Executive summary unit lll The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution is a part of the United States Bill of Rights that prohibits the federal government from imposing excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishments. This amendment was added to the Constitution as a result of the abuses suffered by American colonists under British rule, where the government had the power to impose cruel and unusual punishments. The Eighth Amendment was added to the Constitution in 1791, along with nine other amendments known as the Bill of Rights. The amendment was necessary to protect the basic human rights of individuals in the criminal justice system and to prevent the government from imposing excessive and unjust punishments.
I don't necessarily agree nor disagree with the author. America has basically been doomed from the start. When the 2nd amendment was created James Madison probably didn't think that 100s of year later citizens would use it for as an excuse for mass murders across the country. The amendment will not be nullified anytime in the near future because most states wouldn't support this decision. Most citizens own a gun either legally or illegally for protection.
The first amendment protects our everyday life when it come to speaking, Writing, religion, signing a petition,or gathering together for a protest. Congress shall make no law respecting any of these topics. The scenario at hand explained how a group of students set the flag on fire and they all got arrested, the real question is however, are the police within their rights to do so? Overall, there are two sides to the subject, one is, the students are able to burn the flag and should not be punished at all, the other side is that burning the flag infringes upon our rights and it is not allowed. The students are able to burn the flag and they shall not be punished.
Schnayerson Steel Prof, Weatherill ENG 102 6 March 2023 1984 and Constitutional Rights The second amendment provides Americans with the right keep and bear arms and form a well-regulated militia. Forming a militia could provide the proles and Winson with a place to stay safe to an extent since this could also put them in danger, this is how it reads in the constitution, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state. ” The right to keep and bear arms is to have a gun and to be allowed to carry it, this is how it reads in the constitution, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The second amendment of the United States Bill of Rights is the most beneficial amendment to the people
For my final research project, I have elected to break down the main controversial points when inferring the Second Amendment. Honestly, I do not really have an exact reason why I zeroed inn on the Second Amendment. In this case, I suppose it was a good fit for me due to all the events taking place in our society today. Generally, I really wanted to cultivate the unique essence bound within the letters of the Second Amendment. For the most part, I believe I have succeeded in my quest by first scripting the tale of how the Constitution and the Bill of Rights arose in the new nation.
When the U. S. Supreme Court issued its seminal rulings in Heller (2008) and McDonald (2010), finding that the Second Amendment does in fact guarantee an individual right to keep and bear arms that must be recognized by the states, many Americans felt like the issue of the Second Amendment had finally been settled in America. Unfortunately, as we would quickly see in Chicago, Washington, D.C., and elsewhere -- it was only the latest chapter in what has become an endless battle for the natural right of self-defense. Take, for instance, the District of Columbia’s post-Heller “fix” to its unconstitutional gun laws -- forcing citizens to obtain a license to carry firearms outside their home, but failing to provide any mechanism by which to obtain a license. In other jurisdictions, including Illinois and Seattle, officials attempted to create de facto gun bans by increasing the cost of ownership through taxes and fees, regardless of the impact on minority citizens.
Guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the United States’ Constitution, as interpreted by our Courts, is a Citizen’s Right to Bear Arms. According to the National Rifle Association and many other proponents of the Second Amendment, this argument is incontrovertible and no longer up for debate, and in the current political climate, I concede this point; however, I am not here to discuss the merits of a Citizen’s Right to Bear Arms, but rather a similar and much more controversial topic: The Right to Arm Bears! As a representative of the newly formed Squirrel Lobby, we state categorically and for the record, this idea is completely nuts! Like a logical philosopher, or any lobbyist worth their extravagant lobbying fee, let’s start by defining terms. A gun is a tool, a technological device that exists to solve certain problems.
The constitutional amendment grants each individual who has been a victim of a crime has a right to see their defendant to be imprisoned for a period of longer than one year; the defendant might be imprisoned for more than one year. The individual can be a victim of any other crime such as violence; following rights: (Reword this look at this before https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-joint-resolution/64) • To the reasonable notice, not be excluded from, any public records or proceedings linking to crime, • Submit the statement of all public proceedings to find out the conditional release from the custody, acceptance of negotiated plea, non-public release on parole proceedings, these rights are given to convicted offender, • To equitable notice of, an opportunity to acquiesce the statement concerning, and a proposed pardon and commutation of the sentence, • To reasonable notification of escape or release from the custody relating to any crime, • To consideration of a victim that trial can be free from an
While having free speech can be a problem and anger many, it IS one of our basic freedoms. The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution as the first ten amendments on December 15, 1791 and the fact that American’s rights were not protected and added to the Constitution any earlier heated up numerous debates! The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, press, religion, and petition. It is very well one of America’s special aspects and for some American’s, it is their most cherished personal freedoms. With that being said, I do not see a problem with one having the ability to speak their own opinion, I just think their should be a few limitations.
The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. There are many ideas expressed in times where it would be inappropriate or unnecessary to use one’s freedom of speech. These circumstances would be where something is inappropriate or misidentified as hate speech. There are many situations where someone may want to say something, yet there are times where some things should not be said.
The Constitution guarantees American’s the right to carry arms. If the forefather’s had foreseen what was to become of this right, they might have made a few provisions to this law. Gun control supporters advocate that only police or armed services should have possession of weapons. Nevertheless, gun supporters point out the lack of available police officers to protect all the citizens. Supporters of gun control argue that weapons kill.
The First Amendment protects five of our basic rights as Americans; this is through the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The Frist Amendment grants Americans the freedom of religion, speech and press. In addition, the First Amendment allows Americans the right to peacefully assemble, but it prohibits petitioning a government redress of grievances. With these five freedoms, Americans are allowed to express themselves, with certain limitations, without having to fear punishment from the government. The Firs¬¬t Amendment is what set the foundation for the constitution of the United States of America and is the reason our government functions properly.
Chapter 6 Article 2: Congress vs. the States on Guns Chapter six of the textbook, Constitutional Law and the Criminal Justice System by J. Scott Harr, Karen M. Hess, Christine Orthmann, and Jonathon Kingsbury, goes into extensive detail on the seconded amendment of the United States Constitution. To briefly sum up, the seconded amendment states that “a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 167). Pursuing this further, there has been a considerable amount of debate throughout the years on what ‘the right to bear Arms’ really implies for American citizens today. Due to the confusion, many states have had to appear in
Kyree Cain Mrs. Haseltine English 10 17 May 2017 The 2nd amendment caused a lot of controversy in the land. It had made a lot of citizens upset because they tried to put restrictions on gun owning. It made them think that they was telling them what to do with their gun. There were a lot of restrictions when the 2nd amendment was made and it put pressure on gun owners. The 2nd amendment also made the crime rate decrease.
THE FIRST AMENDMENT Name Course Date THE FIRST AMENDMENT Introduction The first amendment was adopted back in December of 1791 primarily to relieve the opposition of constitutional ratification by the anti-federalists of the time. The first amendment states that "The Congress shall not make a law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the exercise thereof; or abridging freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. " Breaking the first amendment down, there is the freedom of religion, the freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly and also the right of the citizens to petition about a particular