ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Second Amendment

1714 Words7 Pages

The second amendment states that well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. This amendment has brought upon debates for control. For many the gun symbolizes crimes, sexual frustration, aggression, violence, and all that is wrong in American culture. For others it symbolizes, manliness, independence, outdoorsmanship, and willingness to die for one's believe (La valle). The debate over Gun Control has peaked in recent years due to societies opposing conflict and a lack of compromise. Mass shootings in cities like Aurora, Sandy Hook, Parkland, Las Vegas and more have stimulated the social and political conversation. Rights, regulations, implementation of new …show more content…

Social change is brought upon as well, with the pressure in choosing a side and speaking up. The second amendment, originally ratified in 1791 for militia use only, then later became the right of the citizens to bear arms in defense. The national firearms act of 1934 imposes taxes on manufacturing, importing, and dealing with firearms. Providing a greater amount of economic stability towards weapons. The firearms protection act revised provisions on the gun control act of 1968. Part of this revision is to prevent the government from keeping records of firearm sale owners, favoring supporters of Gun rights. The pattern during the period of these implication is the legislations resistance to face the conflict of gun regulation (vizzard). Throughout the years, organizations have been formed in favor of a specific group or interest to fund politicians in order for their support throughout the campaigning. These Political Action Committees have strengthen politicians to turn away from the restrictions of

Show More
Related
277 Words | 2 Pages

I don't necessarily agree nor disagree with the author. America has basically been doomed from the start. When the 2nd amendment was created James Madison probably didn't think that 100s of year later citizens would use it for as an excuse for mass murders across the country. The amendment will not be nullified anytime in the near future because most states wouldn't support this decision. Most citizens own a gun either legally or illegally for protection.

Read More
523 Words | 3 Pages

The thought process behind this is that it will help prevent shootings and keep criminals and mentally ill people from getting guns. Other people want to maintain this right and not be limited. They think that having guns will allow them to protect themselves from criminals and the rise of a tyrannical government. The Second Amendment was adopted into the United States Constitution on December 15, 1791, along with the other amendments in the Bill of

Read More
1827 Words | 8 Pages

Schnayerson Steel Prof, Weatherill ENG 102 6 March 2023 1984 and Constitutional Rights The second amendment provides Americans with the right keep and bear arms and form a well-regulated militia. Forming a militia could provide the proles and Winson with a place to stay safe to an extent since this could also put them in danger, this is how it reads in the constitution, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state. ” The right to keep and bear arms is to have a gun and to be allowed to carry it, this is how it reads in the constitution, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The second amendment of the United States Bill of Rights is the most beneficial amendment to the people

Read More
193 Words | 1 Pages

In recent events, two opposing sides have risen to debate whether the Second Amendment, which gives the right to a U.S. citizen to own a firearm, should be kept intact or removed from the Constitution completely. The feud described in Romeo and Juliet compares to this argument because although they are fairly different both sides of each argument rae supported by motivation from each parties Romeo and Juliet’s motivation was their love for eachother. The US citizens believed guns are needed to protection of intruders. After the recent and tragic school shooting taken place in Parkland, Florida the people of the United States are crying for change that will keep the students of this country safe. However, the opposing side argues that the

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

The Second Amendment (in the constitution) is one that can bring up hours and hours of debate, maybe the most of them all. These debates, unfortunately, will never come to an end because there will be know agreeance in what would be done. In my opinion, what is trying to be done right now is not going to work, the politicians in office right now want to stop the weapons and not the perpetrators. Every time there is a mass shooting/bombing the idea of gun control comes up and it is not going to get us as a nation anywhere because that is not the issue. We know who is doing these mass murders such as the Boston bombings, Paris attacks, San Bernadino shooting, and Brussels attack that happen just this morning, stricter gun laws would not have

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

When the U. S. Supreme Court issued its seminal rulings in Heller (2008) and McDonald (2010), finding that the Second Amendment does in fact guarantee an individual right to keep and bear arms that must be recognized by the states, many Americans felt like the issue of the Second Amendment had finally been settled in America. Unfortunately, as we would quickly see in Chicago, Washington, D.C., and elsewhere -- it was only the latest chapter in what has become an endless battle for the natural right of self-defense. Take, for instance, the District of Columbia’s post-Heller “fix” to its unconstitutional gun laws -- forcing citizens to obtain a license to carry firearms outside their home, but failing to provide any mechanism by which to obtain a license. In other jurisdictions, including Illinois and Seattle, officials attempted to create de facto gun bans by increasing the cost of ownership through taxes and fees, regardless of the impact on minority citizens.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Though these many mass shootings seem to occur more frequently than ever, the argument over Second Amendment rights appears to limit much action regarding gun control. The Second Amendment will likely remain a powerful topic in our modern world for generations to

Read More
1207 Words | 5 Pages

his essay mainly focuses on the multiple perspectives given towards the Second Amendment. These perspectives are given from Saul Cornell and Joyce. They both analyze and examine on what the Second Amendment really means. They discuss about the rights that the amendment gives to citizens that live in United States, which is the right to own firearms. Also, They give some examples on how these deadly firearms are sometimes used for the wrong reasons.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights is the right to bear arms, which gives American citizens a constitutional right to own and purchase guns. It states, "A well-regulated

Read More
411 Words | 2 Pages

The gun laws and restrictions help and saw many of lives. Controversy started when the 2nd amendment was started in December 15, 1791. The controversy was from some of the military and police. The government thought that it stated that people had the right to defend themselves but only against the police or military. One of

Read More
95 Words | 1 Pages

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the individual to keep and bear firearms. When the Second Amendment was written it was for the right to arm oneself as a personal liberty to deter undemocratic or oppressive governing bodies from forming and to repel impending invasions. Furthermore, gun advocates proclaim that guns are for the right to self-defense. Some people try to participate and uphold the law. We have seen how guns in the hands of children can cause fatal accidents and people have committed mindless crimes leading to

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

The topic of gun control and firearm regulation has been subject to heated debate for a long while. Both sides have potent arguments, however the core of this issue ultimately boils down to the constitution itself. More specifically the second amendment. This argument quickly becomes quite complicated because gun control and firearm regulation concerns not only the right of citizens, but more importantly the safety of citizens. The second amendment helps to guarantee an imperative right belonging to all citizens.

Read More
1297 Words | 6 Pages

In contrast, Opponents believe that arms should have regulations because they cause violence, such as mass shootings and murder. Despite the differences on each side, the second amendment aids in the protection of all individual rights of the people to keep and bear arms for self-defense when necessary. As a result, the definition of the right to bear arms has to be provided. The second amendment is quite a chicanery clause to understand, the first part of the clause states “ a well-regulated militia.” “Well regulated…” was defined in the eighteenth century, as properly but not overly regulated (Roleff 69).

Read More
1290 Words | 6 Pages

The 2nd Amendment gives the people the right to bear arms. It allows people to have guns. The current problem is that it too easy to obtain a gun and that people want another way to obtain it. There has been an increase in crime because of how easy it is to obtain firearms or any type of weapon to cause which could be a danger to people. The lack of gun control is a big problem in the United States of America because of crimes that have been committed in these past years.

Read More
1991 Words | 8 Pages

The Second Amendment says, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Gun rights has become the subject of intense political, social, and cultural battles for much of the last century. The pro-gun right side has asserted that the right to arms was absolute, and that any gun control laws infringed that right (Kopel, 2013). This right has been supported by the Supreme Court who has reinforced what has become the American consensus that the Second Amendment allows the right to keep and bear arms, especially for self-defense, and that it is a fundamental individual

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Second Amendment

Related Topics

Open Document