Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on high stakes testing
Are high stakes testing effective
Essays on high stakes testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on high stakes testing
Are high stakes testing effective
Essays on high stakes testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on high stakes testing
1. What are some important steps in interpreting data from high stakes assessments? In order to make assessment data useful teachers must understand what information is being reported and determine if additional information is necessary to understand student performance. Specifically, for assessment results for students with disabilities, teachers would have to identify what accommodations were being used.
In Kathy William’s “Failing Our Kids” she states, “Students often initialize the judgements of the tests, as if test scores were the final word on one’s knowledge or potential”(9). This is one issue that has been around for a long time, it goes beyond the actual test scores. Standardized tests, commonly referred to as high stakes tests are very common throughout the United States. These tests such as, SATs, ACTs, GREs and etc., come with many different names but they all serve the same purpose. What makes a test high stakes is the way the testing scores are being used; for example, if the tests are used to make important decisions then they will be considered high stakes .These tests are used to measure the performance of students, determine
As a result, some schools are finding it tough to score above average on these test giving teachers no option, but to focus solely on learning outcomes that meet high stake test requirements. Additionally, students with low test score were always pressured by their teacher to achieve high test, scores and when they did not produce higher results, some educator, believed, if they punished the student they would become more serious with schooling and work hard to avoid the pressure or humiliating punishments (Hurley, 2007). I used to be an advocate of high stakes testing, but now I oppose high stakes testing sine I have seen first hand myself the damage it does to a student. Also, I several educators and professional use high stakes test results as a single indicator for measuring a person's competence or determining their future outcome, even though research has proven these tests is highly
ELEANOR ROOSEVELT STOPS UNFAIR TREATMENT TO ALL RACES AS A HERO As an ordinary woman, Eleanor Roosevelt helped make human rights for all different types of people. She was interested on how all different races were treated she quickly realized most races were treated with disrespect, she was mad at that, so she wanted to help make a change and that is what she did. Keep reading about Eleanor Roosevelt and learn more about her amazing acts for the world. Who is a hero?
: In my opinion, standardized testing is beneficial but also flawed. I agree they’re non-discriminatory because the content is equivalent for all students, but teachers are “teaching to the test,” leaving out additional learning opportunities. From experience, I believe the tests are
Leslie Rayburn is a teacher in Santa Cruz, California, and she, too, believes that this is unfair to students, and to teachers who are graded based on their students’ grades. She explains that, ‘the children who perform poorly on multiple choice standardized tests (but perhaps might perform well on an open-ended form of test) are labeled as “less intelligent’ and the school suffers” (Rayburn) Since progress of a student is mainly viewed based upon the outcome of standardized test scores, the lower-performing students are seen as “not college- ready”, which creates a roadblock to a student about where they may want to attend college. The fact of the matter is that no two students are the same, learn the same, or test the same, so standardized tests are inaccurate measurements of a student’s full learning capability and
School districts with higher passing rates are rewarded with awards and increased financial subsides while districts with lower passing rates are punished with fines and such. I understand why schools with higher passing rates are rewarded but there are few reasons why schools with lower rates are punished. Schools with lower passing rates obviously need more help than schools with higher passing rates so what sense does it make to take away money they could use to help their students? This is a major flaw of high-stakes testing that should be taken into consideration. I believe there are far better and more efficient ways to spend time
The tests narrow down the curriculum to focus on the subjects that are on the test, forgetting about the other subjects. Standardized tests cannot measure all that schools teach like how to be a problem solver. Standardized tests have not improved America’s education system. Every once in a while the world will submit their schools performance and they will be ranked with
As “Education week 's” Ron Wolk’s has said, “The system failed to educate them adequately, and now it punishes them for not being educated. " Ron Wolk is stating that with a school district failing to educate its students, these students have to pay the price by failing the test. High Stakes testing may also affect the district. Low scores could result in the reorganization of schools or a shift of resources to charter schools or private-school vouchers. Who knew that one test could severely damage a community and school
⦁ Students with Disadvantages and Disabilities: The textbook claims that critics believe high stakes testing disadvantages specific groups of students in relation to ethnicity, disibility, income, and language (Enz, Bergeron, & Wolfe 197). High stakes testing also increases the likelihood that at risk students will leave high school without a diploma, which may have an impact on their future economic success (Enz, Bergeron, & Wolfe. 197). These tests also hold all students accountable for the same knowledge, even if they have personal disabilities that may effect their test taking skills. For example, schools with a large amount of at risk students that are learning English will most likely have a harder time taking an all English high stakes test than a Caucasian student who has spent his entire life in America.
Standardized Testing: Making College Admissions “Fair” Every year , the daunting prospect of undergoing standardized testing brings anxiety to thousands of high school students, and for good reason: a student’s performance on standardized college admission exams - most importantly, the ACT and SAT - is a major determinant in deciding where they will go to college. For decades, such standardized tests have been universally accepted as part of the admissions process: proponents argue, as Syverson (2007) explains, that such tests are the only way of standardizing college admissions when students from different schools have such widely varying profiles. However, in the past several decades a growing anti-testing movement has begun to poke holes
Out of Ennis High School’s 345 students class of 2013 graduates, 43 of them were disabled. This means that out of every graduating class, about 12 percent of them are disabled. The disabled students have a graduation rate of over ninety percent, which is two percent higher than the state average for non-disabled. However, Ennis ISD has a tendency to hold back their disabled students, especially in kindergarten, where nearly one-third of them are retained, and first and second grade. These retention rates are way higher than the state averages, but this leads to almost all of them graduating, so this policy must be
In fact 70 percent of educators surveyed in 2015 say that tests are not developmentally appropriate. Furthermore many students suffer a great deal of stress because of standardized tests. What’s most shocking is that instead of lower income schools getting better after tests were implemented they have actually gotten worse. School could essentially be taught by robots. At this point most teachers in my district have to teach a curriculum that is developed by the state instead of their own curriculum.
The Great Gatsby is similar to Romeo and Juliet. Gatsby is in love with Daisy in "The Great Gatsby" while in "Romeo and Juliet" the 2013 film Romeo is in love with Juliet. Gatsby would do anything for Daisy. In "Romeo and Juliet" they would do anything for each other. Romeo and Juliet both killed themselves in the end so they could be together.
As a student in high school did you ever feel like the standardized test are helping you or making you get in to a better college? Have you ever thought about how many hours students and teachers spend preparing for the standardized test? Many hours and studying are being put into those test but are they really effective and are the test doing the students good in life? Standardized tests are really just to effective, teachers and students spend too much time on them and it’s not doing the students any good, and even it’s not doing the teachers any good. Standardized tests in schools today in Ohio should be stopped because they are causing for teachers to be evaluated by the test results of how the students do on the tests, they are having the students more stressed about school and do they benefit you in colleges and university and do they really look at how well students do on them test.