ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Lightning Energy Bar

1297 Words6 Pages

Conclusion:
It would be unconstitutional for the government to ban the use of the slogan, “Lightning Energy Bar: Lots of caffeine and sugar to light you up!”
Rule:
When determining and interpreting whether something is constitutional for the government to regulate or ban, it is important to understand "that the U.S. Constitution sets the framework for all U.S. laws, whether statutory or judicially created." This means that any statue, action, or legal ruling cannot conflict with what is stated in the Constitution, or "the Supreme Law of the Land."
The Amendments of the Constitution must be taken into consideration to see which apply to the given scenario. While applying the Amendments, it is imperative to remember that federal law comes before state law, where the federal government is authorized to make the law. There is also the interpretation of judicial philosophy. Some judges believe that the Constitution is a living, breathing document and is meant to be interpreted broadly, flexible, and in congruence with modern views points within society. While others believe the Constitution to be nonliving, this difference can cloud the interpretation of what is considered constitutional for the government to regulate.
Another area when determining if something is constitutional, is if it applies to one of …show more content…

The freedom of speech clause states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." For this situation, the part of the clause being focused on is the mention of abridging the freedom of

Show More
Related
143 Words | 1 Pages

IV. Addressing the opposition A. Argument 1 The Plaintiff has argued that this regulation is in best interest for the public and provides security for the society as a whole. They want the regulation to be considered Constitutional because it was voted on by the majority and therefore, it is in the best interest of the community and should therefore be enacted. This argument does not speak to the constitutional issue of the case. The Supreme Court’s main objective is to protect individuals and minorities from oppressive government.

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

Constitution is proposed to go about as an issue on the activities of government. The powers of the legislature are defined and limited The real contention for legal survey is that some body needs to choose or mediate what is legitimate and what is not lawful. In Marbury versus Madison, chose by the John Marshall Court in 1803, contended that the court framework, as an issue, and the Supreme Court, which is the top court in the area, has the ability to choose if an administration law, regulation or activity was Constitutional in light of the fact that the court framework is the spot where lawful matters are chosen. This is essentially what Hamilton implies in Federalist 78.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

According to this requirement, only decisions by the state, and not decisions by private parties or corporations, can violate a person's constitutional

Read More
1227 Words | 5 Pages

The Constitution is frequently thought to be the preeminent law of the United States that all laws made after it ought to maintain. Hamilton expressed that "the Constitution should be the standard of development for the laws, and that wherever there is an obvious restriction, the laws should offer place to the Constitution" (Document E). In any case, there have been times in United States history where a law has been passed that collides with the Constitution. On the off chance that the Constitution truly is the preeminent law of the United States, than any unlawful law that is passed ought to be toppled. In the event that the Supreme Court did not have the force of legal audit, than the privileges of the Constitution would gradually be taken away by new laws that contention with the Constitution.

Read More
1457 Words | 6 Pages

Congress’s power to limit freedom of speech in any way is not included in the enumerated powers listed in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution (20-21). The states, if anyone, are the only governments that might posses the power to limit free speech (21). Government officials, however, obviously have no regard for the Constitution or freedom of speech and are acting upon their own desires and values (21). Many examples of freedom of speech infringement are given throughout this book, and the author shows how these kinds of laws are enacted throughout history.

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

As stated earlier I believe that the Judicial Branch should have the right to decide if a law is constitutional or not. The court case of Marbury vs. Madison is important because it brought up this point. I believe this is true because the judicial branch is very small, they have no other checks on any other branch, and they don’t receive any money. Because they are the branch to decide if something is lawful or not they are the perfect branch to make the decision on whether something is constitutional or

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

The first amendment states that “Congress cannot enact laws limiting ”the freedom of speech or press.”’ (Kentucky Resolutions) Again, in short, this amendment is saying that the federal government is not able to pass a law that takes away someone’s right to speak their opinion. Contrary to this amendment, the Federal government did exactly the opposite of what the amendment said was allowed. The acts, passed by John Adams, take away the human right of speaking what is on the mind and using what they say to show them off as a threat.

Read More
185 Words | 1 Pages

Federalism is the different types of principle that the government enforce law to ensure the safety for citizen and non citizens. Paragraph 2 of the Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally the supremacy clause can also overtake the state laws and even state constitutions. The founding fathers decide to use federalism as a way to control the people and their actions, they believed that governmental power inevitably poses as a threat to individual citizens for life and liberty because some states may abuse their power so the government decide to make laws to prevent states from taking too much power. only the federal government can intervene with

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

Such limits are located in both Article 1 and many of the amendments. However, the constitutionality of laws is sometimes overlooked when they are being passed. In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court solidified its power to overturn passed laws that are deemed unconstitutional. This judicial review power ensures that no laws remain in effect that go against the values decided upon in the

Read More
1171 Words | 5 Pages

The Constitution gives the Supreme Court the job of deciding whether or not laws are considered constitutional and are allowed to be implemented. This is commonly known as judicial review,

Read More
671 Words | 3 Pages

There are two types of different constitutions, loose and strict. Personally, I prefer to have a loose constitution. The first stated constitution is called a strict constitution. A strict constitution is meant to be taken word for word. There is no mediating between two different points, if the constitution doesn’t say you can do it, DON’T!

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

Robert Isenhour Federal Government 110 10/10/17 Judicial Review Judicial Review had been obsolete until 1803 when the need for it arose in the case of Marbury vs. Madison, where it was then found to become a new component to the Judicial Branch. I am here to discuss why judicial review is and shall remain a doctrine commonly used in constitutional law. Judicial Review is the power for courts to review other government branches to determine the validity of its actions whether it be constitutional or unconstitutional. These ‘acts’ can be described as legislation passed by congress, presidential orders and actions, or all state and local governmental actions.

Read More
533 Words | 3 Pages

The constitution places significant restrictions on the power of the government and its ability to interfere in the lives of its citizens. For example, the constitution guarantees the right to keep and bear arms, freedom of speech and press, and the right to a trial by jury. Additionally, the constitution requires a balanced budget and prohibits the state from incurring significant

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Chapter 4 of the book We the People talks about Civil Liberties, this chapter mainly talks about the Rights that were placed in the Constitution (not in the Bill of Rights), it also talks about the Bill of Rights and it describes the rights protected by the Bill of Rights. It also talks about specific rights that work close together with the Bill of Rights and Amendments rights. One of the first Amendments that is described in great detail is Freedom of Speech and Religion. The first Amendment protects US citizens right to talk about almost any topic in the United States. I said almost any topic because there are some forms of speech that aren’t protected by the First Amendment (these forms of speech can be limited or prohibited), some of the forms of speech that aren’t protected by the First Amendment are Fighting Words and Hate Speech, Student Speech, Libel and Slander speech.

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

As human beings, we are all born with an entitlement of freedom of speech or synonymously known as freedom of expression as it is a basic human right. It is stated in the Federal Constitution and it is important for us human beings to protect our rights to freedom of speech and expression as it is the backbone for a democratic society. Having the right to express oneself freely without any restrictions is an essential part of what it means to be a free human being. Article 10 in the Federal Constitution states that; (a) every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression; (b) all citizens have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms; (c) all citizens have the right to form associations.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Lightning Energy Bar

Related Topics

Open Document