Should some images be censored? When dealing with the censorship of photos, I think it depends on the magnitude of the crisis. Images that are gory should undeniably left out. If you are able to see someone being brutalized those should also be omitted from view. However, when people see dismal images, though they may cause squabble, are needed in order to show people what is going on in the world. Who should decide? How should decisions be made? What factors should be considered? When photographers capture certain events, I believe it is ultimately the decision of the publisher. However, it does not mean that they chose the right option. In order to come to a verdict they need to contemplate whether the photo is too dreadful or repulsive