ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Enforcement System

777 Words4 Pages

What can the European Commission do when the enforcement system of your NCA is not effective and dissuasive? For example when infringements are not investigated, not sanctioned or the fines are very low and therefore don't have a deterrent effect.
Criminal sanctions hold a great potential as a efficient deterrent in the struggle against cartels . Sanctions create a risk that companies cannot compensate by participating in cartel monopolies . However, even though the Government of United Kingdom introduced a cartel offence to strengthen deterrence of the cartel prohibition of Article 101 and 102 TFEU and spread awareness of immorality of cartels , the enforcement system is still not effective and dissuasive. United Kingdom has failed to criminalise …show more content…

The risk of criminal sanction is outweighed by the profits of cartel involvement as proved by the London Interbank Offered Rate manipulation of the international depositories , and energy providers in the United Kingdom scheme . The failure stemmed from mistakes of prosecutors, unfortunate drafting and neglection of emphasising the moral wrongfulness of the cartels. If moral wrongfulness would have been emphasised, it would have resulted in people not wanting to break a moral norm, and the fear of social condemnation for infringing a moral norm , and the awareness of the risk of detection and prosecution . Despite the recent amendments that removed a problematic element of dishonesty , cartel enforcement is still lacking due to effortlessness with which the new defences are able to be met . The …show more content…

Moreover, the time limit also follows principle of effectiveness as it is reasonable to complain about an act in the period of 3 months. However, to satisfy the principle of effective judicial protection, a Member State has to have an effective access to a court, the court must meet institutional and procedural guarantees laid down in the Charter such as independence, impartiality, fair trial and reasonable time . Furthermore, the court has to have remedies at disposal that are effective to enforce European Law and restore a breach of that law . The judicial review in the United Kingdom does not fulfil the principle of effective judicial protection as individuals are not able to enforce all rights conferred on them by European Law before national courts and that application of European Law is not scrutinized by the competent court. Laws passed by Parliament are not eligible for judicial review in the United Kingdom, except in cases of the primary legislation being in conflict with European law or the European Convention on Human Rights. Therefore, judicial review in the United Kingdom is limited to the decisions of officials and public bodies, secondary legislation and prerogative orders. The number of courts in the United Kingdom that are entrusted with judicial review is not sufficient as, a

Show More
Related
599 Words | 3 Pages

What sets the judicial branch apart from the others is the inability to execute the laws and carry out their own decisions made in the high court. Just as it is the executives place to enforce the laws and the legislation to construct laws, it is the responsibility of the courts to determine if the Constitution has been

Read More
1207 Words | 5 Pages

The judicial branch has paved its way to gain resilience amongst the three branches. It has gain more power over the years, and usually has the final “say so,” in parliament

Read More
355 Words | 2 Pages

Bylaws are public regulatory laws that apply to a specific area. The principal disparity between a bylaw and a law enacted by a national or regional body is that the bylaw is created by a non-sovereign body that obtains its authority from a different governing body and can only be created on a restricted selection of matters. A municipal government or a local committee gets its authority to enact laws via a law of the national or regional government that details which things the town or city may manage through bylaws. Therefore, it’s a kind of designated legislation.

Read More
1867 Words | 8 Pages

In this essay I will argue that the public are mislead by the media to believe that English judges impose artificial and undesirable limits on their own power to change the law. I will explain how the reformation of this law is primarily down to Parliament as they, as a democratically elected body, can ensure that the whole nation’s view on this sensitive topic is reflected in new legislation. The Current Law on Assisted Suicide

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

It is legally invalid for Parliament to bind its successors; thus every Parliament has unlimited freedom to pass any legislations on any subject matter. Overall, Parliament sovereignty is fundamental in the British constitution. According to the conclusion drawn by the A.W. Bradley, on the account of the topic of Parliamentary sovereignty, it is possible, for Parliament to repeal the requirements of the ECA, thus removing itself European Communities Act 1972 . This is accurate to an extent, it differs from scholars and academics pre- 1991, they argued Parliamentary statutes are legally binding. Nevertheless, there are controls to laws Parliament chooses to enact, first it must remove

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

Police have faced armed white people that were threatening to shoot and the worst punishment they were given was arrest. While the criminals were yelling threats towards them, the police were trying to calm them down and get them to put down their weapons for even up to an hour long. There has been similar moments with non white people that were unarmed and causing no harm but still the police chose to shoot the offender for the slightest threat. The police need to keep everyone secure no matter what without considering a person 's ethnicity. Police are supposed to be heroes, grant us safety, and end the day with justice.

Read More
748 Words | 3 Pages

Our criminal justice system should have more safeguard’s to prevent innocent people from wrongful death sentencing. People should be against death sentencing because there are lots of reasons innocent people get the death sentencing. How will having more safeguards to help prevent innocent people from the death sentence. , How can we better our criminal justice system? The advantages of our criminal justice system., and The disadvantages of our criminal justice system.

Read More
289 Words | 2 Pages

This act makes most of the rights in the European Convention on Human Rights directly enforceable in the English courts. It requires signatory states to uphold a number of fundamental civil rights, including freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9) and freedom of expression (article 10). Section 6 of the HRA 1998 requires public authorities to act compatibly with the Convention. So what is the impact on statute law or common

Read More
207 Words | 1 Pages

In conclusion, there is proof to support both sides of the argument that can be backed statistically and with other evidence. Some may choose sides and say that jobs are killed completely as more and more regulations are put forth by the government and be completely against them or others may believe that government regulations are a good thing and that they may cause some jobs to be lost but that in the long run, regulations are best for the good of the world around them. In my opinion, after researching both sides, I feel that government regulations are not as big of threat to jobs as some may think. Often times it seems that other reasons for jobs being killed are blamed on the government regulations when it is more than likely a result

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction The term prostitution often brings up a lot of feelings in conversation. We get this image in our heads about the young heroin addict walking the streets at nighttime, which is an outdated description that does more harm than good. Not only does a large portion of sex work take place online but prostitutes vary greatly in gender, age and social status, according to a study conducted at the University of Birmingham for the article Debates around sex industry based on 'sexist stereotypes '. Enforcing laws to restrict these sort of exchanges is commonly accepted as a good way to protect people from the industry but in what way does criminalization actually help?

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

In England, the famous case is the Burma Oil Company Ltd v Lord Advocate . In this case, by an act of the Parliament, the War Damage Act 1965, Parliament ousted by a retrospective Act, a judgment awarded by the court, awarding damages to Burma Oil Company Ltd for damage that was done by the British forces towards their property during the Second World War. This was for public policy reasons i.e. the consequence of the judgment was opening the doors to numerous claims against the British government from all over the world where the British was a colonial power, consequence of which was financial ruin for the British government. In Malaysia, the Societies Act 1966 was amended to remove the jurisdiction of the courts to adjudicate in political disputes within a political party or disputes between members of a society . In this sense, the rule of law does not

Read More
1521 Words | 7 Pages

Therefore, the question arises of whether or not the United Kingdom should pursue constitutional reform in the form of codifying our existing

Read More
1268 Words | 6 Pages

[5] Common law works in a different way, the judges rather than the Parliament make common law or ‘judge-made law’. Considering criminal and civil cases, the judges take decisions based on the stare decisis principle (Latin “to stand by things decided”, the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent [4]), deliver rulings and create precedents, thus applying the law to real life situations. Therefore, the value of the precedent is very high in the English Common Law system. The strengths of common law

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

In contrast, the first point of interest is the existence of a formal constitution. The United Kingdom does not operate under a written constitution. The main mechanism applicable is the law of precedence whereby laws are enforced based on similar cases that happened in the past. On the other hand, the United States has a written constitution. All laws are crafted by the legislative bodies and passed through a

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

The use of ECHR or European Convention on Human Rights in British courts before it was being incorporated into United Kingdom law is an example. UK and any other country which relies to the power of legislation, should always if possible do not conflicts with the international law. Therefore the supremacy of both laws depends on the acceptance if the municipal courts to the international law

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Enforcement System

Related Topics

Open Document