ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Constitution

751 Words4 Pages

When the Framers of the Constitution met in Philadelphia in 1787, they sought to establish a government that would not only satisfy the current needs of the nation and guard against tyranny, but serve as a guide for future generations as well. The Constitution they drafted continues to shape our country and define our government today, but the Framers could not have possibly predicted all future threats to democracy and liberty that would eventually present themselves. Although measures were taken to prevent the concentration of authority from being held by one individual or one group of individuals, such as the creation of separate branches of government that would check the power of one another, the rise of populist demagogues in the last century has raised the question of whether or not the …show more content…

The system of checks and balances and a division of power within the federal government inhibits the rise of tyranny to an extent, but does little to protect against strategic politicians appealing to the masses with a dangerous rhetoric who are “democratically” voted into office. The recent presidential election makes it clear that our outdated system allows these leaders to rise to the top, bringing with them a harmful administration that poses a threat to American citizens, and our nation as a whole. In Federalist No. 10, James Madison assured skeptics of the Constitution that “the influence of factious leaders may kindle a flame within their particular States, but will be unable to spread a general conflagration through the other States.” The idea that a large republic would prevent the corruption of government by corrupt individuals is challenged by the case of Louisiana governor and U.S. Senator, Huey Long. During the time of economic inequality and depression in the 1930s, Long attracted the support of the masses with his

Show More
Related

Federalist Vs Democratic-Republican Dbq Essay

642 Words | 3 Pages

In the late 18th century, America’s founding fathers would have never dreamed of being organized into different political factions: for they were not fans of them. In Federalist 10, James Madison, leading Democratic-Republican thinker, stated that he was skeptical of factions. In his Farewell Address, George Washington, the first President of the United States, warned the American public against the egotistic political factions. Both Madison and Washington believed that factions were signs of corruption. Despite the public warnings against factions, two political parties emerged from our founding fathers: the Federalists, and the Democratic-Republicans.

Read More

Studied Criticisms Of James Madison's Federalist 10

343 Words | 2 Pages

James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.

Read More

Ratification Dbq Essay

1265 Words | 6 Pages

Prior to the ratification of the United States Constitution, a series of eighty-five essays, later compiled and published as The Federalist Papers, were written under the joint pseudonym “Publius” by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. In these essays, the three men expressed support for ratification by explaining the meaning and virtues of the Constitution (Brinkley, 139). Although, it did not receive such fame until the early twentieth-century, Madison’s Federalist No. 10 has since been regarded as one of the more prominent Federalist papers (Adair, 48). In it, Madison presents the argument that the new republican government under the Constitution would be better able to deal with the problems that arise from factions. This paper

Read More

Slavery In Joseph J. Ellis's Founding Brothers

946 Words | 4 Pages

After a fiercely fought revolution, the newly independent American nation struggled to establish a concrete government amidst an influx of opposing ideologies. Loosely tied together by the Articles of Confederation, the thirteen sovereign states were far from united. As growing schisms in American society became apparent, an array of esteemed, prominent American men united in 1787 to form the basis of the United States government: the Constitution. Among the most eminent members of this convention were Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson. These men, held to an almost godly stature, defined the future of the nation; but were their intentions as honest as they seemed?

Read More

Process Involved In Crafting The Constitutional Convention Of 1787

605 Words | 3 Pages

This was the blueprint for governance that would profoundly shape the future of a nation. This paper will argue that the crafters of the Constitution of 1787 needed to contend with multiple complicated issues. The challenge of creating a federal system that balances the power between the national and state governments consists of. The crafters of the 1787 Constitution were faced with a mass of complex issues, ranging

Read More

How The Articles Of Confederation Hindered The Central Government

843 Words | 4 Pages

To combat this issue, and the others within the Articles, the Constitution was drafted to provide a layout for the country with a stronger government without invading the liberty of the people. The government under the Articles were subjected to the will majority in any conflict and Madison claimed that “there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual”. The liberties of the people and the authority of the government were drastically diminished when faced against a majority in a purely democratic country because of the full control that party gained to push their own agenda. James Madison’s argument on the Constitution’s ability to fight faction was, “Whilst all authority in it will be derived from and dependent on the society, the society itself will broken into so many parts… the minority, will be in little danger from interested combinations of the majority.” The government will still be able to possess authority over states and people, however, instead of just two contrasting parties where there has to be a majority, a republic forges multiple differentiating groups and ideas that makes factions less probable.

Read More

Ratification Of The Constitution Dbq Essay

1004 Words | 5 Pages

These principles would thwart any possibility of tyranny and ensure that no single branch could exercise complete control over the government (Carter, 2007). Despite this, many people still debated the amount of power the government should have over the nation. In a letter to Marquis Lafayette, George Washington argues that the amount of power the government has is just the right amount “to perform [the] functions of good government” (Document C) and that, said power would be so distributed across the three branches of government that it will never degenerate into an oppressive form of government. On the other hand, people like Elbridge Gerry believe the opposite. The anti-federalists feel as if the government will be too strong in general and as a result, be unable to provide an adequate representation and protection of the people’s rights.

Read More

How Did Huey Long Contribute To The Rise Of Populism

1525 Words | 7 Pages

The United States Constitution was drafted at a time of social upheaval and strong desire to create a well-protected republic that promoted democracy, civil liberties, and economic stability. The framers of the Constitution took advantage of this political atmosphere by creating a framework of government that outlined the American political institutions and channeled core American principles. The Constitution was intended to subsist against time and to design a government that could withstand trials. The rise of political figures like Huey Long, a populist demagogue, exposed the weakness of the constitution from shielding the accumulation of political power from a sole political authority. The framers of the Constitution did not foresee American

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The United States Constitution

427 Words | 2 Pages

The United States is a highly legalized country. The concept of the Constitution was deeply rooted into the country's life. It can be said that the origin of the United States Constitution is the gun dispute as the core. According to the Second Amendments of the US Constitution, people have the right to keep and possess arms. The purpose is to ensure that the state power is not violated, and it is a restriction for Federation.

Read More

Examples Of Thomas Jefferson's Efficacy Of The Constitution

1498 Words | 6 Pages

Although the Constitution is recognized as the fundamental framework for the American government, there have been many Americans who have been skeptical about its efficacy. One prime example of this skepticism is reflected in Thomas Jefferson’s proposal of rewriting the Constitution every nineteen years. According to Jefferson, every new generation of leaders should have the ability to construct a constitution more compatible to their generation. Essentially, Jefferson viewed the Constitution as temporary and incapable of adapting to the needs of future generations. Thomas Jefferson’s doubt of the prevalence of the Constitution can be paired to the skepticism that the anti-federalists shared when it was first proposed.

Read More

Republican Form Of Government In The Original Compromise By David Robertson

474 Words | 2 Pages

In a pure democracy, the power lies in the people as well, but is exercised directly by the citizens rather than by their elected representatives. After breaking free from British rule, America’s founders sought to stray away from government that did not value the voices of the people it governed. When working towards creating a new government, the founder’s beliefs were rooted in “republicanism,

Read More

Actions Taken By The Founding Fathers Essay

1135 Words | 5 Pages

After the American Revolution, the newly formed United States of America was substantially unstable as there was increasing economic and social unrest. The first written documents of constitutional authority were generally weak and ineffective. As a result, there was unrest among the colonists, and this created the urge for a newly reformed government system. The proclaimed Founding Fathers took action and put forward what they thought would be the best remedy to the new nation. Some call the Founding Fathers “democratic reformers”, however, this opinion is overall misguided and uninformed, as the Constitution and the actions taken by the Founding Fathers did not represent the majority of the people in the new nation.

Read More

Strong Vs Weak Central Government Essay

485 Words | 2 Pages

The debate for a strong versus weak central government was a prevalent issue in 1787 only years after becoming an independent country. Young America was struggling how to best rule the country while representing the people. With past disastrous events with the English tyranny and the more current issues with the articles of confederation, our country’s ruling became a heavily debated topic. The main fear of the anti-federalists was that the national government would have too much control preventing the people from expressing their rights. The federalists saw the faults in the Articles of Confederation and knew there had to be more of a national control.

Read More

What Is The Argument For The Anti-Federalists?

603 Words | 3 Pages

Reflecting upon “the complaints of farmers … the complaints of every class public creditors” and the “melancholy faces of … working people” the Federalists knew that they needed change, and that change should come in the form of a strong national government (Frazier 61). The Federalists, in order to combat the Anti-Federalists’ fears about the national government having too much power that could result in tyranny, proposed the idea of checks and balances. Thomas Jefferson, a man with the grand vision of liberty on his mind, supported the “organization of the government into Legislative, Judiciary and Executive” branches, because with the ability of each branch to restrict the other, the possibility of tyranny and a corrupt national government was drastically reduced (Jefferson

Read More

Madison And The Tyranny Of The Majority

774 Words | 4 Pages

James Madison, one of the founding fathers of America, was revolutionary in his ideas regarding American government and policies. James Madison, along with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, wrote arguably the most crucial evaluations of the future of American government and the logic of the newly improved US Constitution compared to the Articles of Confederation. Within Federalist Paper No.10, Madison mentions a groundbreaking idea of the “tyranny of the majority.” This idea, “tyranny of the majority,” examines the power that a majority can hold within a true democracy. Furthermore, this “tyranny of the majority” idea looks into the creation of “factions,” which Madison describes as a group of citizens with shared interests or beliefs that are contrary to the rights and interests of others or to the overall well-being of a community.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document