the abolition of nuclear weapons in the United States. Some argue that the U.S. should abolish nuclear weapons, while others say nuclear weapons should not be abolished in the United States.

Read More
441 Words | 2 Pages

Weapons of mass destruction are banned for similar reasons. For years, it has been generally agreed on about when a war is just and how to be fought. The use of atomic bombs violated these principles. The direct targets were civilians and non-military installations and the environmental damage was not

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Dropping the bombs could one day lead to ending the world because of nuclear

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

Nuclear bombs is a sort of technology that would hurt the human race if released into the world more than once. As well as our technology use to “help” us, but instead gets rid of our focus in life and makes us lazy to do anything to the world or try to succeed in helping the world. Technology humans created would soon be our desintegration. Once again as Omar Bradley once told the world, we shouldn’t be arrogant or incoherent to continue with technology without the proper safety regulations that needs to be sent across the universe. Without the proper security humanity will soon perish with the use of our own

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

In an evening they could ruin a significant part of the earth and end human civilisation. The weapons at present held by nine countries are what might as well be called 150,000 times the bomb that demolished Hiroshima. Indeed, even a modest part of the world's atomic stockpile blasted on urban areas in a local atomic war on the opposite side of the world -, for example, in the middle of India and Pakistan, or in the Center East - would adjust the atmosphere for a considerable length of time, crushing horticulture and bringing about starvation on a scale never

Read More
1042 Words | 5 Pages

The world has avoided nuclear war until now, but what if that were to change? How many nuclear bombs would it take to eradicate humanity? The last time Nuclear weapons were used in war was in 1945, on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima & Nagasaki, at the end of WWII these bombs, dubbed Fat Man and Little Boy would be considered primitive by today's standards, and were actually two different types of bombs Little Boy, the explosive that destroyed Hiroshima was a uranium gun-type bomb which was detonated by firing one piece of sub-critical material into another triggering the nuclear reaction Fat Man was a plutonium implosion-type bomb which was triggered by essentially using smaller explosives to squeeze the bomb's plutonium core In terms of explosive power, Little Boy is estimated to have been between 12

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

Nuclear bombs and missiles are extremely dangerous to both the target and the user. If a nuclear weapon were to go off while on a ship or in storage, the explosion of that weapon will trigger any nuclear weapons around it. This would cause a chain reaction that, depending on the weapons power and location, could destroy things from a warehouse to a small town (Kimball, "Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What”). Also, the United States, our neighbor, has enough nuclear weapons to blow itself up roughly four times ("United States Has Enough”). That is over fifteen million square mile of land.

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

The use of nuclear power can cut down on pollution. “The strong likelihood that the plutonium would be required in the relatively near future would render continuous reprocessing of irradiated fuel, using the existing capacity, the most economical way of providing this resource for future generations. At the same time, it would simplify the management of high level waste, as the half-lives of nearly all the other isotopes present in the waste would be much less than that of plutonium. Storage of the accumulated plutonium in a single, high security facility should, in UK conditions, avoid the possibility of any of the material being acquired by terrorists; the non-plutonium bearing high level waste would be an unattractive target for terrorists.” Not only does this solve for the issue of clean energy, it also can solve for the issue of dirty bombs.

Read More
3678 Words | 15 Pages

Nuclear energy may be the solution that eliminates our concern for energy production in the future, but it still remains a huge issue for the environment. Despite its wide use in many developed countries, nuclear energy poses many threats to both the

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

Should All Nuclear Weapons Be Destroyed? "The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender. In being the first to use it, we adopted an ethical standard common to barbarians of the Dark Ages. Wars cannot be won by destroying women and children.”

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

If nuclear weapons were ever used again it could wipe out all of humanity. The United States created the first nuclear weapon in 1945, and with those nuclear weapons they bombed two Japanese cities called Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nuclear Weapons should be banned, Countries should not have weapons that could wipe out the civilization. Nuclear weapons pose a direct threat to everyone. They cause distrust among nations and they are useless in addressing any of today 's real security threats.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Banning Nuclear Bombs

Related Topics

Open Document