ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Fracking

612 Words3 Pages

Fracking is worse for the environment than conventional oil drilling because conventional drilling does not present as many environmental threats as fracking does. It is estimated that energy companies consumed nearly 250 billion gallons of water between 2005 and 2014 for hydraulic fracturing. This is more water per unit of energy produced than conventional oil and gas exploration requires for drilling and cementing wells (How Much Water Do U.S. Fracking Operations Really Use?). Also, fracking companies are not required to disclose the chemicals used in fracking fluids, also known as slickwater. Since the fracking process is so complicated, any mistake could trigger mass contamination of these chemicals into surrounding environments such as …show more content…

Conventional oil drilling does not deal with nearly as many dangerous chemicals in its process. Fracking can also be used to draw more oil from depleted conventional oil wells. This process exhausts the Earth. Furthermore, immense amounts of water is used when fracking and is a huge waste of natural resources. “Based on approximately 1,500 horizontal wells fracked in 2011, Pennsylvania used about 12-20 million gallons of water per day for Marcellus Shale drilling, which represents approximately .5-.8% of the 9.5 billion gallons of water the state uses daily” (Explore Shale. Marcellus Shale Development, Geology and Water). This waste of water is even more concerning when the droughts in America are considered. In California and Texas, both are located in areas with major fracking shales. In fact, most places dealing with drought currently sit on top of active large shale formations that are part of active fracking

More about The Pros And Cons Of Fracking

Open Document