ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Google Monopolies

741 Words3 Pages

Known for their major influence on the Internet, Google and Facebook have only become more popular as time goes on, leading their fields with 1.15 billion monthly active users for Facebook and Google Search having 1.2 trillion searches per year. With such a wide audience, one can begin to question whether the companies have begun to monopolize their respective social media fields. The Bloomberg article, “Soros Says Google, Facebook Are Near-Monopolies That Spur Addiction”, written January 25, 2018 by Katia Porzecanski, exposes the companies and shows statistics that prove that they not only are very near monopolies, but can also potentially be harmful to users. A monopoly is an industry that has one major supplier, and it is also illegal in most places, due to the consequences of not having competition. There are less products being sold, for higher prices, at worse qualities, all because there is no need to execute top performance because there is no competition. This article is targeting the companies of Facebook and Google and criticizing their practices, declaring them monopolies. They both are the top suppliers by far in their respective fields, effectively eliminating any other competitors. The article begins with George Soros, one of the world’s most successful investors, bashing Facebook Inc. and Google by declaring them monopolies that …show more content…

Children and teenagers worldwide suffer from the dependence of social media every day, rarely being able to go a few hours without needing to look at their phones for updates. New studies have shown that it is more difficult for the current generation to hold a face-to-face conversation than previous generations, since most communication is done online. Social media has taken over the lives of adolescents, affecting their self-esteem and real-life

Show More
Related
614 Words | 3 Pages

In the article Nicholas Carr published called “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” (Carr, 557) he explains how the Web and technology has impacted us. He also has written several books and articles about technology, business, and culture. (Carr, 556) I believe Nicholas has enough background information to be reliable for what is in his article.

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

There are tendencies in this society, to expect the worst from various forms of new technologies and how they can affect people long term. However, a counterargument states that the increasing amount of technologies people use can be beneficial in a variety of ways. Within the persuasive essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid” written by Nicholas Carr, demonstrates both opinions and elaborates on each of the arguments specified. Within this essay, I will illustrate how technologies, such as Google are not posing significant harm to its’ consumers. Arguments made within the article that demonstrate “Google” and other various forms of social media as being harmful to people, state that the overindulgence and massive exposure to a large amount of

Read More
428 Words | 2 Pages

Nicholas Carr’s article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” was published in an 2008 July/August issue of the Atlantic, argues a personal story of how deep reading for him has become difficult because of the distractions of the internet. Carr uses both personal experiences and the testimonies of others to argue that media is impacting the process of thought. Carr communicated with two other bloggers, Scott Karp and Bruce Friedman, and understands that his inability of not being able to deep read due to media alternating his thought, is shared by others too. A five-year research program conducted by scholars at the University College London observed the documents of computer logs and claimed that people are now beginning to skim or “power browse” from article to article instead of the reading in the traditional sense. Carr also admires

Read More
430 Words | 2 Pages

He goes onto say, “The human brain is just an outdated computer that needs a faster processor and a bigger hard drive. The idea that our minds should operate as high-speed data-processing machines is not only built into the workings of the internet, it is the networks reigning business model as well.” (414) The more we surf the web, view pages, and click on links the more information about us is being sent to the creators of the pages and networks. In this way the companies who own the search engines and networks gain money off of supplying the searcher with ads to click on.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

Nicholas Carr is an accomplished writer with many published works. He mostly writes about technology and culture. One of his articles from 2008, “Is Google Making Us Stupid” gives the

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

The article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” is written by Nicholas Carr. In this article, Nicholas Carr is trying to make a point that the internet has become people’s main source of information. When people rely on the internet for information, they stop reading long pieces and books. Carr talks about his own problems with reading long articles. He goes on to say how the internet is making some people money and making others lose their critical thinking skills and attention spans.

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

In the digital age, social media platforms have become an integral part of our daily lives. Facebook, the world's largest social network, has been the subject of intense scrutiny over the years due to its handling of user data and privacy concerns. In a recent article published on Vox, titled "Facebook’s data collection tactics and algorithms threaten our privacy and democracy," author Rani Molla explores the ways in which Facebook's data collection and algorithmic systems pose a threat to both user privacy and democratic values. Through a combination of rhetorical strategies, Molla successfully argues that Facebook's actions represent a clear danger to both individuals and society as a whole.

Read More
1241 Words | 5 Pages

Before the Internet, there was television, and everyone’s first addictive form of media. But once others started learning about what the Internet can do, and change the way we communicate, it grabbed people’s attention. Many argue that the Internet is the best invention yet, and will change us for the better. Except, in the paragraph starting with line 25 of the reading, Carr explains how the Google chief executive, Eric Schmidt explain how their “perfect” search engine functions. “Drawing on the terabytes of behavioral data it collects through its search engine and other sites, it carries out thousands of experiments a day, according to the Harvard Business Review, and it uses the results to refine the algorithms that increasingly control how people find information and extract meaning from it”.

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

Some people may believe that the internet is changing the world in a bad way. In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” the author, Nicholas Carr, talks about how he believes that the internet could be taking over the world. Carr believes that the world relies on the internet entirely too much. To some people, his argument could seem valid because almost everyone in today’s technological driven world look towards the internet and search engines like Google to answer their questions rather than trying to figure it out themselves and learning from their journey to find the answer.

Read More
868 Words | 4 Pages

He utilizes ethos, psychological evidence, and shared experiences of himself and authorities. Concluding his essay, he refutes Google’s glorification of technology and ambition for information by saying that the Google is trying to collect information about people and to feed them advertisement just for its economic interest. He also adds that there is a countertendency to deplore the development of technology. He cautiously shows his skepticism by arousing an image of the destruction of future human knowledge. In this digital age, people have seen many benefits of the Net, which made their browsing experience much faster and easier.

Read More
836 Words | 4 Pages

“The Internet is the first thing that humanity has built that humanity doesn't understand, the largest experiment in anarchy that we have ever had” This mystery of the internet will always stay unsolved, but in my opinion, I think that this mystical internet delivers a bad impact on one’s life in many prospects but it benefits us as well. In the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Carr tries to explain his point that the internet is playing a very crucial role in one’s life and the virtual life is taking its toll on society compared to the reality. Carr’s theory of google making us stupid is extremely useful because it sheds insight on the consequences which are a result of excessive use of the internet. The internet has directly influenced

Read More
1203 Words | 5 Pages

The reasoning stands that regulation of a monopoly obstructs competitiveness, stunting the industry’s growth. It is a competitive market that creates innovative solutions and furthers human progress. Friedman’s main example is the US railway, where the 19th century had great need for the railway system, yet with the emergence of cars and planes, railroads nearly became obsolete. Thus not only do monopolies hinder the freedom of choice they also hinder the industry by depriving it of innovation. Notably, Friedman clarifies that each case of a monopoly needs to be studied independently.

Read More
980 Words | 4 Pages

The article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” written by Nicholas Carr, arguing that Google’s easy search and result technique is causing its users to lose their ability to stay focused while reading and overall change their brains negatively. Nicholas Carr is a blog and essay writer who enjoys writing about technology and its effect on society. The publisher of this article is “The Atlantic” magazine, who are part of the market that competes with google, the source in question. Nicholas Carr when writing “Is Google Making Us Stupid” used experiences of other bloggers and semi-related historical events to argue that methods of documenting information actually have a negative effect on how we absorb and produce information. Carr begins with explaining his experience and the belief that the internet caused

Read More
1270 Words | 6 Pages

The supply and demand of information has only been modified to fit its new online format, and Google has become a main controller of the ebb and flow of this business model. “In Google’s view, information is a kind of commodity, a utilitarian resource that can be mined and processed with industrial efficiency” (Carr 10). When books were the sole authority for information, they implied that the authors owned the ideas discussed, a single voice of knowledge and the owner of this commodity (Batson, 2009, p.2), but as the internet progresses there is a shift of ownership taking place. Instead of the author being the main provider for information, the distributors or search engines have become increasingly more in control of the“product”. Often times, people bypass the association to authors entirely; they attribute their knowledge to the phrase, “Oh, I just Googled it.”

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

Nevertheless, social media plays a huge role in our society, it connects people all over the world, provides an opportunity to work or study being at home and it gives space for self-expression. Involving in numerous sorts of social media has become a daily activity for most teenagers and grown-ups. According to a survey, 22% of adolescents log on to their preferred social media site more than ten times a

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Google Monopolies

Open Document