ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering

955 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Should genetic modification be allowed

Without further contemplation, it is easily assumed that science and religion are polar opposites; vastly separated regions in the realm of human consciousness. Two powerful schools of thought both devoted to the idealistic task of uncovering a higher truth, they are most often thought to contradict each other. However, scientific discovery is dictated by and can only flourish in allegiance to a governing religion or ideology. The agenda, application, and future of science are decreed by religious or ideological doctrine, and the advancements of modern society could not exist without it.
The agenda of science has become wholly enmeshed with and is dictated by the governing religion or ideology. Science is an expensive endeavor: approximately $32 million was spent on scientific research and development in Canada in 2014. Due to its costly nature, the research that gets funded is that which will benefit a particular ideology, …show more content…

Ethical questions regarding the extent to which controversial applications of science, such as genetic engineering, should be used can be answered by the governing political doctrine. In the hands of a corrupt, fascist government, the genetic technology available today could be easily used for dire eugenic purposes. To contrast, one of the focuses of genetic engineering in Canada today is on genetically modified food. This use of technology benefits the current political-economic ideologies, and is leading our future in a very different direction than if these technologies were used for eugenics. The overarching ideological doctrine of a nation solves ethical questions about the use of scientific discoveries, as well as to what extent known applications should be employed. Ideology makes it possible to answer ethical questions about the use of science on a large scale; questions that cannot be answered by science

Show More
Related
267 Words | 2 Pages

Which, as I have already said, under the present situtation of affairs, is utterly impossible by all the methods hiherto proposed. " This quote shows the author has thought long and hard about the solution to the problem, and the proposal the author is about to make will set out with logic. There is an element critiquing science discourse, turning humans into

Read More
1785 Words | 8 Pages

Using simple logic in this stamen makes people understand where she is coming from and relate to her opinion. The statement not only targets the government but also the effect bills and funding have on scientist and people who want to advance society. The U.S. came close to tripling spending on biomedical research, and when federal funding decreased, private funding increased to make up for what the government did not give out. (Fry-Revere 4) The author reinforces her claim by stating that it is far better to be privately funded do to less restriction of ethical conduct.

Read More
1110 Words | 5 Pages

“Our advances in science over the past two centuries have truly been extraordinary, but our society still suffers from the forces that reject reason and prevent our ability to take full advantage of discoveries

Read More
2250 Words | 9 Pages

It is important that we accept that religion is Man’s attempt to answer these questions and because it is an institution reliant upon faith, it is acceptable for one to accept Religion as a precursor for complex ideas, and interpret its fallacies as misunderstandings, however, it is unreasonable for one to justify the rejection of science to prevent controversy with the beliefs of religion. Furthermore, it is unreasonable for one to ever justify the rejection of science for any reason, as this praxis clouds the mind and decreases one’s capacity to comprehend the true nature of the universe and the governing laws to which it

Read More
2665 Words | 11 Pages

Those who criticize Harris believe that forcing people to choose whether they believe in faith or science will only further divide the scientific and religious communities. Harris acknowledges this argument, writing “that if we oblige people to choose between reason and faith, they will choose faith and cease to support scientific research.” (Harris). This is potentially dangerous to the future of science. Polarization could drive funding and support away from the scientific community and limit further advancement.

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

On March 22nd, at the San Francisco March for Science event, Adam Savage gave a presentation about the enemy of science is bias. The main point in Adam Savage’s speech would be that science is the key to saving our world. Yet, science has a big enemy and that is bias. His speech was easy to follow, but at the same time it was not, because of how fast he was moving. Although, he was just implementing his main point throughout the entire speech.

Read More
2236 Words | 9 Pages

One such moral choice is the question of whether the pursuit of scientific knowledge ought to be constrained by concern for

Read More
1038 Words | 5 Pages

The World Controller says that “science is dangerous; we have to keep it most carefully chained and muzzled” (Huxley 225). Science prompts discovery and creativity, but the World State only wants to use control for pacification and

Read More
452 Words | 2 Pages

Without a Christian worldview, it is impossible to conduct any form of science. Only with Christianity, can we understand that the world is orderly because an orderly God creates it. God is rational; with no rationality there is no science. Science is asking how the universe works and finding out how.

Read More
1186 Words | 5 Pages

Science and religion both offer explanations for the creation of the world but that does not mean it has to be one or the other. These explanations can be used together to help individuals attain a greater understanding. Empirical evidence offers a practical view and an approach used in a physical context. Faith and religion offer a way of moral understanding and a purpose for one's life. When these ideas work together, a worldview where science and faith are able to coexist is

Read More
1980 Words | 8 Pages

Dr. Marty Klein Recap: Legitimate scientific research is often discounted by politicos proclaiming that the issue is “controversial” even when there is a clear-cut consensus among recognized scientists. Consider the so-called debates about the harmful effects of tobacco or climate change, or how IUDs and emergency contraceptives work. Combined, those high-profile issues (and others--fluoride in city water, etc.) are often identified as issues of phony controversy--as they were in a National Geographic magazine cover story, “The War on Science” (March, 2015). For a good example of that ploy we also have Jeb Bush’s (a potential 2016 presidential candidate) comments about climate change. Bush said that “he wasn’t a scientist” but nevertheless he believes the “science” of human-caused climate change was “convoluted,” and questioned the degree to which carbon emissions are responsible.

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

Science policy has been defined by the Royal Society of Biology as “the combination of scientific expertise with knowledge and understanding of government and policy making, decision making and scrutiny processes to ensure that legislation and policy have a sound evidence base” (Royal Society of Biology, 2017). This definition identifies the broad spectrum of topics that are encapsulated under the title of science policy and shows there is almost no limit to the scope that science policy incorporates to some degree. Science policy is undertaken by research councils; policy makers direct a research council to focus on a specific topic and the research council portrays the science in a way that is clear and unbiased for all policy makers. This

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

in Scientific Research. Ed. Sylvia Engdahl. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2015. Opposing Viewpoints.

Read More
1118 Words | 5 Pages

Furthermore, the cold fusion incident, along with many other incidents involving pseudoscience and non-science has harmed the reputation of scientists and the scientific community as a whole. With a countless amount of pseudoscience’s and non-sciences “posing as science,” the credibility of what science actually is and the scientific community is at risk (Hansson). When scientists spend their whole day in a lab conducting experiments trying to figure out a cure for cancer or how to better protect the environment, they should not be discredited or take the blame for neither the misconduct of others and/or the spreading of false information that has not been approved by the scientific community. According to the article “What Is Psuedoscience?” by Michael Shermer where he quotes Michael D. Gordin, a historian of science from Princeton University, he reiterates that “No one in the history of the world has ever self-identified as a pseudoscientist” (Gordin).

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

Is Genetic engineering Safe? Genetic engineering is the modification of an organism’s genetic composition by artificial means, often involving the transfer of specific traits, or genes, from one organism into a plant or animal of an entirely different species. Human beings ought to consider the pros and cons of genetic engineering before using it. It is a contentious topic because people have different views of weather genetic engineering is safe or not.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering

Related Topics

Open Document