ipl-logo

Should The United States Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

690 Words3 Pages

At the end of World War II, America proposed the Potsdam Ultimatum to Japan. It was a choice of unconditional surrender or ultimate destruction, but Japan did not accept it. In August of 1942, the United States government began a top secret project called the “Manhattan Project,” designed to create a super weapon like none ever seen before. The bombs produced by this project were originally for use against Germany.. Just 3 years later, America used the two atomic bombs they created to fulfill their promise of destruction in Japan, dropping the devastating bombs in August of 1945. This was the wrong decision. America should not have dropped the atomic bomb. Firstly, the use of the atomic bombs caused trauma and suffering to millions of people around Japan. When America dropped the Hiroshima bomb, 13 year old Yoshitaka Kawamoto was in his classroom, when suddenly he was …show more content…

However, this simply isn’t true. Japan would have surrendered much earlier if we offered them a conditional surrender. America has been regularly fire bombing around Japan to island-hopping and slowly taking away their territory. A U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey from 1956 says that, “Japan was near surrender before the atomic attacks.” This tells us that the dropping of the atomic bomb was not necessary. Thousands of lives could have been spared if President Truman thought about his decision a bit more. Moreover, military historian Hanson W. Baldwin writes, “It wasn’t the use of A-Bombs that got the Japanese to surrender, but rather the US offer of a conditional surrender.” Japan concurred with America’s conditional surrender due to the promise of keeping their emperor. All the atomic bombs did was create destruction, not aid in the effort to get a surrender from Japan. Japan would have surrendered without the use of the atomic bombs if America had just offered a conditional surrender earlier in the

Show More
Related
430 Words | 2 Pages

Truman’s Decision President Truman was justified in his decision to drop the atomic bombs in Japan. Truman faced many pros and cons of his decision, however, the pros outweighed the cons. There were very few alternatives to the extreme, the casualties in the Pacific were growing and the rate the war it would save lives. Although, there were many lives lost Truman made the right decision for his country.

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

The question everyone is asking is, did Truman make the right decision? I think President Truman made the wrong decision. He chose to drop the atomic bomb on Japan. The three considerations that lead to this judgment were: A lot of innocent souls died, Japan was going to back out of the war anyway, and dropping the bomb cost Japan a lot of money to fix. Truman's decision to bomb Japan was wrong because he killed a bunch of innocent lifes.

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

This resulted in the surrender of the Japanese on August 14, 1945. Military analyst suggest that Japan was on their knees, and about to surrender. The atomic bombs were unnecessary. Later, critics even stated that the atomic bombs were a form of racism, and it would have never happened if it were on white Americans. Truman insisted that his decision was a military action, and should not be looked at any other way.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

Federalist Papers number 78 is written by Alexander Hamilton. It was also published under pseudonym Publius, which is just like other Federalist Papers. In this paper, Hamilton talked about the judiciary branch of the government. Among the three branches, judiciary is the weakest, not with the other two analogies. This department only has the power to judge what the Executive branch carry out.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

The dropping of the atomic bomb was a pivotal moment of U.S. history. Harry S. Truman was put under a lot of pressure and spent a lot of time trying to decide whether to drop the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki or not. There were many people telling Truman reasons why he should or should not drop the bomb as well. As for my opinion, I think that Harry S. Truman should not have dropped the bomb. The atomic bomb is dangerous and, in my opinion, should not have even been made in the first place because of how life threatening it is.

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

Not only did the bomb kill thousands of people, houses and buildings got burned down, causing so many to be poor and homeless. Before the U.S. dropped the bomb on the Japanese, Japanese was already losing in the war and was ready to surrender. In the document 2 it states, “The use of the barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” This text proves that the Japanese was already about to surrender.

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

The answer is very simple. America knew the risk being taken if Japan didn’t surrender and that is why America dropped a second atom bomb on Nagasaki to make sure they would surrender. In conclusion, Truman was justified in dropping the atomic bomb on Japan to end WWII. It was a demonstration and act of strategy, moral and politics.

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

“The Japanese military command rejected the request for unconditional surrender, but there were indications that a conditional surrender was possible” (The Decision to Drop the Bomb). One of the reasons why Truman was leaning towards releasing the bomb was because he wanted the war to come to a speedy end. “…the invasion of Japan could have resulted in the death of twice as many Americans as had already been killed in the European, North African and Pacific theaters”(Forbes. Miller, Henry). Truman wanted the war to come a speedy end not just because of how long it had been going on for but because of how many American lives had been taken.

Read More
867 Words | 4 Pages

The United States’ decision to drop the the atomic bomb was a strict military measure to force Japan’s unconditional surrender. In Japanese culture, fighting for their country was

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

If the atomic bomb were not dropped the war would have lasted longer, ending in more lives lost and wasted materials. Another reason that dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified is, the Japanese had already done so much damage to the US with pearl harbor, They had it coming with damage done to them. “A Kamikaze Pilot's Manual” (Document #9) In the three pictures you can see the horrifying pearl harbor attack summed up in only 3 images, before, during, and the aftermath.

Read More
1958 Words | 8 Pages

There are many people that wanted other alternatives because they viewed the releasing of atomic bombs as morally wrong and were inhuman. Some people even came up with other alternatives such as invading Japan’s mainland, but in reality most Americans wanted to avoid this at all cost, only because they thought that more Americans would loose their lives if we invaded Japan. There were also arguments that a demonstration of the effects of the atomic bomb could have been held for Japanese officials on some uninhabited islands. If this idea would have worked then we could have spared Hiroshima and Nagasaki from large amounts of devastation as well as show the power of the atomic bomb on a full scale. This is only assuming that the Japanese would have agreed to the demonstration in the first

Read More
414 Words | 2 Pages

For years after the war and even today, people have debated over a massive question. Should the Americans have dropped nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during WWII? There may never be a correct answer. In my own opinion, the U.S. made no mistake in dropping the two nuclear bombs on Japan.

Read More
230 Words | 1 Pages

The Japanese were already on the verge of surrendering, so there was no point on dropping the bomb. Also, President Truman could have just shown an image or chart of the atomic bomb, rather than actually going through with the plan. These examples illustrate how the atomic bomb will always be a big controversy, but America was right for dropping the

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine the sudden loss of 70,000 lives: 70,000 futures obliterated, 70,000 bodies decimated, and 70,000 families grieving. That was the impact of the bombing of Hiroshima. Similar results happened at Nagasaki. The decision of whether or not the United States should have dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been heavily debated for decades. The atomic bombing of Hiroshima was not a military necessity because there were other options, it was ethically wrong, and the United States was already winning.

Read More
417 Words | 2 Pages

In Hiroshima alone around 140,000 people were killed by the end of the year because of the bombing. In August 1945 President Truman decided to drop two atomic bombs on Japan. The U.S. shouldn’t have dropped the atomic bomb. Things would have been a lot different if they didn’t drop the bombs. Historians have been arguing that the atomic bombing didn’t lead to the Japan surrendering.

Read More

More about Should The United States Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

Open Document