ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Monroe Doctrine

1366 Words6 Pages

In the past the United States is known for its notorious habit to take other people’s land. A particular case is Cuba. Cuba was apart of Spain but the United states wanted to capture Cuba and help them gain independence. The action that took place with Panama after a long war and a struggling government the United states also lended a hand to Panama and tried to build the canal. Lending a hand isn’t a problem but when you are trying to take over the country it then becomes a problem. Another action the U.S attempted to take over Panama was to justify it with the Monroe Doctrine. The Monroe Doctrine was a United States policy that was meant to oppose european colonialism and that the U.S would handle the western hemisphere affairs. Despite the …show more content…

In document “”Autopsy of the Monroe Doctrine” by Gaston Nerval talks about a different point of view during this time. Most documents up until now talked about the U.S’s documents and point of view. But this document comes from a point of view from a bolivian journalist and diplomat. In the first sentence it already says the United States policy has a powerful influence on the Latin American policy. “Monroe Doctrine justifies all the aggressive policies of the past. In the eyes of Latin America, it is a pretext for them”(88). The Monroe Doctrine imposes self rights and is easily manipulated to help the United States. The Abandonment of the Monroe Doctrine was a document meant to discard points that might have the U.S misunderstood. The first point in the abandonment of the Monroe Doctrine is that “The Monroe Doctrine was not intended for the benefit of Latin America”(89). This brings up the question about whether or not the Monroe Doctrine supported to claim to the Panama Canal. Another point that is brought up in the abandonment of the Monroe Doctrine is the seventh point “ The Monroe Doctrine has been distorted to serve as an instrument of the hegemony of the United States in the Western Hemisphere”(89). This means that Latin America doesn’t have any rights or benefits from the Monroe Doctrine. The U.S had power and right to establish the

Show More
Related
79 Words | 1 Pages

At first the Latin American nations saw this as favorable, because they saw that the U.S. could not do anything alone if moving along without the backing of Britain. The military and political power allowed the Monroe Doctrine to be brought about. This doctrine had combined with much of the ideas of Manifest Destiny. Theodore Roosevelt’s Corollary was a great extension of this doctrine, it upturned the original meaning and justified independent intervention of the U.S. in Latin America.

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

Nostra heard about the Monroe Doctrine and had some idea to change it up. Ithad no more of it to be used solely for economic dominance and imperialism by the United States, but in conjunction with its twenty neighbors, to defend the collective security of the Western Hemisphere. But changing the Monroe Doctrine only changed some of its power. Still, the Monroe Doctrine could still have advance American economic and political interests in the Western

Read More
165 Words | 1 Pages

The Monroe Doctrine was an expression of nationalism as it declared the United States’s intention to stay out of European affairs and it forced Europe to not interfere in the Americas. Firstly, the United States declared it would stay out of European affairs, wars, and conflicts, signaling an inward focus. However, the United States also threatened Europe when it declared it would go to war in case any European nation attempted further colonization or interference in the Western hemisphere. Metaphorically speaking, the US built a wall between the Americas and Europe, impeding any military or political interference. Even though the US did not have the power to enforce this at the time, it was carving its path to dominate nations in Latin America

Read More
105 Words | 1 Pages

His most famous piece of legislature, the Monroe Doctrine, came at a time when Eurasia was in a state of turmoil. In 1821, the Russian Tzar, Alexander I, declared that any territory above the 51st parallel would belong solely to Russia. This was an enormous threat for the sovereignty of the young United States since Russia colonized and governed Alaska since 1784 and had begun expanding southward toward the Oregon territory. Moreover, the Tzar banned any foreign ships from coming closer than 115 miles off the coast of the “Russian America”. and claimed a monopoly on fur hunting, fishing, and all trading in that region.

Read More
488 Words | 2 Pages

During the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century United States main goal was to imperialize other territories. After the Spanish- American War, the United States became an imperialist power by annexing the Philippines, Puerto Rico, Hawaii and Samoa. Americans also developed overseas trade with China and Japan. The United States proposition was to expand their region because they wanted to influence other nations for new trading locations, more resources and the increase of military protection. In spite of the fact that they had the same proposition, their political and economical motives were departed.

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

The United States promised to stay out of European business and told the Europeans to stay out its as well. European countries that interfere in America taken as acts of aggression. The Monroe Doctrine was propounded by President James Monroe in 1823. Monroe proposed that the US would oppose further colonization of North and South America by European powers but would not interfere in the affairs of existing

Read More
208 Words | 1 Pages

The Monroe Doctrine was a threat to European nations for multiple reasons. To begin with, the Monroe Doctrine was a document that was written by John Quincy Adams. The states that were affected by the Monroe Doctrine are the European countries and the independent, smaller countries such as Mexico. The main thesis of the Monroe Doctrine is that America has forbidden Europe from invading other individual countries. The doctrine is a threat because it states that foreign countries are forbidden to enter and colonize land in the western hemisphere.

Read More
711 Words | 3 Pages

Monroe achieved in preserving and furthering the liberty Americans strived for, as well as expanding the size of the U.S. By signing the Florida Purchase Treaty, Monroe managed to gain Spanish Florida as well as setting a larger border by signing the Treaty of 1818. In addition to broadening America’s border’s, James’s legendary Monroe Doctrine boosted America’s freedom and stature to a great extent. The Monroe Doctrine made a great change to America’s foreign policy - it declared an end to European nations colonizing or interfering with states in North or South

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

The Spanish American War was a big step towards American War power and influenced foreign countries greatly with trade, naval power, and territory. The Era of the Spanish - American contributed to the advancement in trade for the United States. After the Hay-Pauncefote treaty with Britain was abolished, the U.S. was free to build a canal in Latin America with their help. The canal was set to be built in Panama, this canal was to benefit America to create ports free from tax in this country. This was granted when the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty of 1903 gave rights over a 51 mile long and 10 mile wide Canal Zone to protect the U.S. With these rights American manufacturing exporting companies without any tariffs for the citizens of the States.

Read More
634 Words | 3 Pages

Should The U.S. Have Annexed The Philippines? When the Spanish-American war came to an end and Spain gave up their power in the Philippines and Cuba, the US showed they had no interest in annexing Cuba but were debating on whether or not they should annex the Philippines. The possibility of annexation pleased some but it also made other unhappy, like Emilio Aguinaldo who wanted the Philippines to be free from colonization.

Read More
1199 Words | 5 Pages

The US did not not have solid reasons to do so besides their own greed, so the US hid behind the idea of Manifest Destiny and tried to justify their actions. John O’Sullivan was the New York City journalist who coined the term Manifest Destiny. He said, “Imbecile and distracted, Mexico never can exert any real government authority over such a country…’’ (O’Sullivan, 8). O’Sullivan and the US suggested that Mexico “needed” the US to come and take over, because otherwise Mexico was going to fall apart. Although this was somewhat true, the US did not try to help Mexico through this difficult time; instead, the US took advantage of Mexico’s weakness and tried to take over completely.

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

His three major ones were the Monroe Doctrine and his acquisition of Florida from Spain. With the Monroe Doctrine, James Monroe established that no European power would be allowed to interfere in the western hemisphere and any attempts to do so would be seen as a threat. This Doctrine established the U.S. foreign policy for many years and defined American interests in the world. With Britain backing Monroe with his policy, no European nation dared to enter that area. Monroe also established neutrality with Latin America.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

This policy had a lot of influences and affects. The Monroe Doctrine had a lot of positive effects on the United States and Britain. It basically helped shape America as it is today. The Monroe doctrine states "In the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with our policy to do so.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

The Monroe Doctrine was a speech given in 1823 by James Monroe, the 5th president of the United States, to the U.S. Congress concerning European presence in the Western Hemisphere. Monroe was becoming continuously concerned about European influence in the region. While the primary audience for this message was Congress, the intended audience was all European powers, including Russia, and Latin America. The events in Latin America before and after the Spanish-American War will be used as an example of the imperial reach by the U.S. The United States, ironically, became an imperial power through its mission outlined in the Monroe Doctrine to end European colonialism and imperialism.

Read More
1223 Words | 5 Pages

In the next two hundred years, the United States would break away from being a British colony, and instead begin to expand to other areas. America’s belief in expansion was further developed by the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, which declared America to be the protector of the west. Furthermore, the Manifest Destiny in the 1840s demonstrated that the call towards expansion was a crucial part of the national identity; it was instilled into the people that God had blessed them

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Monroe Doctrine

Related Topics

Open Document