ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

455 Words2 Pages

On August 6, 1945, the united states dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima, immediately killing 80,000 people. Three days later another one was dropped on Nagasaki. Some historians say the bomb was not needed because according to the author “japan was ready to call it quits anyway. More than 60 of its cities had been destroyed by conventional bombing, the home islands were being blocked by the american navy, and the soviet union entered the war by attacking japanese troops in manchuria” (Dietrich 1).

Dropping the bomb was the wrong thing to do because 80,000 people died. Dropping the bomb was a bad idea because people died and it scared the world.
It islick the united states is the bully on the playground and Japan is the nerd reading a book and doing it homework. The bomb dropping scared the world and everyone is scared that they will get bombed but they are still are trying to fight the U.S. …show more content…

we should have done it a different way instead of killing 226,000 people. I don't understand y we have to drop the atomic bomb just get a point across i meany are we always starting stuff. The U.S. is like the kid with the magnifying glass. The world is lick a circle we make an atomic bomb then everyone else makes on. We make weapons they make weapons. The U.S. is saying that we got to do it first to protect us but you only need protection if someone strikes first but we are always striking first. And if we made the atomic bomb to protect us then what did Japanese do to

Show More
Related
674 Words | 3 Pages

Today, Many historians argue that America should not have dropped the bomb on Japan. People believe that is was morally incorrect for Americans to completely destroy two cities in Japan with many civilians. Even though dropping the atomic bombs was a violation of International Law, it was justified because it saved more lives than killed, it was the only way the Japanese would surrender and it made America more powerful. While the dropping of the bomb seems like it killed so many people, it actually saved more lives.

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb is one of the biggest and deadliest controversial turning points in history. America’s president, Truman, decided that on August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II. President Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was considered one of the most debatable turning points. The settlement to drop this bomb was a wrong decision because this bomb killed more than 70,000 innocent people with 10,000’s dying later. Also, bombing a country that was going to surrender in a few months would not be necessary, and last but not least, the atomic bomb could give ideas for the world to start nuclear warfare.

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

Dropping a nuke on a country can cause lots of difficulty. The Americans dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was the most controversial topics in American history. Truman was the active president who made the final decision for this act. Many people believe that Truman made the correct decision while others are in complete disagreement with the decision. President Truman made the correct choice in dropping the atomic bomb because it showed the United States had power, it helped end the war quickly, and saved many lives.

Read More
372 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that that dropping the atomic bomb was justifiable and the United States made a good decision dropping it. The United States and Japan had been going at it for almost five years, it had to come to an end. Japan did not only resist, they also unleashed kamikaze attacks at Okinawa; They also ignored the calls for them to surrender Japan should of seen it coming... If you think about it if the atomic bombs weren’t used there would've actually been more lives lost. Dropping the atomic bombs actually saved lives even though a lot of people have a different opinion on the matter.

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

To end the horrific ongoing crisis, Truman made a thought-through decision to allow the two bombs to be dropped. Although over fifteen hundred thousand individual’s lives were shattered, after the two final atomic bombs were dropped, when Japan surrendered millions of lives were saved, the Soviet Union had been intimidated into leaving Japan alone, and the war was no longer prolonged after four whole years of horror.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

Japan sacrificed tens of thousands of civilian lives just to prove supreme power between the soviet union and the United States. In conclusion, In my opinion, if I were to do something about the bombing of Japan is that if I were Japan I would have surrendered because as a president or leader of the country I must keep my country safe and protected. There were many pros and cons such as starvation or ending of wars. There were huge impacts on both cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

The Japanese didn’t know that the US won’t attack Japan or get involved with the War so the Japanese attack US first without knowing that the US won’t attack Japan. The US could have just dropped the Atomic Bomb on Japan one time but the Us had to drop the Atomic Bombs Japan twice and it almost destroyed all of Japan and their navy. The US didn’t know how much power the Atomic Bombs have and they drop it on Japan and almost destroyed all of Japan. The US drop the Atomic Bomb on Japan and cause disease part of Japan and kill thousands of innocent people in Japan. The Bomb cost 25 Billion of dollars and the US wanted to test it and it killed more than 3 million Japanese people just for the test and it was a crime.

Read More
681 Words | 3 Pages

was right in dropping the bomb is because if we didn’t, then we had the possibility of losing supplies. If we were to fight on the front then we would have to supply our men with weapons, food, and clothing, making it hard to keep supplies in stock for the people back home. Paul Fussell states, “The people who preferred invasion to A-Bombing seemed to have no intention of proceeding to the Japanese front themselves”. This quote shows that people didn’t want to fight on the front so it would be a waste of our supplies that we could use for something else. And one of the most important reasons of why we would’ve run out of supplies is because trade was slow and not many countries wanted to trade so we wouldn’t have sufficient supplies.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

Read More
1116 Words | 5 Pages

In 1945, World War Two, a six year conflict, ended in the adoption of firebombing tactics, and ultimately the dropping of two atomic bombs. These two bombs dropped on the Japanese cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima devastated thousands, killing and wounding 75,000 and 150,000 people respectively. At the time this decision was one supported by many because after years of fighting they believed it would save more American lives, and prevent the need for more face to face combat between the Allied Powers and the Axis powers, which at this point only consisted of Japan. However, years after the end of World War Two many historians have analyzed the motives behind this decision. Many believe the traditional orthodox argument that dropping these

Read More
1840 Words | 8 Pages

There are many reasons why it could be argued that the dropping of the atomic bomb was justified. One reason is that Japan was warned, they were given plenty of opportunities to surrender such as the Potsdam declaration. The Declaration was issued to Japan by President Truman and the Allies of America after America had tested the Atom bomb on July 26th. The declaration was a proposition of surrender to Japan that linked directly to the dropping of the atomic bomb.

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

The destruction of the bombs was only the start; in fact, there was much more suffering in the aftermath. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was an inhuman deed, but it was done to end the war and prevent more incidents. Were the reasons to drop the bomb really worth the costs? U.S. President

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman was treating people even worst by putting them through the torture of the bomb and the resulting effects of the bomb. Time became a major factor into the decision, and dropping the bomb was a result of that fear. On the other side of the argument, the Japanese did bomb Pearl Harbor which was the catalyst that got America involved in the first place. We as a country should not need to compromise with the nation who started the battle.

Read More
236 Words | 1 Pages

I put on my radio to see what was happening in the world after world war two when I heard that the united states had dropped little boy and fat man in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I knew that the united states had just made a horrible decision, in fact some could even say it’s a decision that may come and haunt them in the future. Little boy and fat man were the names given to the 2 atomic bombs that were dropped in two cities of Japan called Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I believe that this was the wrong decision, as I believe that dropping these two bombs caused more deaths than the amount of deaths that would have occurred if the war between Japan and America carried on , sure America had the motive to commit this act as Japan did attack them first

Read More
986 Words | 4 Pages

On the same day of Japan dropping the bomb, the United States declares war on Japan and decides to drop bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki years later. The selfish action of the United States caused many innocent lives to be taken purely for revenge. The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki should not have been dropped because the bombs affected innocent Japanese lives and set a precedent for the use of nuclear weapons in the future. The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were selfish acts by the United States that backfired and killed many innocent lives and extreme damage to the cities. On impact alone, the two bombs combined killed one hundred thousand innocent Japanese lives (“Nuclear”).

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

Related Topics

Open Document