ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering Of Animals

1004 Words5 Pages

The genetic engineering of animals has increased quite quickly in the last couple of years , and the use of this technology has brought up many hot discussions , this discussion is related to the overall health of animals and whether or not it is safe for the animal . These issues need to be seen and discussed by stakeholders , of these people veterinarians must be on top , So that they may ensure the overall knowledge of what this practice truly does to the well being of animals and how unnecessary it is . As a result of the extra challenges that genetically engineered animals bring, governing bodies have started to develop relevant policies, often calling for increased vigilance and monitoring of potential animal welfare impacts. Veterinarians …show more content…

Animals have sadly been “enhanced” to what is considered better by humans so that they may be of better use. For example, “genetically engineered pigs and sheep that have been genetically changed to have higher levels of growth hormones. Genetically engineered farm animals can be created to have better food quality. For example, pigs have been genetically engineered to express the fatty acid desaturase gene from spinach for higher levels of omega-3 and goats have been genetically engineered to express human lysozyme in their milk. Such advances may add to the nutritional value of animal-based products.” as can be seen in the article by Elisabeth H. Ormandy. Farm species are genetically engineered unnaturally in order to make them less pollutants Genetic engineering has also been applied with the aim of reducing agricultural …show more content…

This means that large populations of animals are produced to obtain genetically engineered animals that are of value but hardly any actually have the change that make them of any value to the human population so it makes all the animal suffering worthless. In addition, the advancement of genetic engineering technologies in recent years has to lead to a huge increase in the number of genetically engineered animals, particularly mice. Although the technology is continually being made better it just isn’t enough to stop animal suffering, current genetic engineering techniques are still inefficient, with many kind animals being exposed to harmful procedures. In Canada, the CCAC’s annual data on the numbers of animals used in science show an increase in Category D procedures this means the procedure has the possibility to cause moderate to severe pain and distress at present the creation of a new genetically engineered animal line is a Category D procedure. The data also show an increase in the use of mice which are the most commonly used species for genetic engineering which is sad considering as mice have no law protecting how hay are treated in labs because of how cheap and easy they are to breed and produce more of, making them over 90% of the genetically engineered animals used in lab testing . It has been said by professionals that once there has been

Show More
Related
1277 Words | 6 Pages

Studies show that with all of the animal experimentation that has been done, most of them were inhumane, unreliable and had violated the Animal Welfare Act of 1966. This act ensures that animal care for research is a main priority. It is also required to have appropriate veterinary care, housing, feeding, handling, sanitation, ventilation, and sheltering. For some, animal experimentation is “supposed” to help human beings use certain products for their own benefit. What people do not realize is that these animals have rights and that their rights are being more than violated.

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

Genetically altering horses by these methods developed by science brings into question whether or not this is ethically correct. The use of science to alter nature's perfection that has taken millions of years to perfect

Read More
2110 Words | 9 Pages

The first category I will analyze is the consequentialist argument, which argues that the negative consequences related to bio-enhancement largely outweigh the benefits when it comes to animal technologies. Within this argument I will address three main concerns: the harm animals may experience as a result of biotechnologies, health risks of the engineered animal, and the suffering animals may go through if used for testing purposes. A large amount of studies on animal genetic enhancement report high rates of miscarriage, stillbirth, early death, and genetic mutations and diseases among the modified subjects. In Bernard Rollin’s The Frankenstein Syndrome: Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals, Rollin lays out an argument he calls “the principle of the conservation of welfare”.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

The increasing developments and availability of the animal byproducts lead to a change in society’s perspective of the world and a perception which is now controlled by the big corporations. Industries began to change their product line to benefit from the genetic advancements. This was evident in many industries, including the food industry replacing chicken with ChickieNobs and the medical industry using pig-grown human organs. Initially both the ‘natural’ and GMO variants of products were available, however with the control of

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

Selective breeding in animals and agriculture are both benign and accepted practices, but still fall under the umbrella of biotechnology. Therefore, it is important before making an ethical analysis to differentiate between benign and intrusive biotechnology. That divide is where genetic engineering comes in. Genetic engineering, the “scary” type of biotechnology, is the practice of altering an organism’s DNA to give it the preferred genes. This practice has led to much good, such as making crops bug resistant, dispelling the need for harmful pesticides, or curing immune diseases, but there is also potential for harm.

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

The great argument of genetic modification is that the outcomes are unpredictable and the side effects are worse. First, genetic modification of animals is unethical. The FDA has yet to approve the consumption of genetically modified animals. It is simply stated that genetically modified animals should not be apart of the food chains. Genetically modified animals are carried out for human proteins and therapies.

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

Moral relativism is an umbrella term that carries both subjectivism and conventionalism. Subjectivism is the ability to kill a man and it be accepted because of individual moral beliefs that it is okay to do so, as to conventionalism, you would be incarcerated for most or all of your life due to the fact that society sees murder as wrong. Conventionalism takes the individuals spread beliefs onto a society level through media, networking, or culture. It creates a safety net for knowing right from wrong.

Read More
698 Words | 3 Pages

Design-A-Baby The ethical and moral aspects of genetic engineering are one of the biggest ongoing debates in the biomedical engineering field today deals with. Genetic engineering is a powerful and potentially very hazardous tool. Although the potential benefits can be huge, modifying the arrangement of nucleotides of the DNA that code for the construction of a complex living organism can lead to exceedingly harsh effects although the potential benefits can be huge. What began with crops and different types of plants may now be more than what anyone could have imagined.

Read More
1036 Words | 5 Pages

Furthermore, genetically modifying organisms has given us the option to improve characteristics of crops such as enhancing disease resistance, nitrogen efficiency, salt, drought, and pest tolerance. There are many cases

Read More
1871 Words | 8 Pages

Genetically Modified Organisms have been the topic of major debates and controversy over the past three decades. Genetically modified organisms ( GMOs) are defined by The World Heath Organisation (WHO) as organisms whose DNA has been altered in a non-natural way (selective breading does not create a GMO). Genetically engineering organisms allows selected individual genes with desired traits to be transferred from one organism into another organism, even between two completely unrelated species. This same process can eliminate undesirable traits of an organism. GM foods are largely produced because it is seen that there is some advantage either to the producer (the farmer or company) or consumer (the average person) of these foods.

Read More
1867 Words | 8 Pages

Genetic modification for animals involves altering its genetics by changing, adding and removing certain DNA sequence in a way that does not occur naturally. Its aim is to enhance specific characteristic that will work in certain ways to help and benefit humanity. An effect of this production of several protein and drugs that are useful for human society. The ethical issue surrounding the animal welfare has been increased other serval years and requires serious considerations.

Read More
1875 Words | 8 Pages

The Encyclopedia Britannica defines Genetically Modified Organisms as an “organism whose genome has been engineered in the laboratory in order to favour the expression of desired physiological traits or the production of desired biological products.” (Fridovich-Keil & Diaz, 2018, para. 1). Genetically Modified Organisms or GMO’s, can refer to the genetic modification in animals or agricultural purposes. The long held practice of modifying the genotypic traits can be traced back to prehistoric times, in which farmers would select the most fruitful crops. For instance, teosinte was domesticated over 10,000 years by humans from a small grass to form modern maize (Genetic Science Learning Center, 2013).

Read More
1671 Words | 7 Pages

Presently, in the 21st century, many individuals say the world is nearly a scientific transformation that brings a standout amongst the most ¬controversial thoughts ever: genetic engineering of humans. I accept this is morally wrong, perilous, and will prompt issues in our general public. Human Genetic Engineering is the modification of genetic material. As science is enhancing as so does our need to bring about a significant improvement place innovative progressions have given us a chance to clone many animals yet the following step you say?

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

Also when modifying animals scientist take extreme caution to make sure that there animals are safe. This is important because modifying animals have been done in the past and the scientists that work on the animals have had no problem. Also the engineers that work on the animals are highly trained. “Ethical issues, including concerns for animal welfare, can arise at all stages in the generation and life span of an individual genetically engineered animal” (Gilly Griffin).This shows that when we overcome the problem of cloning animals modifying animals can be very useful. Some examples are that we can increase lifespan which would be very big.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

Since techniques have become more precise and readily available, it opens the possibility of creating new species and completely altering a species. But with that come environmental and health concerns? By creating a new organism and releasing it into the wild, could another species be entirely eradicated? Does human consumption of genetically modified organisms affect humans in any way? All these questions are valid and should be highly researched with each new genetically modified organism, however, the benefit of genetic engineering out weight the

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering Of Animals

Related Topics

Open Document