President Harry Truman was justified in dropping the atomic bomb since it saved millions of American lives by ending the war as soon as possible, and established the United States as the greatest country in the world. With the bomb, America could “attack those that have hurt [America]” and save many American lives (Truman, Doc A). As part as revenge for Pearl Harbor, America was able to redeem itself against Japan with this bomb. It would make a statement to the world and force an unconditional surrender from Japan, as fast as possible. That would end the war and potentially save millions of young American soldiers.
With two vastly different sides of the story, it’s impossible to say which is right. I personally believe that Truman was justified because it was arguably one of the most effective ways to end the war. Had he bombed an inhabited island, Japan likely wouldn’t have felt threatened, but his decision to bomb a city with many innocent people proved to Japan that he would stop at nothing. This fear pushed Japan to surrender, which ended the war. If WWII had continued, more people would have died over time than those who died in the
The Atomic Bombs. The dropping of the atomic bombs on japan was not justified, giving them no warning the U.S. went through and dropped the bomb to end war faster killing thousands of people. Considering the fact that this happened during world war 2, many were left dead, hurt, and with destroyed cities, due to japan not wanting to surrender, citizens of japan and the people in japan were impacted by this action. The United States, dropped theses bombs with not one single warning, above cities, and they did it to impress Russia.
Was the atomic bomb really necessary? How was the atomic bomb created? Why were Hiroshima and Nagasaki chosen to be the drop site? The atomic bomb was a revolutionary weapon that was strategically placed to do the most damage and with good reason against Japan.
Over half a century has passed since the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but the debate over the decision to drop it is still alive and well. While there are valid points for both sides, the evidence and reason shown leans in favor of the side protesting the dropping of the bombs. The atomic bombs have caused so many problems since they have been dropped - problems that could have easily been prevented. If Truman just stopped to assess the situation with a clearer perspective, he would easily be able to see that the dropping of such a bomb would leave lasting psychological and physical negative effects, that Japan was already in a fragile state and would have surrendered soon anyways, and that if he were to go through with the atomic bombs he should have at least warned Japan.
Thanks to a german scientist named Albert Einstein, The United States created the atomic bomb. Albert Einstein came from germany to warn the president that Germany was going to make an atomic bomb. President roosevelt then approves the making of the atomic bomb and the project later becomes known as the manhattan project. The first atomic bomb was made in Manhatten, New York, USA.
In an article published by The Atlantic Karl L. Compton gives his take on the dropping of two nuclear warheads on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. While reflecting he comes to the conclusion that dropping the bombs was indeed the appropriate. I agree fully that this was the right course of action, as the Japanese had proven up to this point that they weren’t willing to back down. An alternative attack wouldn’t have been as potent, and dropping the nukes prevented greater casualty numbers. Keep in mind this wasn’t just a hasty decision made by our world leaders “Then, shortly before Hiroshima, I became attached to General MacArthur in Manila, and lived for two months with his staff.
Three days later, a plutonium device known as “Fat Man” was dropped in Nagasaki. These bombs caused a massive death toll in both of the cities directly and indirectly, estimating to be around 3.17 million, instantly and for years to come. The damage caused by these atomic bomb droppings are extreme and immoral, however, considering the circumstances and events that were taking place during the second world war, the U.S. made the right decision - the lesser of two evils. The atomic bombs were a new technology of mass destruction.
Question The United States education system often presents a narrative through textbooks, curriculum and teaching methods that emphasizes American military power and the need to end the war. This narrative simultaneously neglects the perspectives and experiences of Japanese civilians, downplays the ethical implications of the bombings, and overlooks the historical context in which the decision to use nuclear weapons was made. According to historian Michael D. Gordin, "In many cases, the narrative of the bombings has been reduced to the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, without any attention to the human experience of those who were affected by the bombings" (Gordin, 2017). This neglects the suffering of Japanese civilians, many of whom
Should the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki be remembered as a war crime or a necessary evil? As far as I am concerned, I think the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki should be remembered as a necessary evil. In my mind, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved many people whoever is American or Japanese.
the atomic bombs dropped on Japan in World War II were a good thing. World War II may have gone on for even longer if we would not have dropped the atomic bombs. Yes there were downsides to dropping them but there was more good. The atomic bombs dropped on Japan were a good thing.
In 1942 scientist Enrico Fermi built the first nuclear chain reactor. The nuclear chain reactor lead to the atomic bomb and nuclear power. In the next paragraphs I will be explaining to you why atomic bombs should be illegal. Nuclear weapons are very expensive, they are terrible for the environment, and they kill a lot of people. Now lets see some facts about nuclear weapons.
Joshua Diez Mrs.Elliott English III 12 May 2017 The Atomic Bomb There are some inventions that helped shape the entirety of the world, however then their are some inventions that changed the world forever. The invention of the Atomic bomb has saved many nations as well as destroying just as many in its wake. The bomb has positives as well as negatives, it is also the greatest weapon ever produced. The creation of the atomic bomb had a positive change, demise of nations, and the twentieth century was changed for ever.
The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been controversal for decades. Truman’s decision is correct because Hiroshima still is a symbol of triumph ending a horrendous global conflict. Truman and his advisors were confused about whether they should bomb Hiroshima or not. Also Henry Stimson wanted to warn Japan about the bomb so they could surrenodor. But Truman also affected hundred thousand lives.
THE BIGGEST STUDENTS’ BOMB SO FAR OJO, MERCY Bombs are weapons of mass destruction and in military warfare, they prove to be very effective in making opponents surrender quickly like what happened at Hiroshima 50 years. Though we are gradually transiting from the era of bomb blasts from Boko Haram, there is a new Boko Haram bomb which is bigger and weightier than the bomb that is popularly known called hunger. Symbolically, it is the deadliest bomb that kills faster than the one we use to know. It takes away the will to do things you would naturally want to do.
