ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

783 Words4 Pages

Should Japan get bombed? Did they deserve it? Do you think revenge is the key to success? All these questions were being asked when the government was deciding to drop the bomb or not. Most say yes, this bomb should be dropped since it ended the war, but is it really worth it to kill many innocent lives? Although, Japan had many opportunities to surrender and we told them if they didn't there would be a mass destruction. Japan chose to ignore the threat and just brush it off. So, yes, Japan deserved to be bombed, they dropped a bomb on us first we are just firing back. Plus, it ended World War II, which is what everyone wanted. The Air Force dropped many Atomic Bombs in Japan leading to many deaths.They killed about 15,000 people but they deserved it. “However, according to Japan's Longest Day, the civilian politicians were able to use the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to break the deadlock in cabinet and end the war.” (Weatherbe). The dropping of the bomb caused Japan to surrender which ended World War II faster and easier. Dropping the A-Bomb also …show more content…

Many people have different opinions on rather the bomb should have been dropped or not, it just depends on your views of war and mass killings. Many say the U.S would have won even if they didn't use the bombs but without fighting this way.. Would the war be ended without killing many of our U.S soldiers? People think the bombs were uncalled for and we could have done this another way without taking thousands of lives. While others think Japan bombed us first so it’s the right thing to do. The people in Japan were not criminals and didn't deserve to die, but they killed us Americans too and we didn't deserve it. Yes, to it ending the war because without the A-Bomb war wouldn't have ended. This bomb didn't just save the U.S, it saved lots of countries. No, because it killed many innocent people and people dying isn't

Show More
Related

Was The Us Justified Dbq Essay

480 Words | 2 Pages

Was the United States justified in dropping the atomic bombs in Japan at the end of WWII? FLASH and BOOM! On August 6th, 1945, America dropped the deadliest bomb, atomic bomb, on Hiroshima to end the WWII. Three days later, they dropped another atomic bomb on Nagasaki. They were attacking western part of Japan.

Read More

Was Hiroshima Justified Dbq Essay

697 Words | 3 Pages

Yes, it did prevent others from dying, and no, it killed hundreds of thousands innocent people. So the bombing of Hiroshima is both justified and not justified. The first point you could make is yes, the bomb was 100 percent justified and it was a good idea. War is an awful thing that our world has to go through, because many die and lots of land is damaged. An article that agrees the bomb was good claims, “On Okinawa, only a few weeks before Hiroshima, 123,000 JApanese and Americans killed each other.

Read More

World War II DBQ

813 Words | 4 Pages

Even though dropping the bomb on Japan was controversial it was the only way to end this war. Following, like what Justice Chamber said: “How to defeat an enemy that could not, would not admit defeat?”(Doc 3), Japan was different than any other country that US faced because Japan committed inhuman and selfless actions just to kill more US

Read More

Was America Justified To Be Justified Dbq Analysis

674 Words | 3 Pages

Today, Many historians argue that America should not have dropped the bomb on Japan. People believe that is was morally incorrect for Americans to completely destroy two cities in Japan with many civilians. Even though dropping the atomic bombs was a violation of International Law, it was justified because it saved more lives than killed, it was the only way the Japanese would surrender and it made America more powerful. While the dropping of the bomb seems like it killed so many people, it actually saved more lives.

Read More

1988 Dbq Essay

496 Words | 2 Pages

Since the bomb was used it showed the world the mass destruction that can be caused so it could help prevent larger destruction. Document three was written by the secretary of war and states, “The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the Japanese war” which stopped the rest of the violence between the armies (Doc 3). Death is a part of all wars but the choice of the bomb also stopped further casualties because it stopped fire raids, strangling, blockades, and the overall clash between the two sides. These two quotes demonstrate why the atomic bomb should have been dropped on purpose because the purpose of these quotes was to put an end to the war. The next agreement is that some citizens believed that the bomb should not have been dropped and other measures should have been taken to end the war.

Read More

Drop The Bomb Dbq

345 Words | 2 Pages

Therefore knowing how the Japanese soldiers think about surrendering, the millions of lives saved by ending the war quickly and shortly, and the countless warnings given to the Japanese, I think dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was warranted and

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima

543 Words | 3 Pages

On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city, Hiroshima. This, in turn, killed over 90,000 people both before and after the collision and turned 4 square miles of the city into rubble. Now, the question that comes to mind; Was dropping the bomb on Hiroshima the correct thing to do? The answer I have come up with is that it was, in fact, a good decision. It helped the war in the Pacific end quicker and decrease the number of casualties.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Two Atomic Bombs

317 Words | 2 Pages

Lots of innocent lives were taken. That’s even more true given that there was an alternative available the US could have dropped an A-bomb in or near Tokyo Bay. Such a warning shot could have persuaded the Japanese to end the war, and its humane nature would have enhanced the US’s moral standing. The atomic bombings are often framed as the only alternative to

Read More

How Is Hiroshima Bombing Justified

1232 Words | 5 Pages

Again, the Japanese had no knowledge of the bombs, causing even more devastating casualties. People have argued over the years if the atomic bombing was justified or not, and multiple points can be made on both arguments, yet I take it that the bombing on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified. Keep in

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq

209 Words | 1 Pages

Although others may think differently, this mass killing was not necessary or justified. Japan was almost completely defenseless. According to the document Was The Atomic Bomb Of Japan Necessary, Dwight D.Eisenhower left something clear. “Japan was already defeated and dropping the atomic bomb was completely unnecessary” he said. The document also stated that the Japanese

Read More

Atomic Bomb Pros And Cons

943 Words | 4 Pages

Japan sacrificed tens of thousands of civilian lives just to prove supreme power between the soviet union and the United States. In conclusion, In my opinion, if I were to do something about the bombing of Japan is that if I were Japan I would have surrendered because as a president or leader of the country I must keep my country safe and protected. There were many pros and cons such as starvation or ending of wars. There were huge impacts on both cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Read More

Why The US Dropped The Atomic Bombs On Japan?

493 Words | 2 Pages

Do you think that the US was justified in dropping the Atomic Bombs on Japan? My opinion is that I think the US was justified in dropping the Atomic Bombs on Japan because the Japan attack the US first and the US didn’t want to get involved with the War and Japan started the fight. If the US didn’t get involved with the War, Japan might attack the US again because they think they can take over the US if the US didn’t attack Japan.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

251 Words | 2 Pages

In my opinion, there was no wrong in dropping the atomic bomb, because it turned out to be a successful plan. Let’s not forget about how they had several opportunities to surrender and they chose not to. If we had invaded many of japan’s population would have been killed. It was bad that a lot of their people would have died, but in the end it was what the U.S thought was

Read More

Was The US Justified In Dropping The Atomic Bomb

1225 Words | 5 Pages

The atomic bombing of Hiroshima is a historical event that will be debated throughout the years. Was the U.S. justified in dropping the atomic bomb? On August 6th, 1945 the United States of America used an atomic bombing attack against Japan in Hiroshima, This bombing

Read More

Was Hiroshima Bombing Right Or Wrong Essay

1054 Words | 5 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima The bombing of Hiroshima is very complicated because of whether the United States was right or wrong for the bombing of Hiroshima; it was life-altering for all that were involved. In my opinion, you could easily argue for the bombing being necessary or argue for the decision to bomb as being wrong. Although it had the cost of killing thousands and thousands of people, it was still a good decision for the United States to get revenge. I feel that the United States acted accordingly based on the attack.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

Related Topics

Open Document