When writing the constitution, the delegates at the Philadelphia convention leaned towards a stronger government than was in place under the Articles of Confederation. However, they kept the government limited to prevent tyranny from occurring. The Constitution was set in place to provide limits for government powers. The simplest way that the Constitution protected against tyranny was by establishing a republican form of government. This means that the people of the nation are represented by electing the officials that they believe are the best candidates to serve in the government. The delegates did not forget the pain of “taxation without representation” which was a large problem when they were under the rule of Great Britain, so they were sure to give a voice to the people. Nevertheless, the framers did not want government officials to …show more content…
The checks on and sharing of legislative power was the basis of protecting the interests of the nation. For example, when bills are in the process of being passed into law, a majority from both houses of Congress is needed. If the bill makes it past Congress, the President has to sign the bill into law, or he can veto the law depending on if he agrees with it or not. These obstacles make it harder for laws to be passed that do not uphold the best wishes of the nation. If any law is passed, it must follow the limits directly put on Congress by the Constitution. Such limits are located in both Article 1 and many of the amendments. However, the constitutionality of laws is sometimes overlooked when they are being passed. In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court solidified its power to overturn passed laws that are deemed unconstitutional. This judicial review power ensures that no laws remain in effect that go against the values decided upon in the