The attack on Pearl Harbor was a surprise to the Americans. However, Japan’s plan was to destroy the Pacific Fleet for Japan to seize the resource areas needed for its southern expansion, but if they were unsuccessful, they would go to war. After the attack, President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared war on Japan. Pearl Harbor was one of the most horrifying attack that took place on December 7, 1941 at the American Naval Base near Honolulu, Hawaii.
On December 7, 1941 the Japanese sent a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor in order to keep the US with intervening with their plans. Sending two waves of over 300 aircraft, the Japanese had destroyed over 20 naval vessels and killed over 2,000 people in the process. The next day the US declared war on Japan. This was an important event in WWII because it sparked the war to become worldwide with the US going to with Japan and Germany as well. It was also the first attack in America since the Spanish-American war, and the only attack in the US during WWII.
‘We have only awoken a sleeping giant.’ That is what is believed that one Japanese official told another minutes after the attack on Pearl Harbor on 1941. On a sunny Sunday morning, December 7, 1941, the Empire of Japan carried out a surprise attack on the U.S Pacific fleet in Hawaii. After a few hours, more than 3000 Americans were killed, almost 300 U.S planes destroyed and several U.S destroyers and ships as well. This was the event that finally caused the U.S to join the fight against the axis powers in WWII.
The actions authorized by President Truman on August 6, 1945 to drop an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan would be proven to be unjustified in the years that followed. Actions of this type can divide and break a once unified nation. Deciding if the united States bombing Japan was justified or not would depend on how well you know the topic. Looking deeper into the bombing will reveal the horrendous truth.
The attack on Pearl Harbor was only done by the Japanese, but they did more than just bomb Pearl Harbor. Japanese planes bombed American bases and Manilla in the Philippines after they bombed Pearl Harbor. They took in prisoners. They have forced the already weakened prisoners to march 65 miles to a prison camp.
In Hiroshima alone around 140,000 people were killed by the end of the year because of the bombing. In August 1945 President Truman decided to drop two atomic bombs on Japan. The U.S. shouldn’t have dropped the atomic bomb. Things would have been a lot different if they didn’t drop the bombs. Historians have been arguing that the atomic bombing didn’t lead to the Japan surrendering.
The atomic bomb should be supported by the U.S. because of the following reason. Many people supported the bombing because the Japanese were given a fair warning. The supporters argument states, “Additionally, bomb supporters argue that Japanese civilians were warned in advance through millions of leaflets dropped on Japanese cities by U.S. warplanes. In the months preceding the atomic bombings, some 63 million leaflets were dropped on 35 cities target for destruction by U.S. air forces. The Japanese people generally regarded the information on these leaflets as truthful, but anyone caught in possession of one was subject to arrest by the government.
In an article published by The Atlantic Karl L. Compton gives his take on the dropping of two nuclear warheads on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. While reflecting he comes to the conclusion that dropping the bombs was indeed the appropriate. I agree fully that this was the right course of action, as the Japanese had proven up to this point that they weren’t willing to back down. An alternative attack wouldn’t have been as potent, and dropping the nukes prevented greater casualty numbers. Keep in mind this wasn’t just a hasty decision made by our world leaders “Then, shortly before Hiroshima, I became attached to General MacArthur in Manila, and lived for two months with his staff.
However, some historians have debated that, while the Hiroshima bombing helped in forcing Japan to surrender, the Nagasaki bombing was unnecessary. They claim that the two bombings were antitheses of each other: one was compulsory and the other was vicious. Several of these people include Martin Sherwin, who had noted in his book A World Destroyed: The Atomic Bomb and the Grand Alliance (1974) that the bombing was “certainly unnecessary”; and Bruce Cumings, who said that it was “gratuitous at best and genocidal at worst. (1999) Nonetheless, one historian, Robert James Maddox, observed these claims and refuted that the Japanese “would minimize the first explosion or attempt to explain it away as some sort of natural catastrophe”.
The Attack on Pearl Harbor Forever Changed the World Introduction December 7th 1941. The day 2,403 lives were lost, including sixty eight civilians* would be marked forever in United States’ history. Today Americans remember this day as the day Japan’s Navy Air Service attacked America’s Headquarters, known as Pearl Harbor, where the Pacific Navy fleet is located. Numerous amounts of ships and sailors; were lost. This not only affected the citizens of the United States, but also propelled the country into World War II (WWII).
Should Japan get bombed? Did they deserve it? Do you think revenge is the key to success? All these questions were being asked when the government was deciding to drop the bomb or not. Most say yes, this bomb should be dropped since it ended the war, but is it really worth it to kill many innocent lives?
The bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, during World War II, is still one of the most controversial and tragic events in human history. The decision to drop an atomic bomb on a civilian population raises ethical questions about the use of such destructive weapons in war. Advocates of the bombing argue that it was necessary to bring a quick end to the war and save countless lives that would have been lost in a prolonged conflict. They claim that the shock and awe of the atomic bomb forced Japan to surrender, thus preventing further bloodshed. However, critics argue that the bombing of Hiroshima was a disproportionate and inhumane act that resulted in the deaths of over 100 thousand civilians, many of them women and children.
December 7th, 1941, is one of the most infamous dates in American history. On this day, at 7:55am, Japan launched a devastating surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, catapulting America’s involvement in World War II. Japan had intended the attack to be a preventative measure in order to keep the U.S. Pacific Fleet from interfering with their military actions. The assault lasted two hours, and the Japanese managed to dismantle the American Fleet, destroying nearly 20 naval vessels, including eight enormous battleships, and more than 300 airplanes! More than 2,000 American soldiers and sailors lost their lives, and another 1,000 were wounded.
The idea of dropping such a devastating weapon on a civilian population is troubling. It seems morally and ethically there must be an alternative. The bombing of civilians is barbaric and cruel, but through the years we have lost sight of our morals and ethic beliefs on the value of human life and the innocence of civilians. The use of an atomic bomb seems like the easy way to end a long and drawn out war, but it is also the coward's way of avoiding further conflict. The mass genocide of civilians goes against everything that we as Americans believe is right.
A woman has every right to choose what to do with her body whether she will save the fetus or terminate the fetation, because of the solid reasons. Outlawing abortion doesn’t make it go away, it only makes it more dangerous. So what is abortion? An abortion is a procedure a woman can choose to end her pregnancy. A women chooses this for many different reasons.
