ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Government Control Over Human Experimentation

477 Words2 Pages

Why the government should not have 100% control of human experimentation. The government would have too much control over human experimentation. They could possibly abuse their power. Human experimentation is not safe and should not use human experimentation because it's not safe. The government can abuse their power and the person might not know what the experiment is for. The first reason the government should not have control over human experimentation is that it's not safe. In the article, “Government Control” by Yong Zhen he writes “The government sometimes abuses their power and they will not stop.” Basically the quote means it is very bad if the government has too much power over everything. Overall this means the government controlling human experimentation is very bad. The second reason the government should not have control over human experimentation is because the government could control their power. This statement means that the government could make things bad by controlling human experimentation. In the article, “Government Control …show more content…

However, they should only control a small fraction of the experimentation, the people should have a vote to see if it will be tested or not. For example, in the article, “Americans Revert to Favoring Reduced Government Role” by Jeffery Jones, WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Americans have shifted back to favoring a more hands-off approach for the government in addressing the nation's problems after a rare endorsement of a more active role last year. Currently, 52% say the government is doing too many things that should be left to individuals and businesses, while 43% want the government to do more to solve the country's problems. In contrast, a record-high 54% of U.S. adults last year. This quote means that the government ruined some businesses and took too much control over things and messed things

Open Document