ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of International Nuclear Proliferation

627 Words3 Pages

In the contemporary political landscape, one of the most heavily discussed sociopolitical issues is international nuclear proliferation. From the rising nuclear threat in North Korea to the aggrandizement of potential terroristic threats, international relations specialists have long pondered how the fear perpetuated by the spread of nuclear weapons can be alleviated. As one can likely infer being that nuclear proliferation has not ceased, the conclusion to this dilemma cannot be met without serious contemplation. Being that different specialists operate under the pretenses of different international relations theories, there are a plethora of perspectives from which one could theorize about the two most paramount dilemmas when it comes to …show more content…

Surprisingly, this occurred quickly following the United States’ first nuclear test, as it happened less than one month after the Trinity test in New Mexico. In an attempt to explain why the nuclear strike occurred, Ryan Browne writes that “Japan was not ready to surrender unconditionally, and there was a concern that a weapons demonstration would have not done the job. Such a demonstration would have detonated a nuclear weapon in a non-inhabited but observable area to compel Japan to surrender” (2016). While some members of Truman’s administration proposed an invasion of Japan on the ground, others argued that it could prove to be very costly, as the bloodshed could take many American lives. It’s also worth noting that, at the time, Japanese Kamikaze attacks had rendered a psychological effect on many American military strategists by instilling fear that the Japanese would do whatever it took to preserve their home island. One could look at the nuclear strike on Hiroshima from two different perspectives: on one hand, it brought an end the bloody battles of World War II; on the other hand, it served as the catalyst for contemporary nuclear

Show More
Related
1394 Words | 6 Pages

Name: Course Instructor: Class: Date: Critical Book Review: Prompt and Utter Destruction Introduction Within weeks, word on the US dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki began to spread that the main reason behind the bombs was to save the lives of Americans (Bernard). It was put that hundreds of thousands of American military causalities were saved through the bombings.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

In The Winning Weapon? : Rethinking Nuclear Weapons in Light of Hiroshima, author Ward Wilson attempts to make the argument that Japan did not surrender from WWII because of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. But rather that the invasion of the Soviet Union was the deciding factor in their withdraw. He then uses this argument to indicate that our views on nuclear weapons, and how they affected Japan’s military decisions is incorrect. Wilson begins his argument looking at the Japanese’s military and political standing prior to the bombing of Hiroshima.

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

At the same time, the Allied forces were preparing to invade the Japanese mainland. It was expected that the invasion of the Japanese mainland would result in the deaths of hundreds of thousands on both sides. When President Truman learned that the atomic bomb test in New Mexico had been a success on July 16th, 1945, he knew that he now had the opportunity to end World War II with Japan faster and potentially save the lives of millions of Americans and Japanese. The United States dropped the atomic bomb on August 6th, 1945 on the city of Hiroshima, killing about 80,000 people instantly and causing extensive destruction. The following day, August 9th, the atomic bomb was dropped again on the city of Nagasaki, killing about 40,000 persons.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

On the tragic day of August 6, 1945, US Air Force deployed the first atomic bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. A few days later, the second atomic bomb devastated the city of Nagasaki. These bombs were thought to end the war between Japan and America before other countries could get involved. To this day, Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still a source of pain and shame for those afflicted and for those who survived. In the poem, “Hiroshima Exit” by Canadian Writer Joy Kogawa presents a flash back of these events that occurred during World War II.

Read More
641 Words | 3 Pages

The idea of using a nuclear weapon for war has been judged from the effects that comes with the use of enormous threat. Consequently, the politics, socio-economic, and culture within Japan altered, due to the United States strategic plan to end the war. Moreover, the bombing of Hiroshima served as an catalyst to launch the Cold War in 1947.

Read More
1826 Words | 8 Pages

Soon after the devastating blow, the Emperor of Japan announced the country’s unconditional surrender. Prior to August 6th, the power of Nuclear weapons were yet unknown as well as the consequences which came along with it. When the bomb was used, the prompt and utter destruction

Read More
1240 Words | 5 Pages

There have been few national catastrophic events that have remained relevant to each new generation of people. Some of these circumstances occurred naturally while others caused great damage purposefully. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings of World War II are among the moments in time that are recognizable to each person worldwide. Although these bombings were extremely significant during the war and lead to Japanese surrender, there are many speculations concerning whether or not the bombings were crucial for the victory of the United States. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings were both extremely necessary because other strategies of the United States to end the war would not have been as effective, the United States needed a way to intervene

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

On August 6, 1945, the united states dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima, immediately killing 80,000 people. Three days later another one was dropped on Nagasaki. Some historians say the bomb was not needed because according to the author “japan was ready to call it quits anyway. More than 60 of its cities had been destroyed by conventional bombing, the home islands were being blocked by the american navy, and the soviet union entered the war by attacking japanese troops in manchuria” (Dietrich 1).

Read More
600 Words | 3 Pages

Every year in August the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and Nagasaki (August 9, 1945) remains one of the most arguable events in the modern history. Nevertheless it is actively debated topic whether the bombings were necessary and what effect they had on bringing the war in the Pacific Theatre to an efficient end. Furthermore, what the other options were available to the United States. These very same questions were also argumentative at the time, as the American government struggled with how to use a incredibly powerful new weaponry and what the long-term impact of atomic weaponry might be, not just on the Japanese, but on domestic politics, America’s international relations, and the budding Cold War with the Soviet Union.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

On account of us presenting Japan with a fair warning that calamity was coming, it was an entirely fair match. The United States offered that if Japan were to surrender, it would be kept safe, and “refusal would result in total destruction”, as Japan was well enough aware on how to prevent and protect its citizens from disaster. However, “The Japanese military command rejected the request of surrender” in which presented the United States a signal to attack. In an odd way, “Truman believed that the bombs saved Japanese lives as well”, as it was a new start for the country ranging from plants to

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

For many decades it has been the president who is given the power to act solely on what he believes is best for our national interest when responding to a nuclear attack. Bruce Blair, in a dialogue about the president’s authority to launch a nuclear strike, clearly states that the system is meant to be quick and precise for time constraints. It is critical for there to be a system that works quickly. When detecting a nuclear attack heading towards the U.S., it is only a matter of minutes before impact. Consider how fast everything must happen in order for a quick reaction.

Read More
1798 Words | 8 Pages

The controversy surrounding the American decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan has been a spot of sore debate since the post-war period, henceforth remaining shrouded in quarrel to this day. On August 15th, 1945, President Truman sanctioned the use of the worlds first atomic weapon, decimating the city and population of Hiroshima, and only days three days later, the second was dropped on Nagasaki. The official narrative taught regarding the decision to drop the bomb, since the advent of it, and the post-war period, has been that American command brought a swift end to the war against Japan by forcing the enemy into surrender with the sheer brutality of the bomb, and hence, avoiding a full-scale land invasion of mainland Japan, ultimately saving countless American lives. However, historians

Read More
1098 Words | 5 Pages

President Truman, along with military planners, made the decision to make a great impact on Japan by using nuclear warfare on two untouched cities. They believed the

Read More
450 Words | 2 Pages

It marked the beginning of the nuclear age, ushering in an era of unprecedented technological power and existential dread. The use of atomic weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki signaled a paradigm shift in warfare, demonstrating the destructive potential of nuclear arms and the terrifying reality of mutually assured destruction. In the years following the bombing, Hiroshima emerged as a symbol of peace and reconciliation. The city’s residents, known as hibakusha, meaning “explosion-affected people,” have played a vital role in advocating for nuclear disarmament and promoting peace worldwide.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

Art Analysis: Michelangelo Michelangelo is widely considered to be one of the best, if not the best, artists of the Renaissance period. He was born in 1475, (history.com Staff, 2010) and lived to be 88 years old, so there is much to discuss about him as he had plenty of time to work on his art. Michelangelo was famous for being a master sculptor, as that was his utmost favorite art form to do. He did however paint frescoes when he was asked to, such as the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, and did a absolutely fantastic job on them.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of International Nuclear Proliferation

Related Topics

Open Document