Utilizing the new ideas and implementing them in the field, therefore, remains an option that is worth consideration by medical experts Though the research undertaking yields crucial information for future development in treating AD, some advantages and disadvantages come with the study process.
The investigations and conclusions launched and developed by the researchers also bear some issues worth discussing in this critique (Barnett et al., 2015). Right from the population chosen to represent AD people and healthy subjects, the researchers show scope limitations . A population of 72 patients divided into two groups would stand as a minimum representative portion to give just a general face of the research idea. The population would, however, fail to provide a precise representation of the major idea in the study undertaking. The fact is true, especially considering that the current population of AD people.
…show more content…
The same sample size adjustment would also apply to the healthy population which forms the rest of the population. The limitation in size, therefore, contributes to a reduced precision in all the CANTAB tests carried out in the study process. The advantage that the research undertaking exhibits is the careful selection of a control group. The control group of 30 healthy individuals helps to give an effective contrast to the test findings as a comparative component of the norm (Kuzmickienė & Kaubrys, 2016). The conclusions of the research find indisputable support in the results of the study. The study conclusions are, therefore, an evident product of the findings and research data obtained in the field work which is a great merit of the research