ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Federalism

618 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Merits of federalism

What is the government and how is it supposed to work? Is the government for the safety of the country and the people? When putting one mind to govern all, the person is not speaking for all. That is why representation is important, that is why having more than one person in absolute power is going to be the best way to run things. This is why federalism is the best choice of system when it comes to governing something. However this is not a “which is a better system of government competition”. Especially since both sides have very interesting ways of doing things, and pros and some bad cons that come with their way of doing things. There will be a couple paragraphs going over the history and the phases of federalism. Along with explaining …show more content…

Of course, america has a history of revolting against those who decided to cage them, but now america is considered to be free of those chains it once had. The founders realized that they still needed some limitations and that nothing could be completely free or else there would be chaos. They had three reasons for creating the federal system. The first reason was to avoid tyranny or using the government for cruel and wicked reasons should not be allowed. Next, to allow more people to have a voice in the political system. Allowing more people to have their voices heard will make more people feel as if they are being equally heard, and it would squash the the feeling that political choices being made were in favor of a single person's beliefs. Finally the rule to avoid using the states as guinea pigs to test out things like new laws or legalizing something that was previously not allowed. Another name for this process is also called “Laboratories of Democracy”. There is too much at risk that comes with it. Though these are not the laws that are heavily forced, they are allowed to be altered. For example during the Obama’s presidency and years before, there has been tons of debates about marijuana and how it will affect the public. So Obama, worked around the system and got permission to legalize marijuana, but only in the state of

Show More
Related
703 Words | 3 Pages

“The different governments will each control each other at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Doc A, Madison,James, Federalist Paper 51, 1788). Each part of the government had there own jobs to do, for example the central government has the power to regulate trade, conduct foreign relations, provide an army and navy, while the state government set up local governments, holds elections,

Read More
156 Words | 1 Pages

Anti-Federalists in the late 1780s strongly objected to the amount of authority given to the government by the constitution, and had an unorganized but large effort to prevent its ratification. The Anti-Federalists believed that liberty could only be upheld if the federal government remained small and uninvolved with local matters in the states. Congress, with the power to make laws deemed necessary and proper, has no firm limitations under the constitution. Anti-Federalists thought that each state should control itself, with minimal interference by Congress or the national government. The purpose of becoming independent of England was because the King was not sympathetic to struggles in the Americas, and under this new constitution, the executive

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

The Concurrent Powers are so significant to everybody and it's crucial that State and Federal Government would be involved

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

In 1787, the founding fathers created a constitution to prevent such a thing from happening again. The framers of the constitution avoided tyranny by using Federalism, separating federal powers/Checks and Balances, and a

Read More
397 Words | 2 Pages

The American government is proposed by the constitution, principles that we as Americans live by. To live by this constitution was a well thought out idea. Without it, we run a greater risk of

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

America has been shaped in many different ways, but one of the most important is the way the country is governed. Once the Revolutionary War was over, the United States of America needed to figure out a new way to govern their country because when the states had more power than the national government, the country was weak. The Framers of the United States Constitution ultimately decided to give more power to the Federal Government rather than the state government because the Articles of Confederation were weak, the Constitution was strong, and the Constitution was more likely to succeed than the Articles. The Articles of Confederation were used to govern America during the Revolutionary War.

Read More
433 Words | 2 Pages

The Anti-federalist,didn't hate the federalist they just didn't agree with them in some points. They just were in favor of the states having more power than they did. Anti-federalist focused on the bill of rights and equality. They were worried that the constitution didn't equally divide power among the three branches of government. They were also concerned about giving the federal government power to regulate commerce.

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

Interactions amid the provinces and the federal government, from constitutional issues to the most irresistible topics bang up-to-date in the country, are indemnified beneath the umbrella of “Federalism”. Authorities are shared so that on some matters, the state governments are decision-holders, whereas on the other matters, national government grasps the autonomy. In last twenty-five years, the upsurge of federal fiats on both governments, local and state, has shifted the power amongst state and national governments. Now, the national government is beginning to have more governance over the state’s engagements.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

Under the guidance of Alexander Hamilton and John Adams, Federalists became a popular political party at the end of George Washington’s term. As a proud Federalists in the United States under Washington, a numerous amount of hypocrisy has consumed the population on, “What were Federalists’ views?” A Federalist strongly believed in the power of the national/central government because it would have yielded stability to the country. Instead of a democracy or popular sovereignty, an “aristocratic leader,” would have best led the nation (History in the Making- Chapter 10).

Read More
499 Words | 2 Pages

So, the real question is, why should government have more power than the states and the people they govern? Shouldn’t the people have the power? Corruption, government overreach, large wars, and staggering amounts of debt are just a few issues with a large, powerful

Read More
425 Words | 2 Pages

I would choose to be an Anti-Federalist because they did not loathe federalism, they just had felt the need to make some improvements. They had strived to put more power into the hands of the states. As the Anti-Federalists believes, I strongly agree with the constitution but I truly believe the bill of rights which was added later was very crucial to the U.S Constitution. The bill of rights has a big part in the citizen’s personal rights that people have all the time. I honestly can’t fathom what our country would be like if we did not have these rights being put into place.

Read More
1203 Words | 5 Pages

“The Federalist,” written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison under the surname ‘Publius,’ attempts to convince the American people that a republican government would be beneficial to both the people and the United States as a whole. Since ‘Publius’ is, in actuality, three different people, one would expect to find some discrepancies between authors. However, in analyzing “The Federalist,” Madison and Hamilton present a unified front – in order to control the effects of factions, they agree that a government should be able to protect its constituents from their misguided passions, that virtual representation is necessary, and that checks and balances among the divided powers of the government are vital. Factions are a source

Read More
1823 Words | 8 Pages

The Government is the ultimate ruler of the people, sets the ultimate laws of the land and says what goes and when not pleased uses all the means in their power to influence. The basic functions of the United States government are listed in the Constitution. Due to the immense power of our federal government, people often argue that it is too powerful and should be lessened. Sub further the state governments use a sum of power to do the same. There has been an effort to shift power from the federal government to the states.

Read More
1621 Words | 7 Pages

A specific federal law, which demonstrates the assignment of duties from a federal law to individual states and reliance in “cooperative federalism” is the Clean Water Act of 1987. Underlined under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq), the purpose of the clean water act is to “restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters …” The essence of this act, “to restore and to maintain” focuses on the elimination of pollutants and waste harmful to the natural environment and the health of the public. Integrity stresses on a national level of moral righteousness, nationalism, and what must be done to uphold the foundations of a country’s nature wildlife. In particular, the division

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

However, this ruling does not overturn a state law such as California to allow medical marijuana in their state. However, it does mean that people who have an illness such as Larry Harvey are at risk of being sued by the federal agencies including Drug Enforcement Administration. The Bush administration has been against legalizing medical marijuana, Justice Paul Stevens of the Bush administration has been emphasizing against marijuana stating “unscrupulous physicians” might exploit the broadly worded California law to make marijuana and sell it. On the other hand, California Attorney General Bill Lockyer emphasized that ill citizens of California will continue to grow medical marijuana ignoring the risk of arrest and prosecution under federal law. Attorney General Bill Lockyer said “shows the vast philosophical difference between the federal government and Californians on the rights of patients to have access to the medicine they need to survive and lead healthier lives.”

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Federalism

Related Topics

Open Document