Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should juvenile be sentenced for adults
Juvenile crimes in the US
Should juvenile be sentenced for adults
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Unquestionably, the death sentencing of juvenile offenders has been relatively a controversial issue due to the aftermath of Thompson v. Oklahoma (1988) and Stanford v. Kentucky (1989), which were landmark cases that dealt with capital punishment of a minor that overturned the death sentence because it was classified as cruel and unusual punishment. In addition, the Supreme Court found that minors lack the experience, perspective, and judgement expected of adults, therefore the death penalty may be a severe punishment for minors. Besides that, the application of the death penalty for juvenile offenders is creating significant international concern with the United States being one of countries to currently allow juvenile offenders to be executed.
In a recent media article, Introduction: The Youth Criminal. Justice Act — A new era in Canadian juvenile justice?, the authors talk about what at-risk youth suffered before the signing of the YCJA. For example, a lot of juvenile offenders went to court without a representation because they either couldn’t afford one or they demonstrated little to no knowledge of the criminal justice system. This ties into the issue I’m addressing because it talks about the lack of investment the federal and provincial government put in to help troubled youth who come from an unpleasant past. This article also proposes the fact that youth aren’t given proper legal care from the moment of their arrest.
Crimes are happening around us whether we pay attention to them or not. Those crimes as dangerous as murder are committed by all ages but should younger criminal in their juvenile age received the same punishment as older criminals. On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because it violates the Eighth Amendment.(On-Demand Writing Assignment Juvenile Justice) Advocates on the concurring side believes that mandatory life in prison is wrong and should be abolish. However, the dissenting side believe that keeping the there should be a life in prison punishment for juvenile who commit heinous crime regardless of their age.
One of the most controversial debates in today’s society is whether or not the court systems should try juveniles as adults. How is trying an adolescent as an adult ethical? Although everyone should be held responsible for their actions, it is scientifically proven the brain continues to mature until at least the age of twenty five. Juveniles should not be tried as adults when they are physically incapable of thinking like one, all juveniles deserve a second chance to better their lives through rehabilitation or counseling which is what the juvenile court systems focus more on and sending juveniles to adult prisons is not only dangerous, but it exposes juveniles to more violent criminals in prison.
Juvenile Law Midterm Directions: Please answer each question in a complete paragraph (at least 4-5 full, complete sentences). 1) In what circumstances can a child’s testimony be by closed-circuit television and/or recording? Discuss the pros and cons of this (consider each side in a case).
Why are minorities commonly chosen as a threat to our local police force? There has been massive incarcerations of minorities. Some are even being murdered. With all of the incarcerations and killing going on, it has drawn major attention. Just in the year two-thousand and ten it was estimated that there had been seventy thousand and seven hundred eighty two (70,782) juveniles incarcerated in the U.S.
In the United States the justice system involves both the criminal and the juvenile justice system. Juvenile justice system is particularly for children below 18 years of age, while the criminal justice system is for the adults as described by Steinberg, Laurence, and Scott (1009). In the juvenile and criminal justice systems, both individuals are covered by privileges against self-incrimination though are treated differently in custody. For the juvenile offender, a crime committed is generally viewed delinquent, that is the child is neglectful of misdeeds.
Juvenile Detention Centers are the facilities that the government use for children that do not know how to act and are steadily getting in to trouble with either the law or in school. Some facilities do meet the requirements of education but then there are some that do not have the books or the technology to help the kids with their education. Then there are some facilities that don’t discipline the children in these facilities like they are suppose to; some let the kids do almost whatever they want and guards tend to get “cool” with the inmates, and give them more privileges than others. A juvenile commits a crime usually because of the people they surround themselves with or the things they see others doing, only because they do not realize that when you commit a crime there is always consequences that come with that crime and they do not think that because, in most cases the people they see doing illegal activity haven’t got caught.
I do not think that we should get rid of the juvenile court system. These youth are at a critical point in their life where they can still be rehabilitated with the correct tools and approaches. It would be unfair to subject juveniles to adult court due to the fact they may not even have the mental capability yet to know what is going on, or even understand their crime, or the extent of it. Furthermore, due to not having a fully developed mental status positive change such as rehabilitation can be extremely useful.
The opposition’s may think that they should be convicted as an adult because crimes are horrible things and they should be convicted as an adult rather they are an adult or not. Juveniles are often prompted by adults or even other peers to do things that they know are wrong. Teen drug rehabs states, “juveniles are more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures, including peer pressure,” (Ritter). Furthermore, committing the crime isn’t entirely their fault. Also the juvenile brain isn’t as developed as an that of an adult’s which makes them more likely to act impulsively when giving hard decisions.
It really doesn’t matter the age of the criminal, it they are committing crimes that are inherently adult in nature, then yes, these criminals absolutely should be punished as an adult regardless of their age. Our courts, shouldn’t ever allow anyone, child or adult, get away with murder. In todays world ,there are many crimes being committed Adults are not the only ones that are committed crimes In today issue is that juvenile offenders should be tried as adult in a criminal court However many disagree and they believe if these young offenders are capable of committing a crime like murder, no matter their maturity, they should be tried as adults. The criminal justice system has a very particular way in dealing with the law when it comes to young adults .
It was not until the 20th century that things started changing in the way that children were charged for an offence. Children and juveniles were charged just as much as an adult would have been. Children and juveniles were eligible for the same kind of punishment as an adult… Including the death penalty. Over the year, the attitude towards juveniles who committed or where involved in crimes started to change.
education, juvenile courts, and psychological clinic is gathering information concerning violent crimes, from which can draw a better and accurate conclusion to the public. The factors can be difficult to the public, especially when it involves with the mental and physical conditioning of a troubled teen. Additionally, each crime committed by a juvenile is the aftermath of a complication of reasons, whose backgrounds is connected with their actions. There are different psychological theories that explain a juvenile misconduct and how their genetics affects their ability to be normal citizens. Psychological Analysis Psychologists have been active scientist with juvenile delinquency for nearly a decade, providing both medical treatment and evaluative assistances for a total of psychological assessments.
Annotated bibliography Childress, S. (2016, June 2). More States Consider Raising the Age for Juvenile Crime. Retrieved from PBS: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/more-states-consider-raising-the-age-for-juvenile-crime/ More states are considering to raising the age for juvenile crimes before being tried as adult because young offender's mental capacity. The idea is to cut the cost of incarcerate young offender in adult prison and ensure offenders to receive proper education and specialized care to change their behavior. Putting children in adult prison does not deter crime.
The underlying philosophy of the juvenile system in the United States has to do with the well-being of the offenders. The focus on the system is rehabilitation, education, and protection. When in this this system, the offenders are supposed to gain all the needed tools to be able to turn their ways of life around and become a productive citizen once they are out of the system. The rehabilitation part of the system is probably the most important aspect of the program. Offenders are given the resources to become clean from drugs.