ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Bombs

460 Words2 Pages

It won’t be because of a Maya prophesy, but humanity may meet its doom someday. Human’s ingenuity could eventually bring about its own destruction. However, in some occasion human have no choice, but do what needed to be done for the survival of their community. Erich Fromm quotes to one of his articles that “If mankind commits suicide it will be because people will obey those who command them push the deadly buttons; because they will obey the archaic passion of fear, hate, and greed (157).” Considered from all that he said, it would take a considerable number of nuclear bombs to wipe out all of the humanity. The deaths of approximate three million to 16 million people from the result of the initial blasts and radiation. According to the nuclear bomb’s models, an exchange of 100 nuclear bombs at 15-kilotonnes each would stimulate a nuclear winter which would cause a decade-long famine that could kill billions of people- a condition from which human civilization might not be able to recover. …show more content…

There is a price to pay for being obedient, but if the price is to free your country, your family from being dominated? That's what soldiers are trained to do. In the military, the obedience to the officer in command is absolute, even though it might be killing innocent people. Some normal people might realize the military is cruel and unethical in their means because all soldiers are carrying weapons, a tool that is used to kill. However, the objective of the military will always be esteemed, honorable, and respectful. The soldiers serve and protect their community. The need of society always comes first before anything else. They are willing to put their life on the line between life and death for the sake of their nature, and their

Show More
Related
310 Words | 2 Pages

Imagine being put in a predicament whereby you have to make a crucial decision, either by dropping bombs to save countless lives or to let the enemy proceed on brutally killing thousands more…What would you do? Quite frankly I feel that the answer is a “no brainer!” Harry Truman’s decision, the president of the US, on dropping atomic bombs upon Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Japan was the one who first attacked the American Pearl harbour, and up until this time America was completely neutral during the war.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

The soldiers’ job is to kill in order to protect his country. Killing in a society is not acceptable, and yet in the military is perceived as a noble and honorable act. The bottom line is that the moral values are not individual choice, rather they are a

Read More
216 Words | 1 Pages

It 's challenging to look back at events and understand the logic of using an atomic bomb without allowing one scrap of knowledge to creep into our decision making. All of this being said, it 's still possible to come to the conclusion that using this weapon was wrong. The belief that a military blockade would end the war wasn 't believed any more than a military blockade without invasion of Germany would work. The notion that Japan was teetering on surrender is silly.

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

First off, not disagree with the decisions of the president to drop atomic bombs in Nagasaki, Hiroshima. The reason why I disagree with the atomic weapons that were drawn in japan is because there were thousand of people who were killed, innocent peoples who died in that bomb drops. there were military men who died, but at the same time is was acceptable for united states to fight, and win the war. United states were discomforted the lost thousand of people, including military, 48,000 people from the united states, military, and innocent peoples. It was grave that the united states had thousands of life that are why they proposed the attack besides japan.

Read More
155 Words | 1 Pages

During 1945 Nuclear Bombs became widely used throughout World War II so we have to prepare for this because it can happen any day. The first time we used a nuclear bomb was used in July 16, 1945 in New Mexico as a test. Then on August 16, 1945 the world changed when the United States attacked Japan with a nuclear bomb. Since nuclear bombs were invented by us, Russians also invented the dangerous weapon which would lead to the Cold War and us fearing about nuclear mass attacks. Everybody knows the most convenient way to be protected from nuclear bombings was by stop, drop, and tuck.

Read More
347 Words | 2 Pages

The Atomic Bombs. The dropping of the atomic bombs on japan was not justified, giving them no warning the U.S. went through and dropped the bomb to end war faster killing thousands of people. Considering the fact that this happened during world war 2, many were left dead, hurt, and with destroyed cities, due to japan not wanting to surrender, citizens of japan and the people in japan were impacted by this action. The United States, dropped theses bombs with not one single warning, above cities, and they did it to impress Russia.

Read More
244 Words | 1 Pages

The actions authorized by President Truman on August 6, 1945 to drop an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan would be proven to be unjustified in the years that followed. Actions of this type can divide and break a once unified nation. Deciding if the united States bombing Japan was justified or not would depend on how well you know the topic. Looking deeper into the bombing will reveal the horrendous truth.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

Over half a century has passed since the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but the debate over the decision to drop it is still alive and well. While there are valid points for both sides, the evidence and reason shown leans in favor of the side protesting the dropping of the bombs. The atomic bombs have caused so many problems since they have been dropped - problems that could have easily been prevented. If Truman just stopped to assess the situation with a clearer perspective, he would easily be able to see that the dropping of such a bomb would leave lasting psychological and physical negative effects, that Japan was already in a fragile state and would have surrendered soon anyways, and that if he were to go through with the atomic bombs he should have at least warned Japan.

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

The atomic bomb should be supported by the U.S. because of the following reason. Many people supported the bombing because the Japanese were given a fair warning. The supporters argument states, “Additionally, bomb supporters argue that Japanese civilians were warned in advance through millions of leaflets dropped on Japanese cities by U.S. warplanes. In the months preceding the atomic bombings, some 63 million leaflets were dropped on 35 cities target for destruction by U.S. air forces. The Japanese people generally regarded the information on these leaflets as truthful, but anyone caught in possession of one was subject to arrest by the government.

Read More
1311 Words | 6 Pages

According to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a "dirty bomb" is one type of a radiological dispersal device (RDD) that combines conventional explosives, such as dynamite, with radioactive material. The names “dirty bomb” and RDD are used interchangeably in the media. Most RDDs would not discharge enough radiation to execute individuals or cause serious ailment - the ordinary unstable itself would be more unsafe to people than the radioactive material. In any case, contingent upon the circumstance, a RDD blast could make dread and frenzy, taint property, and require conceivably exorbitant cleanup. Making quick, exact data accessible to general society may keep the frenzy looked for by terrorists.

Read More
172 Words | 1 Pages

Atomic Bombs are devastating bombs that not only destroy everything within a huge radius, it creates the area inhabitable. After a nuclear blast, the blast zone becomes filled of radiation from the bomb, the radiation slowly kills survivors who are outside. As people are exposed to radiation, the radiation destroys their DNA, which eventually kills the person. A 1 megaton atomic bomb can cover 100 square miles, A 20 megaton blast firestorm can cover nearly 2500 square miles. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were small cities, and by today's standards the bombs dropped on them were small bombs.

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

When you are picturing men fighting for a country, you don't picture men that don't care about the country, you picture men you have a deep love for their country and the people in it. The people fighting for your country should be dedicated to your country, because at any moment and time they can escape and turn on you revealing all the military plans set into play. Men in the military fight every day and every night for our country you have to be seriously dedicated to fight for three or four days at a time with little to no rest. For example, within a physical education class it is mandatory for you to run within the class so they don't take it seriously. While a track athlete is choosing to go to practice and be on the team so they are working hard every day to stay on the

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

In 1942 scientist Enrico Fermi built the first nuclear chain reactor. The nuclear chain reactor lead to the atomic bomb and nuclear power. In the next paragraphs I will be explaining to you why atomic bombs should be illegal. Nuclear weapons are very expensive, they are terrible for the environment, and they kill a lot of people. Now lets see some facts about nuclear weapons.

Read More
414 Words | 2 Pages

Moreover, our countrymen had a choice to become anything they wanted, but they chose to defend our great country and freedom we so graciously enjoy. Now is not the time to dismiss such bravery not to mention commitment. The people of the United States need to stand by our soldiers

Read More
1042 Words | 5 Pages

The world has avoided nuclear war until now, but what if that were to change? How many nuclear bombs would it take to eradicate humanity? The last time Nuclear weapons were used in war was in 1945, on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima & Nagasaki, at the end of WWII these bombs, dubbed Fat Man and Little Boy would be considered primitive by today's standards, and were actually two different types of bombs Little Boy, the explosive that destroyed Hiroshima was a uranium gun-type bomb which was detonated by firing one piece of sub-critical material into another triggering the nuclear reaction Fat Man was a plutonium implosion-type bomb which was triggered by essentially using smaller explosives to squeeze the bomb's plutonium core In terms of explosive power, Little Boy is estimated to have been between 12

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Bombs

Related Topics

Open Document