Truman’s Decision President Truman was justified in his decision to drop the atomic bombs in Japan. Truman faced many pros and cons of his decision, however, the pros outweighed the cons. There were very few alternatives to the extreme, the casualties in the Pacific were growing and the rate the war it would save lives. Although, there were many lives lost Truman made the right decision for his country.
Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan is a book by J. Samuel Walker. He writes about the decision that Truman had to make during World War Two. The Decision that Truman had to make was whether or not the United States should use atomic bombs against Japan. The argument was that if the atomic bombs were used, then Japan would be forced to surrender. “Truman could have decided against it.
On August 6, 1945, the U.S. made history with a fatal blow to the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that ended WWII. To this day there is a controversy on whether the dropping of the atomic bomb, ordered by President Harry S. Truman, was justified or not, but in fact, it was. Thousands of Japanese would perish, but this act would, in turn, saved American lives and end the war. Throughout various battles, the Japanese consistently crossed lines of ethics of warfare, and in an attempt to bring justice and an end to the war Truman put forth a plan to bomb Japan. President Truman warned Japan of the upcoming attack and gave demands, but in the end, the Japanese denied those negotiations which led to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
President Harry Truman was a successful president by definition. He was thrust into power as the thirty-third president of the United States after the rapid decline of President Theodore Roosevelt's health. This paper is organized around several major successes of President Truman, but mainly focusing on his twenty-one point plan of reform, also known as The Fair Deal, and the Manhattan Project. In regard to Richard Neustadt’s terms, a president should be evaluated on his or her ability to persuade. Put simply, it does not matter if any adversaries disagree if you are able to persuade them otherwise.
1. Source B mentions that the reason for Truman dropping the bomb was to save American lives, but it was a speech to the nation. Source A transmits a completely different message. It mentions that “the end of Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of [the Russian] armies.” They way this phrase is interpreted is that Truman dropped the bomb because he no longer wanted the help of the Soviets so he didn’t have to share the reward, which was Tokyo.
In 1939, Germany invaded Poland starting WWII. At first, the United States remained neutral; however, the U.S. was upset that Japan disrupted the Open Door Policy. The U.S. responded by freezing Japan’s assets and cutting off oil. On December 7, 1941, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, bringing the U.S. into war. After years of fighting, President Truman decided to drop the bomb on Japan.
Being the president of the United States comes with the responsibility of making tough decisions that aren’t always perceived as the best, especially when it involves the war. In 1945, President Harry Truman had to make a difficult decision that ultimately gave americans a leg up in the war. President Harry Truman’s decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan in WWII is surrounded by much controversy but holds many positive advantages that helped end the war. Presidents Harry Truman’s decision to use the atomic bomb posed nearly no significant dilemmas overall.
Manhattan Project Texts One advantage of Truman’s approach was Stalin asked no questions. When Truman told Stalin about the new weapon, “all he said was he was glad to hear it and hope we would make “good use of it against the Japanese”.” This was good for the Americans because they wouldn’t have to share their secrets of producing the atomic weapons.
The U.S. viewed bombings as a necessity because Truman gave the Japanese a chance to surrender when he issued the Potsdam Declaration. In his message, Truman warned the Japanese that if they would not unconditionally surrender that they would be struck with “prompt and utter destruction.” Similarly, by bombing the Japanese it would spare up to 1 million American lives along with 250,000 British casualties because U.S and allied soldiers didn’t have to attempt to invade the heavily guarded Japanese territories. Another reason the United States needed to bomb Japan was dominance. The secretary of state thought it would put the U.S. in a dominant position in the postwar and have power over the Germans.
President Truman’s decision to use atomic weapons on Japan was justified because it put an end to a horrific war, saved millions, and sprung the United States armed forces. The first piece of evidence supporting the claim is how the decision made by President Truman to use atomic weapons on Japan was rightfully justified because of the Japanese war mentality. President Truman's decision was justified because the fighting in the Pacific showed that the Japanese would do anything they could to win the war, they had men purposefully ceasing themselves for the country, and held brutal camps for American prisoners of war as we learned in class, and would do anything to win the war. One piece of evidence supporting the claim “against those who have
Truman’s decision to bomb Japan was right for many reasons. One piece of evidence that shows Truman made the right decision is when Japan captured our American troops and kept them as prisoners, they beat and starved them and even went as far as executing them, he talks about this in his radio report to the American people. " against those who have starved and beaten and executed American prisoners of war" (DocF). A second piece of evidence that shows Truman made the right decision is he was just trying to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans. He talks about both of these pieces of evidence in his radio to the American people. "
Lewis Strauss, a special assistant of the Secretary of the Navy, gave a recommendation to the Secretary of the Navy, James Forrestal. Strauss said it would be better to demonstrate the bomb before actually using it (Doc H). This idea included using the bomb in a forest by Tokio. He said if the bomb blows up in a forest, then the Japanese observers could see how America could destroy any city. But there is also another reason why the bomb would be a risky decision.
What Should Truman Do? - Vice Pres. Barkley You are Vice President Alben Barkley. In a moment, you and President Truman will be hearing from a committee of advisors regarding how America should end the war with Japan. As each advisor presents, take detailed notes on what they are recommending.
The reason they say that Truman decided to drop the atomic bombs was so that they could try to get ahead of the Soviet Union. Gar Alperovitz is one of the most popular advocators for this reason. He stated that Truman dropped the bombs to demonstrate the power of America, and so that Russia could not enter the war to get new territorial acquisitions. If the Soviet Union was allowed to enter the war, then they could get some of the Japanese assets in China, which would have favored Russia greatly. Alperovitz’s conclusion was that Truman did this “to convince the Russians to accept the American plan for a stable peace”(Harry).
Would the Americans have joined World War 2 if the bombing of Pearl Harbour had not taken place? Introduction Many historians and people in general believe that the United States would have eventually joined the war on the European front, however, not many expected war with Japan to come earlier than the former. With that being said, the sense of isolationism in the US, however, was still extremely strong and prevalent, effectively impeding any possible war efforts made by Roosevelt, but then came the bombing of Pearl Harbour which, to all of history, is seen as the tipping point for the end of US isolationism policies. The very day after the bombing President Franklin D. Roosevelt spoke to parliament in his address on the attack on
