ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

472 Words2 Pages

There is always a debate about if the bomb should have been dropped. In my opinion, we should have dropped the bomb on Japan. There are no other alternatives to dropping the bomb. By dropping the bomb the war would have ended early, and a psychological shock from the atomic bomb.

World War II has been going on for awhile, this would be a way to end the war immediately. Italy, Germany have already surrendered and Japan is one of the countries that need to surrender. With atomic bomb being dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, most of Japan's military weapons will be destroyed. They won't have anything to fight against the United States. In addition, the atomic bomb will give the Japanese a psychological shock or trauma about the bombing. The bombing will cause a shock because of how strong the effect of the bomb is going to be, also the impact of the bomb's radiation will have a lasting effect on Japan over a few generations. This will Japan and the rest of the world aware of what the United States can do. …show more content…

I personally don't think there were any. An atomic bomb will have a lasting effect on Japan, unlike an airstrike. An airstrike will have only a small impact on Japan, it won't have a psychological impact on the Japanese people. The airstrike will only give them a boost of motivation to win the war. The atomic bomb will actually get rid of Japanese military weapons, unlike an airstrike. An airstrike probably only destroy a few of their weapons not enough to make them stop fighting in the war. If the United States wants real damage they would have to drop a number of airstrikes to make real damage, that is a waste of weapons. Why not just drop the atomic bomb and have a greater impact than releasing a big quantity of airstrikes? The atomic bomb will get the work done in a few seconds and will be more efficient than shooting bunch of

Show More
Related

Was The Us Justified Dbq Essay

480 Words | 2 Pages

They were putting pressure on Japanese government, who are in Tokyo, which is eastern part of Japan to surrender. Japan surrendered soon after attacks of atomic bombs. America’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan was correct because the Operation Downfall would have resulted more casualties, it ended the war quickly, and it provided information on how to react to atomic bombs in future. To begin with, there would be more casualties if Americans didn’t drop the atomic bombs. Operation Downfall, back up plan of atomic bombs, would have caused more casualties to both Japanese and American soldiers based on estimation of death by battle of Iwo Jima (Source3)． Also, Japanese would follow code of Bushido, and ritual suicide to prevent from surrendering (Source 5)．Although if Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not bombed by atomic bombs, these two places would firebomb anyway (Internet).

Read More

How Did The Us Affect The Bombing Of Pearl Harbor Dbq

1214 Words | 5 Pages

Neither did the U.S examine the effects their decision would have decades after. The rapidly collapsing Japanese military, the wrongful deaths of innocent civilians, and the ineffectiveness of the bombs deem their droppings as inhumane and invalid. In addition, the bomb led to

Read More

1988 Dbq Essay

496 Words | 2 Pages

Since the bomb was used it showed the world the mass destruction that can be caused so it could help prevent larger destruction. Document three was written by the secretary of war and states, “The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the Japanese war” which stopped the rest of the violence between the armies (Doc 3). Death is a part of all wars but the choice of the bomb also stopped further casualties because it stopped fire raids, strangling, blockades, and the overall clash between the two sides. These two quotes demonstrate why the atomic bomb should have been dropped on purpose because the purpose of these quotes was to put an end to the war. The next agreement is that some citizens believed that the bomb should not have been dropped and other measures should have been taken to end the war.

Read More

Drop The Bomb Dbq

345 Words | 2 Pages

The dropping of the bombs were necessary and fair due to the refusal of the Japanese to surrender, the millions of lives saved by a quick end to the war, and the warnings given to the Japanese. To begin, the Japanese soldiers have it ingrained in their brains that it is dishonorable to surrender. The author of Drop the Bomb as agreed by saying that “the Japanese have demonstrated a willingness to fight to the death”. During the war there were many times for the Japanese to surrender, but it was never done. With this in mind, they would have continued to drag out the war, which shows that dropping the bombs sped up the war which lessened the casualties.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Two Atomic Bombs

317 Words | 2 Pages

Lots of innocent lives were taken. That’s even more true given that there was an alternative available the US could have dropped an A-bomb in or near Tokyo Bay. Such a warning shot could have persuaded the Japanese to end the war, and its humane nature would have enhanced the US’s moral standing. The atomic bombings are often framed as the only alternative to

Read More

Essay On How Did The Us Enter Ww2

574 Words | 3 Pages

This tells me that Japan was trying to destroy U.S. warships, planes, and kill American soldiers, so the U.S. would not be able to stop Japan’s plans to expand its power. Another reason I think the atomic bomb should have been dropped is that if not, the loss of Americans would increase immensely. If Japan did not surrender to the atomic bomb the second time, the war would continue, which would make more soldiers all around the world die and cause financial and material damage. This shows me that a lot more American soldiers would get killed and the war would continue to destroy America and its Allies. This war was the most expensive war in the U.S. history, costing $4 trillion dollars in today’s money.

Read More

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq

1028 Words | 5 Pages

The dropping of the atomic bomb gave Japan no choice but to surrender unless they wanted to see the end of their country. Another option that would’ve ultimately led to the end of war in the Pacific, would be to invade Japan. Although this sounds logical, it is not because it would cost many more lives and take more time. “Was it necessary to drop the atomic bomb on Japan?”, taken from The New York Times, states, “The first three options were far from certain to compel a Japanese surrender quickly, however, and each posed serious military, political, and diplomatic

Read More

Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

852 Words | 4 Pages

Japan had to accept unconditional surrender; if they disagreed with that request, America would drop the bomb. What made the Japanese surrender was the retention of their emperor; anything else couldn’t have forced a Japanese surrender, including the attack of the atomic bomb. As Japan's Prime Minister Suzuki spelled out on June 9, 1945. “Should the Emperor system be abolished, they [the Japanese people] would lose all reason for existence…. [and have] no choice but to go on fighting to the last man” (Butow).

Read More

Should The United States Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

690 Words | 3 Pages

However, this simply isn’t true. Japan would have surrendered much earlier if we offered them a conditional surrender. America has been regularly fire bombing around Japan to island-hopping and slowly taking away their territory. A U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey from 1956 says that, “Japan was near surrender before the atomic attacks.” This tells us that the dropping of the atomic bomb was not necessary.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs

1297 Words | 6 Pages

The two successful bombs were known as Little Boy and Fat Man, which cost more than 2 billion dollars (Britannica Academic). Along with wasting resources if the bombs weren’t used, another defense of the atomic weapons was the lack of signs of Japanese surrender. Japanese culture is heavily influenced by propaganda, the idea of the samurai, and fighting until the last breath. Their kamikaze bombing attacks, or suicide missions intended to destroy naval ships, was a tactic used in the war, showing their extreme devotion to the war effort (Demy). One could also argue using the bombs would end the war in a few days, effectively saving more lives in the process.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

785 Words | 4 Pages

In fact, many authority figures during this time thought it best to keep the emperor in authority. Offering the Japanese a surrender in which they don't need to lose their emperor is the most ideal and would make surrender more likely. The main reason that the soldiers continue to fight is to show their loyalty and dedication to the emperor. With this idea that impacts the chances of Japanese surrender immensely, the need for the atomic bomb is just about zero. Even yet, if the Japanese were still hesitant to surrender, dropping the bomb with no notice isn't reasonable.

Read More

Who Dropped The Atomic Bomb Essay

1269 Words | 6 Pages

If I was president during World War II, and the same circumstances were in effect, I would have used the atomic bomb on the Japanese. I would have dropped the bombs because, going forth into an invasion, would have put more American lives at risk. Even though the bombs killed over 200,000 Japanese civilians, putting troops in Japan would cause casualties towards America and Japan, and would not guarantee the Japanese would surrender. If we sent troops to Japanese home land, the war would have lasted for a longer time than it would have, or even put the war at a stalemate because the Japanese would constantly fight for their emperor until the last man, if we did not use the atomic bomb. In that regard, dropping the bomb was the best way and the right decision to be used as a means to end World War

Read More

Why Was Hiroshima Justified

1840 Words | 8 Pages

If Japan agreed to the declaration, America would not drop the atomic bomb and Japan would

Read More

Hiroshima Bombing Argumentative Essay

797 Words | 4 Pages

The atomic bomb was a terrible thing. It killed 150,000 in Hiroshima and 75,000 in Nagasaki, plus many survivors became horribly disfigured from the intensive heat, and death from radiation is uncertain it may not kill the victims for days, weeks, months, or even years. (Although the bomb did save the USA from sending foot soldier to Japan, the Japanese were ready to surrender on terms that they can keep their empire and we had no need to use it). Japan was the first to feel the destructive power of the atomic bomb. Killing a quarter of a million people and costing two billion dollars of war replenish.

Read More

MAT Program: My Plan To Teach Middle School Math

1240 Words | 5 Pages

When I finish the MAT program, I plan to teach middle school math. After looking at several different teaching models, I feel that there are two models that will be the most effective models for me to use to teach my math lessons. One teaching model that will be the most effective for me to use is the model that I am the most comfortable using, the Direct Instruction Model. I feel that it is a great model to use to teach middle school math because it “teaches specific content while allowing students to develop knowledge and skills that can be practiced independently” (Kilbane & Milman, 2014, p. 85). During many math lessons, students are presented with rules and steps for how to apply math procedures or for how to solve math problems; these

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

Related Topics

Open Document