ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Humanitarian Intervention

453 Words2 Pages

Introduction

Mass crimes committed by dictatorial regimes on their own citizens are now one of the main threats to international peace and security, which makes it necessary to use humanitarian intervention as a method of enforcing the protection of human rights. During the Cold war, the notion of “sovereignty” was really strong; therefore, due to moral arguments none of the states were aiming at involving into politics of foreign states (Bellamy & Wheeler, 2014 p. 480). It was due to the fact that humanitarian interventions were contradicting with the idea of sovereignty in those years. According to realists, sovereignty means “no actor above the state that can compel it to act in specific ways” (Smith & Owens & Baylis, 2014 p.4). This view …show more content…

Therefore, humanitarian interventions grew stronger in post- Cold war world with the assumption of changing worldviews for better; however, most of the states were not aimed at humanitarian purposes but were protecting the interests of their country. Although, the humanitarian interventions are not only well known nowadays but, also, one of the most questionable views in the 21st century, which are becoming less acceptable in relation to foreign policy. However, in recent decades, the idea of humanitarian intervention has evolved significantly, moving from the controversial form of unilateral armed humanitarian operation to the universal principle of “responsibility to protect, RtoP” (Doyle, 2016, p.15). RtoP was accepted on UN summit in 2005 as a compromise solution to dealing with massive violations of human rights (Francioni, 2013, p. 6). Wherefore, RtoP is legitimating military interventions of powerful states in protecting citizens and of the weaker states (Doyle, p.15). Nevertheless, RtoP aroused a lot of controversies. According to Francioni (2013), critics argue that RtoP is a real threat to values of the sovereignty of the weak states and does not provide them enough protection (p. 23) Contemporary internal conflicts and tragedies of the civilian population raise a number of doubts about the effective and impartial fulfilment by the international community of the R2P's

Show More
Related
645 Words | 3 Pages

In the novel, Freakonomics, Levitt and Dubner share their ideas regarding the way people withhold information when it comes to publicly display their image. By connecting data from a gameshow and statistics from dating sites, the authors come to a conclusion that while discrimination remains present, it is a quality most people attempt to conceal. The way the authors present and connect their ideas is done effectively with the great use of logic, evidence and organization. Levitt and Dubner make sure to logically describe instances of discrimination that take place in real life situations. For example, they claim that the voting strategy in the game show The Weakest Link, is being influenced by unfair judgements to another player’s identity.

Read More
452 Words | 2 Pages

He then squabbled that rights tackles the distribution of power and statues; thus, rights will “check and balance” the two conventions of rights instead of depending on humanitarian aid. He furthered to annotate that the distinction between humanitarian aid and rights is vital; rights are power according to Wolff. He conveyed that, “rights give permanence and power, whereas humanitarianism seems uncertain and temporal”. He indicated that there are many principal logics for human rights and the understanding situation and human rights are continuously deriving as we perceive more about the human condition.

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

There is no doubt that the United States government made mistakes during the military’s occupation of Iraq. Outside of the fact that they should not have been there, the actions taken there were irresponsible and proved to be fatal. Once the nation was offended by US military presence, the society went into chaos. About 4,000 Americans died in Iraq alone. The United States proved to act on impulse during this tragic event.

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

As we look throughout history, governments have implemented policies and are partially responsible for the denial of human rights to a certain group. These groups include Ukrainians and Rwandans. The denial of human rights in these regions not only affect those in the region but internationally. Both Ukrainians and Rwandans were denied their human rights. Ukraine’s hope and will was in the hands of the dictator Joseph Stalin.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

The year begins, mass killings continue, and also the u. s. government has nevertheless to declare what's happening in Asian nation and Syria “genocide.” By now, the proof is overwhelming: ISIS is consistently eradicating Yazidis, Christians, sect Muslims and alternative ethnic and non secular minorities in territories controlled by the FTO. What’s at stake is quite an issue of semantics: A declaration of killing has important legal and ethical implications that might need the u. s. – and likeminded countries – to try to to no matter it takes to rescue the refugees and finish the killing.

Read More
975 Words | 4 Pages

Should the United States have attacked Iraq?       Introduction: On the 20th of March 2003, the United States commenced a war against Iraq and destroyed Saddam Hussein’s regime because they thought Iraq was a threat to the world. According to Presidents, Historians, journalists, and Politicians, it was not a necessary attack and it was a big mistake from The United States, that war was inequity and they declared war to take advantage of Iraq’s land.

Read More
1305 Words | 6 Pages

The word jihad does not only mean “a struggle or fight against the enemies of Islam”, but also mean “a spiritual struggle against one’s sin”. The definition of a crusade is: “to take part in an organization concerning a social, political or religious issue. There have been many points in history when a holy war has been waged. The Holocaust and WWII have not been called a Holy war, but millions of Jews died because the Nazi party thought their religion was wrong. Today, America is suspicious of all Muslims and we call them terrorists.

Read More
2348 Words | 10 Pages

Chapter 2: Successes Whilst it is common cause that the UN has been plagued with failures in its attempts to fulfil its purpose, it cannot be said that the UN’s Peacekeeping efforts have been without success, as is demonstrated by the Nobel Peace Prize received in 1988 by the UN for its Peacekeeping efforts. Even its greatest detractors grudgingly admit that the organisation has been not only successful in some endeavours, but instrumental in both preventative and resolutionary functions as far as conflict is concerned, and despite differing opinions on how to determine whether a UN Peacekeeping operation can be considered successful, there are certain instances which both detractors and supporters of the organisation alike agree, to varying

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

In the UNSC’s article 51, individual and collective self-defense can be authorized by the UNSC under the framework of collective security. However, genocide is never justifiable in the eyes of the UN. Perhaps the most distinguishing feature between war and genocide is the disproportionally ability of those involved to fight back. Within war there is a certain level of understanding that those engaging in the conflict will have an ability to engage in battle. However, historically in genocides the effected groups have had little to no ability to proportionately fight against their attackers.

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

INTROCUTION To translate the R2P principles to deeds will require serious commitment from all the governments who unanimously affirmed at the 2005 World Summit Outcome that “each individual State has the responsibility to protect its populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity” (UN world summit, 2005). To relies a credible implementation, it is necessary that Paragraphs 138 and 139 of the Outcome which goes to the real issue of operationalizing the responsibility to protect (widely referred to as “R2P” in English) is sincerely adhered to by all. This brief paper will cover current R2P debate and the complex issue of implementing the R2P pillars which are: Pillar one the protection responsibilities of the State (sect. II).

Read More
1498 Words | 6 Pages

The consequence of wars, the political turmoil in countries or simply a country in debt; these all warrant a need for foreign aid. Although it may seem like the obvious act to do, is it really the right thing to do? It is firstly important to note what is the fundamental characteristic of foreign aid and what it entails, both for a country providing and the country receiving it. The aspect of aid can take many forms, ranging from goods and services or capital from foreign country to country in need. As situations in different countries continue to take new forms, aid can also be provided concerning military, economic means, etc.

Read More
1925 Words | 8 Pages

The term defending creeps up on us again, the bases of humanitarian intervention is ‘defending’ allies. This concept is not recognised by the standard UN model as it is seen as invading another country’s political affairs and thus seen as a form of

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

Branding And Differentiating Genocide, War Crimes And Crimes Against Humanity Crimes Against Humanity The Worst Of all Human Crimes In this theoretical paper I will be extending on the notion of the perpetual seek for Human Rights preservation by analyzing the effects associated to the issues post the end of the Cold War and by questioning human rights violations through the acts of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. How hard it might seem, this paper does not intent to “box-in” any theory into any category, but to try to evaluate valid points of how the idea to excuse out theories to justify war for peace in the realms of HR. Human Rights are staged as a fairly new concept that begun consequently to the atrocities of WWI

Read More
1793 Words | 8 Pages

The definition of humanitarian intervention will entail: “the threat of use of force across state borders by a state (or group of states) aimed at preventing or ending widespread and grave violations of the fundamental human rights of individuals other than its own citizens, without the permission of the state within whose territory force is applied.” (Holzgrefe 2003, 18). The general understanding of humanitarian intervention is the use of military force by a state or a group of states (including through UN structures) to protect foreign nationals from intrastate abuse and conflict, without the consent of the sovereign power in the given

Read More
1620 Words | 7 Pages

And, in case of human rights violations, attention often means pressure, and, consequently, progress. To conclude, both theoretical principles and practical application of the concept backs the UN human rights debate on country-specific issues. Firstly, it is a right thing to do because the UN has to supervise that its member states will honor their commitments to their citizens and their wellbeing. Secondly, this concrete discourse has real impact on the state in question, creating pressure on the governments to behave in compliance with the international human rights law by resulting in action taken by both the UN and the public.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Humanitarian Intervention

Related Topics

Open Document