More handpicked essays just for you.
Problem with the aging prison population
Pros and cons of incarcerating geriatric inmates
Disadvantages of rehabilitation in prisons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
California overcrowding prisons conditions has gain National attention. The U.S. Supreme court has found that California is in violation of the 8th Amendment. California has been required to reduce their prison inmates by 40,000 inmates. California has utilized many options to reduce the inmate population within the prison system. California has to two years to reduce the inmates count in the prison system.
It shouldn’t be that way. For those who commit a lower-level crime like drug possession, petty theft, or selling marijuana, prison is not just unfair, it is also a bad sanction for society at large. Reduce sentence minimums and maximums currently on the books. If someone commits a serious crime, like robbery, they should be punished. But there’s little evidence that staying in prison for such long periods of time, such as the 20 or 30-year sentences imposed, will rehabilitate prisoners.
These inmates need more care than the average inmate. They cannot adjust to the prison lifestyle. The aging inmate cost is more expensive. The elderly have more health issues than the average inmate. The elderly are release on medical parole because of a terminal illness.
The amount of questions that we the people would have will flood our congress. Let us start with, are these prisoners in for a short amount of time or are they in for life? The crime that was committed should be taken into consideration. Why do we keep rewarding the ones that choose to keep committing crimes as opposed to the ones that never go to prison? For example, as it stands prison inmates have free health benefits, dental, three square meals, cable, a warm place to sleep in the cold and a cool place in the summer.
Should Convicted Felons be Entitled to More Rights? Everyday thousands of individuals are incarcerated into the United States prison system. As soon as these jailed individuals start their term, they give up multiple rights they had prior to being convicted. Each convicted felon is treated the same regardless of the crime they committed and lose the same amount of rights. The amount of constitutional rights taken away from convicted felons should depend on the severity of their crime.
If you are fine with mentally/physically committing a crime, then you should have to get yourself out of the hole that you just dug for yourself. Yes, I believe that there should be some kind of rehabilitation provided for them, but I also believe that they should have to earn back the privileges that they once
In this paper, I will be explaining what the three strikes law is and its purpose. I will also be explaining why the three strikes law is controversial by defining the defending arguments from the pros and cons sides. I will also use relevant facts and statistics to demonstrate the response from the public in regards to the three strikes law. Lastly I will argue, why we should eliminate the use of the three strikes law due to its injustice to not only the criminals, but also to those of us who are innocent of crimes. The three strikes law was first passed in 1993 by Washington State to keep repeated criminals off the streets along with deterring crime (Clark et al, 1997).
More care could be given to these differentiated elder imprisonment variants and less guards could be assigned given the de-escalated recidivism and violent behaviors. I do not feel any compassionate release programs are appropriate. I feel that a compassionate release program is the third link in a chain I disagree with. As description, the death penalty was prevented due to costs above life imprisonment. Now it seems that compassionate release programs are preventing life imprisonment because of cost
In the case of Andre Thomas, I believe that he should be admitted into a mental care facility before being admitted into prison rather than being sentenced to
Jail sentencing is something that every American citizen struggles with in one way or another. Not all criminals are bad & not all criminals are good. Some of the good citizens make mistakes & get charged harshly for things that they don’t deserve, but sometimes the bad citizens the actual criminals are able to beat their cases & don’t get charged as bad as the good people. Jail sentencing can make citizens go through torture. Jail sentencing should be discontinued because it can make citizens go through torture.
In 2009, California was ordered by a federal court to reduce their overcrowded prison population by 138 percent. The state had a massive incarceration rate during the “tough on crime” era (Alternative to Incarceration in California, 2015). In 1994, California had enacted a Three Strike Law. This law allows for offenders who have been convicted of a serious felony to be sentence to a prison term twice as long if they had a prior conviction. If they had two or more prior convictions then they would be mandated to a sentence of 25 years to life (California Courts,
There has been an exceedingly high increase in the population in federal prisons. “The Federal prison population has grown by 750 percent since 1980 and our Federal prisons are approximately 30 percent over capacity” (). We are overflowing our prison cells with criminals of all degrees. We need Smarter Sentencing to keep people from have long drawn out sentences and crowding up our cells for people who actually need to be there for that amount of time. Over capacitated cells are actually ridiculous.
Clearly, long prison sentences do not make a criminal act any better than they did before, which is the opposite of a corrections department. But juveniles are also affected by mass incarceration
Should these sentences be altered to provide rehabilitation services, such as community service, probation or some sort of supervised out-patient treatment? It seems though that the prison system does not have rehabilitation services in place to assist nonviolent criminals or probation services nationwide with the resources available
However, some others will spend the majority of their lifetimes behind bars. In making the decision, who will be freed by 21, 35, or which will remain behind bars, I will assume a lot has to be taken into consideration. Such as the manner a crime was committed, the type of crime, and then rehabilitation success or lack thereof. This finding helps me to understand the process a bit more and know it’s not just black and white, set in stone decision; yet, more of a greyish point to the release, no matter what by 21, makes me feel a bit
