ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of GMO Research

811 Words4 Pages

The web page that I used for this essay was from the ZME Science online magazine (https://www.zmescience.com). On the website, I reviewed an article titled, “Why people hate GMOs (when they shouldn’t)”, which was written by Tibi Puiu and published on May 5 2017. Mostly, the article centered on how scientists and their research on genetically modified organisms (GMO) /crops are safe to eat and have the capability to change worldwide hunger, but the public opposition to (GMOs) remains strong. This discrepancy between public opinion and the scientific evidence requires addition information. ZME Science was established in the summer of 2007. They a trusted source of science news and features covering research and developments from all scientific fields. Their purpose has been to bring their readers the best …show more content…

He states that “The discrepancy between public opinion and the scientific evidence requires an explanation. We argue that intuitive expectations about the world render the human mind vulnerable to particular misrepresentations of GMOs” ( owall%3Dtrue). He talks about another researcher, Nassim Nicholas Taleb talks about how criticism are often levied against those who argue for caution portraying them as unreasonable and possibly even paranoid (com/pp2.pdf). Meaning a lot of times people do not take the time to understand technology and don’t understand change nor care for it. The change doesn’t even have to big a big one, even the small ones can make people very unreasonable. The article showed a study by Nassim Nicholas Taleb that people can think differently no matter what the research say and research that the crops are ok to eat by Geert De Jaeger. So both forms of evidence are considered credible for the

Show More
Related
517 Words | 3 Pages

Although things such as the amount of GMO’s (genetically modified organism) in the food is worse today than it was in the turn of the twentieth century, the

Read More
638 Words | 3 Pages

An Analysis of Bill Nye’s Episode on Genetically Modified Foods In the episode of his show “The Eyes of Nye” entitled Genetically Modified Foods, William “Bill” Nye presents scientific evidence surrounding the debate on genetically modified foods. He emphasizes that we should farm responsibly, which he believes should involve making decisions on the modification of each food on a case-wise basis. In summary, his view is that we need greater transparency in the farm-to-table process. In order to understand his conclusion, it is necessary to critically evaluate the arguments and examine the validity of each argument.

Read More
1576 Words | 7 Pages

Both essays share common themes, in mainly advocating for sustainability in the food and agriculture industry. However, the authors suggest different methods to obtain this. Can GMOs Be Sustainable, written by McKay Jenkins mainly discusses the usage of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) in the agriculture industry, and the controversy that surrounds them. The article is mainly through the point of view of farmer Jenny Schmidt, who discusses the positive effects of GMOs, and how they can help farmers. However, there are also perspectives given by different professionals, which all support the conversation of sustainability in the food industry.

Read More
268 Words | 2 Pages

Lang believe the three biggest issues around gmos are labeling, intellectual property, and consolidation in the food industry. Society is suspicious because we don't know who is producing the food. Intellectual property is a issue because majority of the information in a is copyrighted. Lang discuss how labeling is a huge issue because labels impact the profit and labeling can be misleading. Grocery stores assume people read certain labels and want to buy the products.

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

In the essay “Green monster” who do you believe is his intended audience and why? In “The Green Monster,” James McWilliams informs the reader about GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms) and the affects it has on animals, plants, farmers and our food. Through multiple illustrations of the affects of GMO, he contends that GMO has various potential consequences, which may in fact be more positive than detrimental to food sustainability. His intended audience seems to be food consumers but more specifically, those uninterested in or wary of products which are genetically modified.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

The Non-GMO talk passionately about the effects GMOs have on human bodies and the environment. They do have valid statements such as, “In the absence of credible independent long-term feeding studies, the safety of GMOs is unknown” (Non-GMO Project). This is completely true. There have been no long-term studies on what GMOs can do to humans which can be a caution people can take when deciding of they want to consume products that have been genetically modified. However, the other of this argument, the people against GMOs, have created such a panic within the rest of the country that many decide to get GMO free products just in case there are negative effects.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

“Today in the United States, by the simple acts of feeding ourselves, we are unwittingly participating in the largest experiment ever conducted on human beings.” Jeremy Seifert certainly knows how to get viewers’ attention, as exemplified by the film blurb describing his 2013 documentary, GMO OMG. The frightening depiction of the food industry is one of many efforts to expose consumers of the twenty-first century to the powerful organizations that profit from national ignorance and lack of critical inquiry and involvement. Seifert effectively harnesses the elements of rhetoric throughout his phenomenal argument against remaining complacent about the food industry’s act of withholding of information about genetically modified organisms from

Read More
588 Words | 3 Pages

She effectively makes an argument to inform and persuade her audience of the threats associated with genetically modified foods. She strides to influence her readers to accept a claim as reasonable based on reliable evidence. For instance, Mathers reinforces her statement concerning the reason GMO’s are not labelled is due to the biotech industry convincing the Food and Drug Administration they are not significantly altered however, the FDA does not perform their own independent testing (Mathers 43). The FDA instead relies on the observations of the manufacturers which causes the audience to question its trustworthiness. This approach aids Mathers by damaging the FDA’s credibility.

Read More
1826 Words | 8 Pages

(Kracht para 2). This explains the fear of GMOs because people generally avoid things with unknown risks, especially when it involves science. Furthermore, labeling products creates fear, since consumers view it as a danger. A recent example of how labels cause a scare is the “gluten-free craze.” When gluten free labels increased, so did the fear of gluten, as well as gluten free diets.

Read More
1096 Words | 5 Pages

GMOs are considered to be the next agricultural “innovation” as some would say, but this is incorrect. They think that GMOs are a way to feed everyone on earth. Giving them the nutrients that they need to grow in conditions that most plants can’t live in, while not causing harm to physical and environmental health. They are wrong. GMOs do more harm than good.

Read More
443 Words | 2 Pages

What was the youth rebellion in the 1960’s? The youth rebellion was a time where the young wanted to be free. Young adults started to rebel and disobeying their parents. They wanted a different lifestyle. This shorty made it through the states and the so-called hippies started to make their way up and cause trouble, it was known to be “youthquake” during this time.

Read More
522 Words | 3 Pages

After taking a week-long break from concentrating on my paper, reflecting on it revealed different aspects of my argument. First, one strength of my paper is my perspective. Although I am biased in assuming that the core requirements are beneficial, I support this claim with evidence. I do this through my credibility statement, "During the beginning of my freshman year, the abundance of core annoyed me; however, learning the intentions behind the stipulations led me to acceptance and understanding." Also, I try to relay to the audience Calvin 's reasoning behind the requirements.

Read More
1471 Words | 6 Pages

Tests have proven the genetic modifications as destructive towards the human body. “The percentage of Americans with three or more chronic illnesses jumped from 7% to 13% in just 9 years; food allergies skyrocketed.” This was all after 1996 introduced GMOs. The article also states, “... in the nine years following the introduction of GMOs in 1996 food allergies, disorders such as autism, and chronic illnesses increased sharply.” This change in genetics is creating many problems in the United States.

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

It’s a popular topic on the media that GMOs are bad for the human body. Well, little did the they know that ninety percent of corn grown in the US is genetically modified (Margie Kelly), and the body can 't even distinguish between GMOs and non-GMOs! There are people debating that GMOs are unhealthy, bad for the economy and even the environment. These people must be uneducated on this topic. Genetically modified crops improve our society because they allow farmers to yield a larger crop, improve the quality their crop, and lessen the negative environmental impacts of their crops.

Read More
864 Words | 4 Pages

Disagreement in some aspects can hinder the value or the extent to which the knowledge is applied in the real world, therefore reducing the “robustness” of it, when using my definition of robust. An example for this counterclaim is the frequent hostility towards genetically modified organisms (GMOs) predominant throughout Europe. Despite the positives these crops offer to consumers and farmers, the European Union heavily regulates their consumption, production and importation in hope of protecting its population and the surrounding environment (“Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003”) . Judging by the fact that 71% of French people who completed a survey about GM food completely rejected the idea, the culture throughout Europe heavily disagrees with GM food (Bonny). Only 5 countries within Europe produce some sort of GM crop, predominantly maize, reducing the application of the knowledge which GM crops bring to farmers, producers and sometimes even consumers.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of GMO Research

Related Topics

Open Document