Imagine being told that you have a fatal illness that will eventually take your life and society expects you to just sit around, waiting to die. The question of whether we should be given end of life options is a huge controversy in both the medical and legal fields today.To live or not to live is a well-known quote, but what happens when it becomes to die or not to die? People are given the right to choose to live, so why not give them the right to choose to die?
Each year nearly 42% of Americans will have someone they know diagnosed with an illness that is fatal and of those people, about 23% of those will face the issue of withholding treatment to sustain life. We are given the right to choose what we wish to do with our lives throughout our entire existence, but what happens when we come to the end of our lives and must choose how we face our last days? In a world where we value the right of life and living, we also must value the right to die as well. If people are allowed the option to withhold treatment and live “normal lives” until death knocks on their door, then a person should be able to have the decision
…show more content…
His very first documented assisted suicide was in 1990, with Janet Adkins, an alzheimer patient. From there, he helped over 130 other patients throughout the 1990s, and gave them a voice and a right to choose when and how to end their own life. Even though he was later tried and convicted of second degree murder and served eight years in prison, he helped develop a platform for end of life options. Through some of his work and in such cases like Nancy Cruzan, Kevorkian helped pave the pathway for many states to develop and adapt the Death with Dignity law that legally addresses voluntary euthanasia. The very first state to take on this law was Oregon and soon many other states