ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Government Control Over Human Experimentation

477 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Unethical human experimentation in the united states

Why the government should not have 100% control of human experimentation. The government would have too much control over human experimentation. They could possibly abuse their power. Human experimentation is not safe and should not use human experimentation because it's not safe. The government can abuse their power and the person might not know what the experiment is for. The first reason the government should not have control over human experimentation is that it's not safe. In the article, “Government Control” by Yong Zhen he writes “The government sometimes abuses their power and they will not stop.” Basically the quote means it is very bad if the government has too much power over everything. Overall this means the government controlling human experimentation is very bad. The second reason the government should not have control over human experimentation is because the government could control their power. This statement means that the government could make things bad by controlling human experimentation. In the article, “Government Control …show more content…

However, they should only control a small fraction of the experimentation, the people should have a vote to see if it will be tested or not. For example, in the article, “Americans Revert to Favoring Reduced Government Role” by Jeffery Jones, WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Americans have shifted back to favoring a more hands-off approach for the government in addressing the nation's problems after a rare endorsement of a more active role last year. Currently, 52% say the government is doing too many things that should be left to individuals and businesses, while 43% want the government to do more to solve the country's problems. In contrast, a record-high 54% of U.S. adults last year. This quote means that the government ruined some businesses and took too much control over things and messed things

Show More
Related
729 Words | 3 Pages

To add to this there was a lot of controversy pertaining to human experimentation, and politicians had been repeated trying to pass bills and federal laws to regulate human experimentation. The bills though were repeatedly voted down in the U.S. That was part of the problem to why all

Read More
1003 Words | 5 Pages

There are now laws that require every study to be examined and approved by committees before any experiment involve humans is

Read More
1677 Words | 7 Pages

The Primary objective of all leaders should be to control citizens. A society that allows authority to be challenged will never succeed. This source depicts an authoritarian or totalitarian view of what a governing body should look like. The author suggests that the primary objective of government should be the “control of the citizens”, and therefore that the individuals should entirely obey said government.

Read More
449 Words | 2 Pages

The government does this to control its citizens and make sure that they are doing the right thing. The government should not be able to do this to citizens because all people should have at least some sort of freedom to do whatever they want and not have to be controlled by the government all the time. I do think that the government should be able to help the people of the community and be able to watch over them at times but I think it's just wrong to control everything they do. To sum up, in both of these texts the government has too much control and power over the citizens of the community and it's simply not

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

In modern society, people have seen many different types of government and made movies concerning them. The question that human kind keeps on asking is how much control the government should have over the people since it affects people in all aspects: economic, political, social, environmental, and others. In “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut, the government in the science-fiction society controls the citizens’ freedom in order to remain in power. Kurt Vonnegut describes how the government takes over the citizens’ every move by describing the mechanisms in place such as not educating the people and the laws passed to establish control over them and to end all revolts. For example, Vonnegut describes how “the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments… [of] the Constitution… [leads] to the unceasing

Read More
270 Words | 2 Pages

He starts talking about how heartily he accepte the motto term, " That government is the bestwhivh governs not at all" He is trying to imply that a man needs to be prepared for it in order to have a government. Government shows how successfuly men can be imposed on. For an example, including themselves. If one were to judge these mens by the effect of their actions, they automatically deserve to be punish.

Read More
1323 Words | 6 Pages

This is the reason why countless people just live a life of struggle, even if they try to be different or don’t listen they can be killed. In return this causes them to live a life of fear. This type of control is just easy for them to enforce and maintain considering if they force it on you while your mind is developing then you wouldn’t know you were under control. Furthermore, in The Testing, they achieve a strong grip on the testing participants through their individuality.

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

The source is stating that a country is at it’s best when the individual is allowed to express themselves in a way that is free from government control. In doing this it allows for a society that is reflective of the individual rather than the government. When society is based on the individual, government interference will be lessened because the need for it will no longer be prevalent to society. This source is for classical liberalism and reflects the ideologies of philosopher Adam Smith who was strictly for individual benefit and limited government control. Based on historical events it is wrong to have lessened government control because it can lead to civil unrest and lack of authority.

Read More
1806 Words | 8 Pages

However, if the government were to regulate scientific advancements, the scientific world would not see much development, nor would everyday life be as efficient. In addition, science would be restricted to basic knowledge if it were not for advancements. A totalitarian government should not regulate scientific advancements because there are many negative effects that follow, such as the loss of true happiness and knowledge of the world, as told by Huxley. Government regulation of science negatively impacts knowledge of nature and its surroundings. Before the Scientific Revolution, people blindly followed the beliefs of the Church and never questioned whether or not these beliefs were true.

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

Asking about if the government should have full control over the lives of its citizens usually provokes an almost instinctual “no” to many. In 1984, George Orwell touches on a life like example of a government that completely controls its citizens. There are some obvious reasons to oppose governments like these such as wanting to be free on a individual dream and something as thought provoking like the imperfectness of human nature. But, a government should not have full control over its citizens because the government exists to protect one’s rights.

Read More
1050 Words | 5 Pages

By exerting complete control over every aspect of citizens' lives, the government suppresses individuality and autonomy, leaving individuals with a sense that their actions and decisions are predetermined and inevitable. As a result, individuals may feel that they have no control over their lives and are merely following a predetermined

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Human experimentation can be extensively characterized as anything done to a person to figure out how it will influence him. Its principle target is the procurement of new exploratory information instead of treatment. In the event that a trial is at last advantageous to others or even to the subject himself, this doesn't imply that treatment filled a critical need. Humans have long been used as subjects for a variety of experiments.

Read More
1267 Words | 6 Pages

“Government is necessary to ensure the proper use of force... The purpose of government is to protect the individual rights of its citizens” (importanceofphilosophy.com). And, just exactly what are our individual rights? “The freedom to act, work, think and behave without retribution bestowed upon members of an organization through legal, regulatory and societal standards” (businessdictionary.com). In other words, the government was only created as a means to protect our individual rights and ensure that we aren’t judged and are free to do as we choose as long as we do not interfere with the individual rights of others.

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

Animal experimentation is unacceptable because it is unethical. The article “Animal Experimentation” it states, “many people object to the use of animals in scientific studies because the animals are denied their freedom and often suffer serious injury and discomfort.” People disagree with animal experimentation because the animals do not have the freedom to choose. Animals cannot speak for themselves to tell whether or not they want to get tested on, because of this then the animals that are tested on suffer a lot of discomfort and injuries. Another reason why animal experimentation is unethical because it is unreliable.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Government Control Over Human Experimentation

Related Topics

Open Document