ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

417 Words2 Pages
In Hiroshima alone around 140,000 people were killed by the end of the year because of the bombing. In August 1945 President Truman decided to drop two atomic bombs on Japan. The U.S. shouldn’t have dropped the atomic bomb. Things would have been a lot different if they didn’t drop the bombs. Historians have been arguing that the atomic bombing didn’t lead to the Japan surrendering. There are many reasons why the U.S. shouldn’t have dropped the bombs on Japan. If the U.S. hadn’t dropped the bomb the Cold War probably wouldn’t have happened as fast. Hydrogen bombs might also have been made later than they were. So it not only affected Japan but it also affected other countries, including us because we helped make the atmosphere weaker when
Show More
Related
616 Words | 3 Pages

If the U.S. did not use the atomic bomb, the war could have killed more American soldiers because Japanese soldiers fought to the death. “The U.S. had sustained more than 75,000 casualties.” (Historical Background). The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was just retaliation for Japan's bombing of Pearl Harbor. The bombing was not really about saving lives.

Read More
317 Words | 2 Pages

In August 1945 President Truman decided to drop two atomic bombs on Japan. The United states should have not of dropped the bomb on japan. There are several reasons the U.S. shouldn’t drop the bomb. The bomb hurt a lot of people, separated and hurt families, and destroyed homes and buildings. The bombings probably killed more than 200,000 Japanese civilians and maimed untold more.

Read More
138 Words | 1 Pages

American military leaders from all branches of the armed forces some prior to August 1945, some in retrospect, strongly demurred from the decision to use the bombs for moral reasons. Japan was already defeated and in peace negotiations with Russia; surrender was imminent. Moreover, Russia was willing to enter the war against Japan if necessary. Bombing dense human settlements was pretty much barbarous, immoral and would shock world opinion. Some argue a demonstration bombing away from residential areas could be used instead to force immediate surrender.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

Although, Japan had many opportunities to surrender and we told them if they didn't there would be a mass destruction. Japan chose to ignore the threat and just brush it off. So, yes, Japan deserved to be bombed, they dropped a bomb on us first we are just firing back. Plus, it ended World War II, which is what everyone wanted.

Read More
252 Words | 2 Pages

The bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, during World War II, is still one of the most controversial and tragic events in human history. The decision to drop an atomic bomb on a civilian population raises ethical questions about the use of such destructive weapons in war. Advocates of the bombing argue that it was necessary to bring a quick end to the war and save countless lives that would have been lost in a prolonged conflict. They claim that the shock and awe of the atomic bomb forced Japan to surrender, thus preventing further bloodshed. However, critics argue that the bombing of Hiroshima was a disproportionate and inhumane act that resulted in the deaths of over 100 thousand civilians, many of them women and children.

Read More
469 Words | 2 Pages

The Atomic Bomb was a great discovery for the US in terms of technology although, the bombing helped end the war, there were still cons about bombing Japan. During World War II there was a number of two atomic bombs dropped on Japan, first in Hiroshima and the second one dropped on Nagasaki. They dropped on August 6, 1945, and August 9, 1945. The main reason we bombed Japan was because of Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941. America and Japan were known for their advanced machinery of ships.

Read More
472 Words | 2 Pages

There is always a debate about if the bomb should have been dropped. In my opinion, we should have dropped the bomb on Japan. There are no other alternatives to dropping the bomb. By dropping the bomb the war would have ended early, and a psychological shock from the atomic bomb. World War II has been going on for awhile, this would be a way to end the war immediately.

Read More
1133 Words | 5 Pages

On August 6th and 9th in 1945, without any warning the world was abruptly forced into the atomic age. This happened when the first atomic bomb obliterated the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Churchill, 2013). Many Americans at the time believed that these bombings were warranted. They were convinced that the atomic bombings were the central reason Japan surrendered and bombing Japan was the most efficient and economical way to end World War II.

Read More
1017 Words | 5 Pages

The bombings also marked the beginning of the nuclear age and heightened tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War. The bombings also had devastating effects on the environment, causing long-term damage to the land and wildlife in the surrounding areas. The radiation released from the bombs had a lasting impact on the ecosystem and human health. Eventually, the bombings caused Japan to surrender to the United States, marking the beginning of the end of World War

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

Opinion Atomic Bomb Paper - Unassisted The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagaski was a tragic day in Japan, killing millions of innocent women and children working old and young ages to help the Emperor and country. This was a day that will live in infamy for many Japanese citizens. In my opinion, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagaski was the worst decision America has made to terminate war. The U.S. had an original plan before the atomic bomb.

Read More
993 Words | 4 Pages

Should the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki be remembered as a war crime or a necessary evil? Martin Luther said “War is the greatest plague that can afflict humanity; it destroys religion, it destroys states, it destroys families. Any scourge is preferable to it.” As the same logic as it, the atomic bomb used in war is not necessary. Evil is evil, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is just a war crime.

Read More
954 Words | 4 Pages

Thankfully Italy and Germany gave up in the war and it was just Japan left to fight against. Once we dropped the bombs things changed in a good way. When we dropped the bombs on Japan they surrendered and we did it, we won. If we didn’t drop the bomb the war would most likely continue and more lives would be taken away then the lives taken away when the atomic bombs were dropped. Even though many people were injured, dead, and or lost loved ones, the people knew it would

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

Dropping the nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved hundreds of thousands of American lives. The Second World War was the most devastating war in the history of mankind. Japan’s militarism widely supported the United States’ decision to drop the nuclear bomb. The Manhattan project also helped develop the nuclear bomb’s and it was inevitable that we were going to use them at some point.

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

I think the United States should have not dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the atomic bombs was too expensive and it was not really worth it, they wiped out two entire cities, and Japan was planning on surrendering. The atomic bomb they used on Nagasaki cost 2 billion

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

Related Topics

Open Document