ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Second Amendment

1853 Words8 Pages

The Second Amendment forms part of the 10 ratified amendments of the constitution which form the Bill of Rights and was enabled by the United States Congress in December 1791. The amendment states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” . These twenty-seven words have been the focus of much debate and lobbying not just within the three branches of government but across the whole of the United States. It is the most controversial topic regarding the American Constitution and has become an emotive subject with two very distinct camps of thought. The one side of the debate, the loud minority, arguing for and protecting their constitutional …show more content…

Statistics show that comparable to other democratic nations the United states has a higher proportion of gun related violent incidents than those states where gun control legislation has been adopted. An example would be the case of the United Kingdom, which had approximately 2,261 Violence Against the Person (VAP) Offences involving firearms, including low velocity Air weapons in 2015/16 . If this is then compared to the United States which had, in the same period, 9,616 gun related murders and a million VAP offences that did not end in a fatality, then it can be argued that the NRA’s outdated mantra is illogical . There are many further problems with the NRA argument that can be identified in the modern era., but the main issue would be the NRA’s reasons for the existence of the Amendment. The idea that the Founders wanted to put the citizens on an equal footing as the Government to provide a defence against oppression is also no longer a valid interpretation of the Second Amendment. The United States Federal Government has a vast arsenal of weapons at its disposal including Nuclear weapons, advocates of the Second Amendment would have to advocate for these weapons to be made available to all citizens. It is clear that the second Amendment does not have the same meaning as it did when it was ratified. The founding fathers did not consider the advancements of technology that exist today, or never considered the Amendment as an individual right but rather a group right for a recognised, well-regulated militia. The NRA has lobbied effectively to prevent the control and appropriate regulation of firearms in the United States of America and has taken ownership of the Second Amendment as a Battle cry against Federal Government. In doing so it has removed the rights of all those killed by uncontrolled firearms, it has taken away the rights of a

Show More
Related
591 Words | 3 Pages

The Second amendment is one that allows all americans to carry guns. Because of the school shootings and other massacres people are saying that they want to have gun restrictions. The way that they are wanting to just act like everything will be ok when they ban guns is almost a denile. Even if they make guns completely illegal people who have the desire to kill someone will still be able to do so if they wish. The gun bans are only occurring in the states not across the

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

Why 2nd Amendment Is So Popular Background Information The second amendment is probably the most controversial amendment in the Bill of Rights. The second amendment is stated in the Bill of Rights as, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"(“Second Amendment”) This could mean that you have the right to possess a small gun for self-defence purposes only, but the real meaning is a very controversial argument. Focusing on this amendment is important because it is a very disputed amendment still debated today.

Read More
668 Words | 3 Pages

On December 15, 1791, a well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms. The bill was approved by three-fourths of the United States. The 2nd Amendment was created, to provide citizens of the U.S. a form of private protection. However due to the increase of technology along with the rise of violence in modern time, many are beginning to question if we should remove the Amendment, and only grant members within militia organizations access to this Amendments right to bear weapons.

Read More
1982 Words | 8 Pages

The Bill of Rights was passed by congress on September 25, 1789 and was ratified on December 15 , 1791. James Madison and George Manson contributed to the bill rights. In the website, “Bill of Rights Institute,” the “Bill of Rights of The United States of America (1791)” explains the history of the Bill of Rights. At first 17 amendments were agreed on at the house but only 12 out of those 17 were approved. From there , only 10 were passed after being sent to the rest of the states.

Read More
1714 Words | 7 Pages

The second amendment states that well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. This amendment has brought upon debates for control. For many the gun symbolizes crimes, sexual frustration, aggression, violence, and all that is wrong in American culture. For others it symbolizes, manliness, independence, outdoorsmanship, and willingness to die for one's believe (La valle). The debate over Gun Control has peaked in recent years due to societies opposing conflict and a lack of compromise.

Read More
1203 Words | 5 Pages

The first amendment guarantees five basic freedoms to the American citizens. These freedoms are of speech, press, petition, assembly and religion. As all the amendments, the first amendment is intended for use in situations with the government. The first amendment was written by James Madison and was sent to the states to be ratified on September 25, 1789 along with the twelve proposals for the bill of rights.. Then it was officially adopted on December 15, 1791.

Read More
1912 Words | 8 Pages

The Second Amendment, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." –James Madison, The Second Amendment. The founders of our country as well as our constitution believed that without weapons in the form of firearms, there is no freedom from the harsh rulings of a corrupt government. These founders had just been freed from the duty of war from a corrupt and harsh government, without their weapons or the weapons of the people; this country would not be where it is today.

Read More
74 Words | 1 Pages

In conclusion, I believe the Second Amendment is partly suitable for modern society in the United States considering the militia to provide security. However, in my opinion there 's a great issue with gun control in America and something needs to be changed. The deaths of minors and adults have become too numerous to excuse it as exceptions. Something has to happen and this part of the second Amendment goes the wrong way with that.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

This source talks about the beginning and evolution of the second amendment. It talks about its original intentions, then goes on to explain how it is being interpreted today. The biggest debate is whether the amendment is the private right of citizens to bear arms, or a right that can be exercised only through militia organizations. The purpose of this amendment was so that there would not have to be a need of a large military since it was believed that this would suppress the people. If there was a small invasion then the militia could handle it.

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

And since the Constitution establish this as a right, the government have to ensure that citizens have access to arms powerful enough to defend themselves against a potential government tyranny. So, if I cannot afford a tank, the government has to buy one for me. Thus, the Second Amendment is not a valid argument as Hamilton and Jefferson did not foresee a time when governments would have weapons powerful enough to eliminate the human species. Bearing arms was also a collective right for militias, not an individual one for

Read More
95 Words | 1 Pages

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the individual to keep and bear firearms. When the Second Amendment was written it was for the right to arm oneself as a personal liberty to deter undemocratic or oppressive governing bodies from forming and to repel impending invasions. Furthermore, gun advocates proclaim that guns are for the right to self-defense. Some people try to participate and uphold the law. We have seen how guns in the hands of children can cause fatal accidents and people have committed mindless crimes leading to

Read More
285 Words | 2 Pages

The second amendment states that people have a right to bear arms under a well-regulated militia. This amendment was added to the Bill of Rights because the Americans had just finished fighting The American Revolution with the British government for independence-- Gun control by the British was one of the catalysts of this war. With the revolution fresh in mind, the Americans had registered that there was a need to unite and form a union; however, some Americans felt that a union could result in something similar to the tyranny that the British had imposed on them. They were hesitant of placing the power on a small handful of people-- The second amendment helped take some power from the government and give it to the people.

Read More
1649 Words | 7 Pages

The Second Amendment was never actually intended for everyday citizens. In the writing of the amendment it states militia meaning that it was only intended for them to bear arms. Citizens have found easy access to the weapons that they use in their shootings. Therefore, guns are put into the wrong hands, which means gun regulations should be stricter and allow a more detailed background check with mental health evaluations. There have been gun purchases where there has been a flaw in the background check system, allowing mentally ill or irresponsible people to obtain guns.

Read More
352 Words | 2 Pages

The Second Amendment had made a big impact in the U.S. The Second Amendment stated “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the to security of a free state , the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Many citizens do not support the second amendment or as known as Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists is anyone who doesn’t support anything in the constitution. But it needs to be supported by the citizens to keep yourself safe.

Read More
1297 Words | 6 Pages

In contrast, Opponents believe that arms should have regulations because they cause violence, such as mass shootings and murder. Despite the differences on each side, the second amendment aids in the protection of all individual rights of the people to keep and bear arms for self-defense when necessary. As a result, the definition of the right to bear arms has to be provided. The second amendment is quite a chicanery clause to understand, the first part of the clause states “ a well-regulated militia.” “Well regulated…” was defined in the eighteenth century, as properly but not overly regulated (Roleff 69).

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Second Amendment

Open Document