The young nation, barely three years old, was dying. Ten years after the Declaration of Independence, America was struggling to hold itself together. The Articles of Confederation, designed during the Revolution, demolished even the inkling of monarchy by forcing the national government to abide by the whim of the states. During the Revolutionary War the states held together out of necessity, but after the war, the states became hostile to their neighbors. It quickly became evident that a serious crisis has settled upon the United States.
The colonies that currently compose the British claims in North America are forced to make a decision. We have been under the oppressive rule of Europe for too long. Our minor claims for self-rule and independence have seemingly been laughed at by our English counterparts, and without decisive action we will remain stagnant in our goals. Although there are flaws in the currently proposed constitution, we must accept what we have written and continue to work towards a more perfect union. The currently proposed constitution has come from months of progress and many meetings of The Constitutional Convention.
I don't necessarily agree nor disagree with the author. America has basically been doomed from the start. When the 2nd amendment was created James Madison probably didn't think that 100s of year later citizens would use it for as an excuse for mass murders across the country. The amendment will not be nullified anytime in the near future because most states wouldn't support this decision. Most citizens own a gun either legally or illegally for protection.
The first amendment protects our everyday life when it come to speaking, Writing, religion, signing a petition,or gathering together for a protest. Congress shall make no law respecting any of these topics. The scenario at hand explained how a group of students set the flag on fire and they all got arrested, the real question is however, are the police within their rights to do so? Overall, there are two sides to the subject, one is, the students are able to burn the flag and should not be punished at all, the other side is that burning the flag infringes upon our rights and it is not allowed. The students are able to burn the flag and they shall not be punished.
Today, it’s hard to imagine the U.S. Constitution without the Bill of Rights. However, when the founding fathers we’re drafting the Constitution they didn’t feel the first ten amendments were necessary. The three men that believed these amendments should be included were, George Mason, Elbridge Gerry, and Edmund Randolph (4). James Madison was responsible for drafting the document and came up with seventeen sections (4). This number then got reduced to twelve, but only ten of those twelve were ratified.
I feel that the US Constitution is somewhat outdated, and is in need of a revision. As everybody knows, the world has changed a lot in the past 250 years. These changes are things like transportation, total number of people in the world, and major things like the internet and technology. The events and problems that the Constitution solved years ago are a lot different than the problems that we face today. However, some of the more universal and basic rules of the constitution should not be subject to change because they still apply to today.
Schnayerson Steel Prof, Weatherill ENG 102 6 March 2023 1984 and Constitutional Rights The second amendment provides Americans with the right keep and bear arms and form a well-regulated militia. Forming a militia could provide the proles and Winson with a place to stay safe to an extent since this could also put them in danger, this is how it reads in the constitution, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state. ” The right to keep and bear arms is to have a gun and to be allowed to carry it, this is how it reads in the constitution, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The second amendment of the United States Bill of Rights is the most beneficial amendment to the people
The second amendment states that well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. This amendment has brought upon debates for control. For many the gun symbolizes crimes, sexual frustration, aggression, violence, and all that is wrong in American culture. For others it symbolizes, manliness, independence, outdoorsmanship, and willingness to die for one's believe (La valle). The debate over Gun Control has peaked in recent years due to societies opposing conflict and a lack of compromise.
When the Framers of the Constitution met in Philadelphia in 1787, they sought to establish a government that would not only satisfy the current needs of the nation and guard against tyranny, but serve as a guide for future generations as well. The Constitution they drafted continues to shape our country and define our government today, but the Framers could not have possibly predicted all future threats to democracy and liberty that would eventually present themselves. Although measures were taken to prevent the concentration of authority from being held by one individual or one group of individuals, such as the creation of separate branches of government that would check the power of one another, the rise of populist demagogues in the last century has raised the question of whether or not the
The Second Amendment (in the constitution) is one that can bring up hours and hours of debate, maybe the most of them all. These debates, unfortunately, will never come to an end because there will be know agreeance in what would be done. In my opinion, what is trying to be done right now is not going to work, the politicians in office right now want to stop the weapons and not the perpetrators. Every time there is a mass shooting/bombing the idea of gun control comes up and it is not going to get us as a nation anywhere because that is not the issue. We know who is doing these mass murders such as the Boston bombings, Paris attacks, San Bernadino shooting, and Brussels attack that happen just this morning, stricter gun laws would not have
The First amendment also protects speech (Hall,2016.) The plain language of the clause, several words mean something different than what is plain (Hall, 2016.) First, the clause limits the authority of Congress, but in reality it limits all three branches of the federal government (Hall, 2016.) Second, the term speech is used (Hall, 2016.) The Supreme Court has held that more than the spoken word is protected (Hall, 2016.)
The First Amendment states that there shall be no law respecting an established religion, preventing the freedom of speech, or preventing the right for people to hold peaceful assemblies. I personally believe that the freedom of speech is the most critical out of the three freedoms. The freedom of speech encompasses all the freedoms in the First Amendment. Without the freedom of speech, there can not be peaceful assemblies or the freedom of religion. All of the freedoms requires the right to freely express opinions.
The first amendment gives us our freedom of religion, freedom to peaceably assemble, freedom of the press, and freedom of speech (Obscenity and Pornography. Cencage). The first amendment counteracts the government from restricting the amount of details and information that is allowed to be shared. With that being said, that does not necessarily mean that there are no limitations. If the outcome is a crime then it is not protected.
Legislatures in the United States continuously attempt to restrict the flow of new forms of entertainment that their constituents believe to be harmful to society. Yet, from the lower courts to supreme courts, contested legislation is overturned. The First Amendment’s assertion of the freedom of speech is afforded the highest standard of judicial review and very few exceptions are allowed. These exceptions to free speech are obscenity, incitement, fighting words, slander and libel. However, while adults enjoy the full extent of the priviledges in the Bill of Rights, minors are viewed as needing special consideration in certain situations.
The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. There are many ideas expressed in times where it would be inappropriate or unnecessary to use one’s freedom of speech. These circumstances would be where something is inappropriate or misidentified as hate speech. There are many situations where someone may want to say something, yet there are times where some things should not be said.
