ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Secession

1222 Words5 Pages

Secession can be defined as the action of withdrawing formally from membership of a federation or body, especially a political state. Secession is discouraged heavily under international law , but According to the Declaration on Principles of International Law and the Vienna Declaration and Programme, when secession is exercised by people than it is deemed to be justified. “Under colonial or other forms of alien domination or foreign occupation” and/or is set by the Constitution (or applicable national law) of the parent state concerned.
Kosovo and Crimea both represents unilateral secession and Kosovo was cited as a precedent in case of Crimea’s secession, but secession in both the above mentioned cases is entirely different. In the former …show more content…

Following the NATO led military force, the UNMIK; UN Security Council Resolution 1244 constituted the binding legal order and hence was providing security and administration to Kosovo. No stand was taken by the UN Security Council resolution 1244 on the final status of Kosovo and leaving the matter for future Security Council decisions, simultaneously the resolution did not impede or prevent a declaration of independence. Though Kosovo's Declaration of Independence was a political matter, it was recognized by powerful states, such as UK, US, France and also most of the Security Council members.

Secondly, though Kosovar’s independence was sought outside colonialism and foreign occupation and historical events was clearly indicating that the relationship between Serbia and Kosovo were in effect similar to these contexts. The violation of human rights, fundamental rights, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing in Kosovo was recognised by Security Council and International Criminal Tribunals.
Crimea is decisively different from Kosovo on the following …show more content…

Although it was mentioned in the secession referendum that self- determination was threatened but it was self-evident that Crimea’s self-determination is not threatened.
Lastly, the secessionists or Russian population of the Crimea cannot be regarded as “a people”. As observed in the Quebec case “a people” shall be governed as “part of a colonial empire”, be “subject to alien subjugation, domination or exploitation”, be “denied any meaningful exercise of its right to self-determination within the state of which it articulate a side of it”. . And in other outlook, “self-determination has to be achieved by the peoples within the structure of their existing states”.
From all the above mentioned reasons it was found that Crimea’s unilateral secession was violating Ukraine’s territorial integrity and Crimea’s actions are unlawful under both constitutional and international law and hence, Russia’s support for such actions is also unjustified under international

Show More
Related
2669 Words | 11 Pages

Secession is the means to withdraw one’s self from a federal union or other affiliated group. The southern secession was the separation of 11 states moving from the Union to the Confederate States Popular sovereignty helped the Union and the Confederates compromise by allowing the right to vote for or against slavery knowing that the popular vote would be to be against slavery, aiding in the final decision. The motive to use the

Read More
411 Words | 2 Pages

In conclusion, the secession of the eleven states was not very successful. As we know today, there are fifty states in America, one of which is Texas. There were many outcomes to this decision, and not all benefited Texas. When the Civil War ended the North came out as the victor. After this the North set forth many plans to allow Texas back into the Union, however some were too easy and others too difficult for the South to accept.

Read More
153 Words | 1 Pages

The North had many advantages one of these was Abraham Lincoln, the north also had a larger population, and a large advantage at 5-to-two in military power. Not only were they large in population the Union was also very wealthy and controlled shipping. The North also had industrial power, more railroads, and more land. As you can see the United States had many more advantages than the Rebels, but they also have quite a few disadvantages. One disadvantage was that the Northern armies had little motivation because they weren't fighting for a cause.

Read More
2372 Words | 10 Pages

The U.S. Civil War from 1860 to 1865 was the decisive factor determining the existence of the Union or the independence of the Confederacy. The war sprouted from the Mexican American War and the land and power issues that followed, the increased wedge between the North and the South from the Dred Scott Supreme Court ruling, and the presidential election of 1860. While both Northerners and Southerners believed they were fighting against oppression, Northerners focused on the slavery issue and binding the nation back together while Southerners defended their long-standing institution. Different advantages and disadvantages on both sides helped to shape the war, with the Peninsula Campaign finally tipping the scales. At this time, wartime president

Read More
352 Words | 2 Pages

“Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.” -Abraham Lincoln. This quote was said during the civil war, a fight between the north and South, a war with the most deaths on U.S soil, and was fought mostly in the southern states of America. Texas fought in the civil war because of Texas pride, state’s rights, and slavery.

Read More
433 Words | 2 Pages

The Anti-federalist,didn't hate the federalist they just didn't agree with them in some points. They just were in favor of the states having more power than they did. Anti-federalist focused on the bill of rights and equality. They were worried that the constitution didn't equally divide power among the three branches of government. They were also concerned about giving the federal government power to regulate commerce.

Read More
139 Words | 1 Pages

The Unites States was created to protect individual rights and interests against unpredictable government power. Delegates wanted to create a better system of government that would help the nation. Although the Confederation Government was a political system of the unites Stated in the 18th century, it did not give equal power between the branches of the government and the people, however there were achievements, failures of the Articles of Confederation, and the draft of a new constitution because the united states was failing as a nation and needed to be strengthened in any way possible. In addition slavery was debated at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and the final provision satisfied southern states. The ratification of the new Constitution

Read More
99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More
150 Words | 1 Pages

The year is 1865, the Civil War has ultimately come to an end, thus eventually leading to a new chapter in American history. The Thirteenth Amendment, passed by former president Lincoln, permanently abolished slavery all throughout the Union and Confederate states. Undoubtedly, it became the solution to reconstruct the states back together, yet it brought misfortune to the freedmen and their families. As a result, great tension and hatred instantly emerged within Southern states as African Americans shared the land now equivalent to American citizens with rights. However, freedom came with a high price.

Read More
251 Words | 2 Pages

In the months following the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States, seven southern states seceded from the Union and formed the Confederate States of America. This was done primarily as a response to Lincoln’s election, as Lincoln did not support the institution of slavery, a crucial aspect of Southern society. Secession from the United States meant that these states would form a separate country from the United States with its own government and military. Some have speculated that secession was failure in democracy, that democracy should have prevented such a large part of the United States to be so unhappy with its government that it would form a new country. However, it was the American system of democracy that laid

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

So is secession of the states right? Is this what needs to be done in order to find some peace between the states? After looking at how the North and South are becoming more and more diverse and how much strife there is between the two territories, Yes, I do believe that secession needs to take place in order for there to be some settlement in the disagreements taking place. As one can see, all the states are not going to be able to come to one conclusion about the use of slaves, so if the states can form their own government aside from the union, it can become a

Read More
1422 Words | 6 Pages

The Southern and Northern states differentiate on many issues, which ultimately led them towards a Civil War. There stood deep social, economic, and political disparities between the North and the South. These modifications stemmed from the understanding of the United States Constitution on both sides. In the end, most of these disputes about the rights of states directed to the Civil War. There existed reasons other than slavery on behalf of the South 's breakaway.

Read More
1823 Words | 8 Pages

The Government is the ultimate ruler of the people, sets the ultimate laws of the land and says what goes and when not pleased uses all the means in their power to influence. The basic functions of the United States government are listed in the Constitution. Due to the immense power of our federal government, people often argue that it is too powerful and should be lessened. Sub further the state governments use a sum of power to do the same. There has been an effort to shift power from the federal government to the states.

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

As a response to the systemic, widespread and massive rape campaign carried out against Bosnian Muslims and Croat women and girls during the 1992 to 1995 Bosnian War, the 1993 United Nations Security Council Resolution 827 (UN Security Council, 1993), as a preamble to the establishment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), contains the first ever documented UN reference to rape committed during armed conflict or rape as a violation of international humanitarian law (Schott, 2011, p. 5). The United Nations has identified four types of war rape. These four types include opportunistic rape, which is random; political rape, which defines the woman as property and frequently incorporates public rapes as a means

Read More
1159 Words | 5 Pages

Secession- the act of pulling out of the union. By 1861 many southerners felt the need to secede. On December 20, 1860, South Carolina voted to secede. By February 1861 Florida, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas and Louisiana had voted to secede and formed the confederate state of America.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Secession

Related Topics

Open Document