ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

244 Words1 Pages
The actions authorized by President Truman on August 6, 1945 to drop an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan would be proven to be unjustified in the years that followed. Actions of this type can divide and break a once unified nation.
Deciding if the united States bombing Japan was justified or not would depend on how well you know the topic. Looking deeper into the bombing will reveal the horrendous truth. After the United States dropped both bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki over 210,000 military and nonmilitary people were killed. Having thousands more fall victim to the high levels of radiation in the air. President Truman ordered that both bombs, Fat Boy and Little Man, be used against Japan in no time. President Truman with knowledge knew that
Show More
Related
636 Words | 3 Pages

On August 6, 1945, the U.S. made history with a fatal blow to the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that ended WWII. To this day there is a controversy on whether the dropping of the atomic bomb, ordered by President Harry S. Truman, was justified or not, but in fact, it was. Thousands of Japanese would perish, but this act would, in turn, saved American lives and end the war. Throughout various battles, the Japanese consistently crossed lines of ethics of warfare, and in an attempt to bring justice and an end to the war Truman put forth a plan to bomb Japan. President Truman warned Japan of the upcoming attack and gave demands, but in the end, the Japanese denied those negotiations which led to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Read More
310 Words | 2 Pages

Imagine being put in a predicament whereby you have to make a crucial decision, either by dropping bombs to save countless lives or to let the enemy proceed on brutally killing thousands more…What would you do? Quite frankly I feel that the answer is a “no brainer!” Harry Truman’s decision, the president of the US, on dropping atomic bombs upon Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Japan was the one who first attacked the American Pearl harbour, and up until this time America was completely neutral during the war.

Read More
179 Words | 1 Pages

President Harry Truman was justified in dropping the atomic bomb since it saved millions of American lives by ending the war as soon as possible, and established the United States as the greatest country in the world. With the bomb, America could “attack those that have hurt [America]” and save many American lives (Truman, Doc A). As part as revenge for Pearl Harbor, America was able to redeem itself against Japan with this bomb. It would make a statement to the world and force an unconditional surrender from Japan, as fast as possible. That would end the war and potentially save millions of young American soldiers.

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

After Hiroshima, Japan still refused to surrender so Truman dropped another bomb at Nagasaki. Nagasaki ended up with around 80,000 casualties and it ended up being the last bomb that Truman dropped because Japan unconditionally surrendered. With a death toll of over 210,000 Japanese and an estimated 12 Americans, the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings have left a large mark in history as some of the deadliest bombings in history. Truman had other options aside from bombing large cities in Japan. This is why many people are split on whether he was justified or not.

Read More
347 Words | 2 Pages

The Atomic Bombs. The dropping of the atomic bombs on japan was not justified, giving them no warning the U.S. went through and dropped the bomb to end war faster killing thousands of people. Considering the fact that this happened during world war 2, many were left dead, hurt, and with destroyed cities, due to japan not wanting to surrender, citizens of japan and the people in japan were impacted by this action. The United States, dropped theses bombs with not one single warning, above cities, and they did it to impress Russia.

Read More
362 Words | 2 Pages

Was the atomic bomb really necessary? How was the atomic bomb created? Why were Hiroshima and Nagasaki chosen to be the drop site? The atomic bomb was a revolutionary weapon that was strategically placed to do the most damage and with good reason against Japan.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

Over half a century has passed since the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but the debate over the decision to drop it is still alive and well. While there are valid points for both sides, the evidence and reason shown leans in favor of the side protesting the dropping of the bombs. The atomic bombs have caused so many problems since they have been dropped - problems that could have easily been prevented. If Truman just stopped to assess the situation with a clearer perspective, he would easily be able to see that the dropping of such a bomb would leave lasting psychological and physical negative effects, that Japan was already in a fragile state and would have surrendered soon anyways, and that if he were to go through with the atomic bombs he should have at least warned Japan.

Read More
278 Words | 2 Pages

Thanks to a german scientist named Albert Einstein, The United States created the atomic bomb.     Albert Einstein came from germany to warn the president that Germany was going to make an atomic bomb.  President roosevelt then approves the making of the atomic bomb and the project later becomes known as the manhattan project. The first atomic bomb was made in Manhatten, New York, USA.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

In an article published by The Atlantic Karl L. Compton gives his take on the dropping of two nuclear warheads on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. While reflecting he comes to the conclusion that dropping the bombs was indeed the appropriate. I agree fully that this was the right course of action, as the Japanese had proven up to this point that they weren’t willing to back down. An alternative attack wouldn’t have been as potent, and dropping the nukes prevented greater casualty numbers. Keep in mind this wasn’t just a hasty decision made by our world leaders “Then, shortly before Hiroshima, I became attached to General MacArthur in Manila, and lived for two months with his staff.

Read More
2438 Words | 10 Pages

Question The United States education system often presents a narrative through textbooks, curriculum and teaching methods that emphasizes American military power and the need to end the war. This narrative simultaneously neglects the perspectives and experiences of Japanese civilians, downplays the ethical implications of the bombings, and overlooks the historical context in which the decision to use nuclear weapons was made. According to historian Michael D. Gordin, "In many cases, the narrative of the bombings has been reduced to the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, without any attention to the human experience of those who were affected by the bombings" (Gordin, 2017). This neglects the suffering of Japanese civilians, many of whom

Read More
1029 Words | 5 Pages

Should the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki be remembered as a war crime or a necessary evil? As far as I am concerned, I think the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki should be remembered as a necessary evil. In my mind, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved many people whoever is American or Japanese.

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

the atomic bombs dropped on Japan in World War II were a good thing. World War II may have gone on for even longer if we would not have dropped the atomic bombs. Yes there were downsides to dropping them but there was more good. The atomic bombs dropped on Japan were a good thing.

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

Joshua Diez Mrs.Elliott English III 12 May 2017 The Atomic Bomb There are some inventions that helped shape the entirety of the world, however then their are some inventions that changed the world forever. The invention of the Atomic bomb has saved many nations as well as destroying just as many in its wake. The bomb has positives as well as negatives, it is also the greatest weapon ever produced. The creation of the atomic bomb had a positive change, demise of nations, and the twentieth century was changed for ever.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been controversal for decades. Truman’s decision is correct because Hiroshima still is a symbol of triumph ending a horrendous global conflict. Truman and his advisors were confused about whether they should bomb Hiroshima or not. Also Henry Stimson wanted to warn Japan about the bomb so they could surrenodor. But Truman also affected hundred thousand lives.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

Acting monologues are some of the most important tools beginning actors need to master to get their first acting jobs, yet many performers rush through the process of preparing their audition monologues, going straight for the emotion and never taking the time to truly understand their monologue before performing it. Of course, you have an idea of what a monologue is about even after reading it just once, but the goal is to understand exactly the weight and meaning of every word so that what you 're saying is easily understood by others who can start thinking with you. Why is it so important? Because whether you 're auditioning for Hollywood acting jobs or performing on stage, your audience is only with you if they can follow your thought process.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

Related Topics

Open Document