ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

686 Words3 Pages

President Truman not have dropped the atomic bomb on Japan, as it is unnessesary, had devistating consiquences, and violated international law. On the one hand, I believe that demonstrating the devastating power of the new weapon could force Japan's surrender and bring the war to an end, saving many American lives. However, I also worry that using the bomb could lead to an arms race and a new era of nuclear proliferation. Firstly, droppping thr atomic bomb was unnecessary since Japan was already about to surrender. The US had already achieved significant military victories by the summer of 1945, such as the capture of Iwo Jima and Okinawa. The British and Americans also had successfully cut off Japanese supply lines, depriving them of food, …show more content…

Most of the victims would likely be innocent civilians, who had no involvement in the wat. I am deeply concerned about the moral implications of using atomic weapons against a civilian population. I’ve heard of the damage caused by conventional bombing raids in Europe, and I know that the atomic bomb would cause far greater destruction and suffering. I believe that using such a powerful weapon against civilians would violate international law and could set a dangerous precedent for future wars. Thirdly, the use of atomic bombs violated international law and principles of just warfare. The bombing of civilians and non-combatants is a clear violation of the Geneva Conventions and other rules of war. Furthermore, the use of atomic weapons is necessary to achieve victory, and the US could pursue alternative strategies such as a naval blockade or continued conventional bombing. Many military leaders opposed the use of the bomb, including the Secretary of War, Henry Stimson, who believes that it was unnecessary to drop the bomb in order to win the …show more content…

Just as the atomic bomb caused immense destruction and loss of life, drone strikes often result in the deaths of innocent civilians. According to a report by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, between 2004 and 2019, US drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia killed between 8,500 and 12,000 people, including 800-1,700 civilians. The use of drones violates international law and the principles of just warfare as their use often results in civilian deaths. Another modernday connnection how nucleur weapons still expist. Des[ite internal efforts to prevent proliferation of nucleur weapons, several countires still possess them, incluseign the US, Russia, Chinca, France, Pakistan, and North Korea. The atomic bomb created a constant threat just like how those countires create a constant threat and feear of nucleur war and the devestaing consequences that would

Show More
Related
540 Words | 3 Pages

Secondly, Japanese people were willing to do anything to win the war like kamikaze attacks (Doc. C). “In these kamikaze attacks, more than 3,000 ruthless Japanese pilots were killed, and there were more than 7,000 casualties among American, Australian, and British personnel (OI/http://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/first-kamikaze-strikes). This quote shows just how much japan was willing to do.

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Even though some believe that dropping the atomic bombs was a bad idea many believe that it helped end the war and save many lives of american soldiers. When the atomic bomb got dropped on japan on august 6, 1945 the goal for the U.S. was to get Japan to surrender and end the war. Before the U.S. dropped the bomb they created it and tested it on july 16, 1945 also before the dropping of the atomic bomb the U.S. gave Japan a chance to surrender. Yet Japan decided to continue fighting both times. Since they did not surrender the U.S. did drop the bombs which left japan's land destroyed and many lives taken and many wounded people.

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

Truman was the president of the United States at the time, so its obvious why he choose to drop the bomb. It would save more American lives this way. “It would have been morally wrong if we’d have had that weapon and did not use it and let a million more people die” (Doc L). If he didn’t drop it, about 400,000 to 800,000 American lives would have been lost (OI). If Japan couldn’t make war, there wouldn’t be war.

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

These lives of innocent civilians were lost on top of countless amount of people who were affected by radiation. No matter how good their reasoning for using these types of weapons, President Truman should not have used them. An argument to drop the atomic brom, from a military standpoint, is that using these weapons could put America superior over other nations. Dropping these atomic bombs would make other countries fear the United States army. With other countries fearing the United States, that could result in Americans being more safe, because no country would want to mess with our military.

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

It could roughly save 30 million people Ground invasions Dropping the Bombs The decision to use the Atomic Bomb affected the way individuals like Truman perceived the war. Even though Harry Truman’s decision affected the way the war turned he did think of how the bomb will affect Japan and its civilians. Which made me think that he did create a way to stop the war which is why, I would also believe in dropping the bombs. President Truman had three options which did make him perceive the way he will fight, 1 to continue bombing Japanese cities, 2 to invade Japan, and 3 demonstrate the bomb on an unpopulated island or an inhabited Japanese city.

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

World War II was the bloodiest war in world history that led to reorientation of both economic and social axiomatic patterns such as new conserving methods and contributing to the war effort. The violence between the United States and Japan, beginning with the bombing of Pearl Harbor, led to hundreds of thousands of casualties for both countries. To ensure a rapid victory for the United States, atomic bombs were dropped at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These nuclear bombs were authorized, to be used at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, by President Harry Truman. The decision to deploy atomic bombs in Japan was the wrong decision, due to the dwindling Japanese military power already leading to a surrender, the massive amounts of destruction brought upon Japan

Read More
987 Words | 4 Pages

During the time President Truman authorized the use of the most devastating weapon ever used against Japan in World War II, the United States was making preparations to seize the Japanese motherland. The defenses that the Japanese military were preparing had shown American strategists that there was still some fight left in a supposedly doomed enemy. High-ranking members of the military and civilians brought forth President Truman a variety of choices on how to force Japan to surrender. These choices included invading Japan, negotiating a peace settlement, bombing Japan through aerial warfare, and compressing the naval blockade. The atomic bomb would become an alternative once the bomb itself became operational.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

The final decision to drop the atomic bomb was left to President Harry S. Truman. If the bomb was not dropped, it is believed that the war would have gone on for about four more years. Truman once said, “We have used it to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans''(Doc. I).

Read More
927 Words | 4 Pages

It is understandable as to why people believe that dropping the atomic bombs was inhuman, however, the pro’s outweighed the cons of dropping the bomb. The Manhattan project was the trials and tests that the US government was doing to try and create an atomic bomb. Without Truman’s intelligence strategy and his brilliant scientists led by Julius Oppenheimer, the bomb America would have not been able to end the war. Japanese soldiers were not going to surrender, and they would fight until the last man standing. The atomic bomb dropping was the nail in the coffin for the Americans during World War II in the Pacific.

Read More
460 Words | 2 Pages

“Mankind invented the atomic bomb, but no mouse would ever construct a mousetrap.” Harry S. Truman was responsible for making the call to drop the atomic bomb on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki which killed more than 100,000 people in the impact. This event led many people to the same question: Did Truman Make The Right Decision? Even though this happened many decades ago, that decision could end with the human race.

Read More
315 Words | 2 Pages

The Atomic Bomb was only supposed to be used for defense only. In August 1945, President Truman decided to drop two atomic bombs on Japan. I think Enola Gay shouldn’t have dropped the Atomic Bomb. I’m going to tell you why.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

The war could easily end if the atomic bomb was dropped yet many innocent people would be killed. Truman had 2 other options to consider, he could send American troops to Japan but was at risk of many casualties. Truman's last option was to drop the bomb and give Japan a warning prior to using the bomb which is exactly what the president decided on. Although using the bomb brought the war to a quick end, not only did the U.S. not give a proper warning to Japan, but many innocent people died.

Read More
346 Words | 2 Pages

Atomic Bomb “The atom bomb was no great decision. It was merely another powerful weapon in the arsenal of righteousness”. This quote by Harry S. Truman is relevant to the fact that the U.S. did the right thing by dropping the atomic bomb. It was payback for Pearl Harbor. The war would have continued on for a long time.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

President Harry Truman gave an executive order in 1945 to drop to atomic bombs in popular downtown cities in Japan. With the guidance of many scientists and political leaders President Truman made the extremely tough decision to drop the bombs. After listening to arguments from both sides President Truman came to the conclusion that dropping bombs would be the best thing to do for this war. It would also show that the United States had an extreme military power. Many American politicians were for the idea of dropping the bomb, because they believed that it was the only way to end the war and get Japan to surrender.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

Related Topics

Open Document