ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

1389 Words6 Pages

The Dark Side of Gerrymandering
Gerrymandering has been around ever since the forefathers of America first started the nations democratic voting system. Gerrymandering is the redistribution of electoral district lines in order to give the redistributors an unfair political advantage (Elliot). While it is technically a legal practice, it allows the political parties in office to find a way to gain political advantages by separating minorities and voters of opposing political parties. The social inequalities and federal dishonesty associated with gerrymandering must be addressed and regulated as it poses a real problem for Americans as their votes are having less and less of an impact on elections.
There are two common types of gerrymandering …show more content…

Republicans won again in a tight race against the Democrats, taking away 56% of the overall votes in the polls. However, Democrats ended up with only 5 out of the 18 seats in the House of Representatives (Gerrymandering Rigged). By winning 44% of the overall votes, the Democrats were only able to represent 27% in the House of Representatives due to the congressional districts drawn up by Republicans. This shows how large of an effect gerrymandering can have when used to its fullest extent. There is an uneven proportion of representation in the House of Representatives due to the congressional districts drawn up by whichever political party is in office. Republicans were able to successfully gerrymander and win elections not only in Ohio and Pennsylvania, but also in Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Texas, Louisiana, Arizona, and Tennessee. Democrats were also able to gerrymander and win in Maryland and Illinois (Gerrymandering Rigged). This shows how gerrymandering can affect the country as a whole, as most states are being heavily influenced by the representatives in office. Gerrymandering can affect not only state representatives, but the can also play a part in national elections. In the 2016 presidential election, this was evident as Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by almost three million votes, while Donald Trump ended up winning the electoral vote. By winning …show more content…

Some people could argue that gerrymandering is a favorable practice as it can increase the odds of their preferred political party to stay in office. However, gerrymandering acts as counter to the democracy of America by displaying a biased representation in government that contradicts the votes of the American people. There should never be a question as to whether or not boundaries are being drawn to “crack” or “pack” minorities into certain congressional districts, and congressional lines should be redrawn in states like Ohio and Pennsylvania so that they may be able to more accurately give representation as to how their citizens voted. By eliminating the social inequalities and federal immorality of gerrymandering, citizens in America will be able to hold equal voting power when it comes to electing

Show More
Related

Gerrymandering Benefit Political Parties

289 Words | 2 Pages

Gerrymandering is the process of redrawing boundaries to benefit the political party in power. An example is Nevada, in which the four districts show the three forms. Gerrymandering was made after Elbridge Gerry, who was the governor of Massachusetts and Vice President of the U.S., signed a bill that redistricted the state to benefit his party, which was later called Partisan Gerrymandering. An individual observed the oddly shaped district as a "gerrymander" causing a newspaper reporter to print a cartoon of a monster based on it.

Read More

Summary Of Oklahoma Law Tough On Minority Party

1196 Words | 5 Pages

The article, “Oklahoma Law: Tough on Minority Party and Independent Presidential Candidates”, by Richard Winger seeks to explain how Oklahoma stringent election laws came to be and why having these laws that make it difficult for minor parties to succeed should change. The problem Winger addresses in his article is supported by historical evidence ranging back from 1890 to today, with comparisons made to other states. The case against rigid election laws that Winger presents is supported by over a century of historical evidence he presents. Starting in 1890, when Oklahoma was still a territory, voters were free to create their own ballots. These ballots were typically provided by a voter’s preferred political party and would only carry the

Read More

Gil Vs Whitford Case Summary

490 Words | 2 Pages

This is shown in an article written by Quartz that states that “Wisconsin’s partisan gerrymandering deprived citizens of their constitutional right to a vote with value” in other words would diminish a person's

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Voting Districts

369 Words | 2 Pages

In advising the Chief Justice, it is obvious that the voting districts should be redrawn for a multitude of reasons. As the system of drawing districts stands, it is highly vulnerable to corruption for the party in power, as they are the ones deciding the districts. Concurrently, those in power are incentivized to maintain their power through any means necessary; which, in a democracy, is obtaining the most votes. Because it is extremely difficult determining whether or not the drawing of a district is preferential to one party over another is, the risk to those in power is minimal while the potential payout is high. Thus, short of any moral reasoning to stop them, the likelihood of someone gaming the design of voting districts is high.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

586 Words | 3 Pages

The party that is in office might say no, gerrymandering is not cheating because it isn’t always a safe bet that the party majority in that district will win. On the opposing side, they say that it would seem to take advantage and abuse the use of voter’s census information to manipulate districts. Are voters being manipulated into voting for one party over another to change districts? “The conditions under which election ballots are cast and counted—from registration to voting equipment, ballot design, polling locations, voter ID requirements, absentee ballots and early voting—are set in a very decentralized fashion and prey to political manipulation to advantage one party over the other.” Parties that are winning elections by gerrymandering think It isn’t feasible to draw district lines perfectly, they are sometimes misshaped because of varying populations.

Read More

Summary Of Lincoln And Douglas Debates

853 Words | 4 Pages

Largely due to the government system of apportionment present which was largely based on partisanship. Proving to favor Douglas, “combined with the failure to win over the Whig districts, the apportionment doomed Lincoln’s chances of

Read More

Comparison Between Race And Gerrymandering

106 Words | 1 Pages

Hello Erik, I really like how you explain gerrymandering. I also agree with you that racial gerrymandering is worse than partisan gerrymandering. Gerrymandering altogether is bad and create a lot of problem and it mess with the result of the election. I really like it when you said “Racial gerrymandering is aimed towards a specific racial group and leads to the unfair and unequal treatment based upon race while partisan gerrymandering is not based upon race.” That pretty much sum it up

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

982 Words | 4 Pages

But recently gerrymandering has become more controversial because people feel that it has taken away their rights as a voter and it swings the votes to one side by a big percentage. Current cases are before the courts to decide if gerrymandering is legal. Some states have been discussing whether it should still be allowed during elections. “Many efforts are underway to remedy this political

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

712 Words | 3 Pages

What is “Gerrymandering”? which until now was something that never crossed my mind until I attended my Political Science class. Interestingly, Gerrymandering is a tradition vested for a political advantage by a political party to manipulate the district boundaries. Gerrymandering can also be used to utilize from a race, ethnicity, class groups or religion point of prospect, simply to benefit a political party. “The word “gerrymander” was coined at a Boston dinner party hosted by a prominent Federalist in March 1812, according to an 1892 article by historian John Ward Dean.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

1008 Words | 5 Pages

Gerrymandering Gerrymandering is the redrawing of political boundaries, otherwise known as district lines, in a state to give one party a numeric advantage over the opposing party. This is done by dividing districts up into highly irregular sections to achieve the goal of having voters from a particular party highly concentrated in some areas and thinly scattered in other areas (Donnelly, Fortune). Gerrymandering has been criticized because it violates the two basic principles in electoral designation; compactness and equality of size of constituencies in electoral designation (The Editors, Britannica). There is currently no law against the process of Gerrymandering. However, the current Supreme Court case Gill v. Whitford could change that.

Read More

Reapportionment And Redistricting Work

394 Words | 2 Pages

What is a constituency, and why do constituencies differ for representatives and senators? A constituency is a group of individual voters in a specific area who elect a representative to a legislative body. Constituencies differ for representatives and senators: • Representatives – represent a district or area of a state and sometimes a whole state • Senators – represent the whole state Explain briefly how reapportionment and redistricting work? Why is gerrymandering frowned upon?

Read More

Shelby County V. Holder's Argumentative Analysis

226 Words | 1 Pages

We see multiple successes of voting equality attempted through amendments, however, the Supreme Court’s decision on Shelby County v. Holder has pushed back years and years of effort for voting rights. Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling was in Shelby County’s favor, stating that the Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional along with Section 5. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr, who wrote the majority’s opinion, said that the power to regulate election was reserved to the states, not the federal government. As a result to the court’s decision, the federal government can no longer determine which voting law discriminates and can be passed. After the case, many states had freely passed new voting laws; the most common voting law states passed

Read More

What Is Congressional Reapportionment?

231 Words | 1 Pages

This process is called Congressional redistricting. Congressional redistricting is the redrawing of district lines according to the state’s numbers

Read More

The Effect Of Gerrymandering On Democracy

657 Words | 3 Pages

The act of redistricting can also isolate voters of a specific party. All these acts are undoubtedly undemocratic and will continue to have a drastic impact on U.S. politics unless it is

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Political Dishonesty

1293 Words | 6 Pages

A current issue in any state, more specifically Texas is political dishonesty. Dishonesty within our politicians and policies. These occurrences within our state government affects our local government as well; almost like a domino effect because whatever the state does , locally we follow. Political dishonesty has ultimately been an issue for a long period of time mainly caused by those who have a personal benefit. Weather it be for an election, a policy to be passed, or just criminals in office, whatever the case our politicians know how to sweep things under a rug and get away with crimes legally for self-interest.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

Related Topics

Open Document