The author of “ColoradoCare: [sci] Universal healthcare plan has democrats divided” is Josiah Hesse on Friday, May 20, 2016. The article “ColoradoCare” [sci] is slanted towards the supporting side of universal healthcare. The author only mentions democrats by name and hardly says anything about the republicans. However, you can also tell that the article is bias in the sense that he only talks about all of the politicians who are against the universal healthcare.
Developed countries around the world have embraced the universal healthcare, with America being the only exception. Access to healthcare is considered one of the most important things for the progress of a country. However, many people in America consider that the healthcare system in the country is quite inefficient. It is estimated that more than 45 million Americans have no medical insurance.
Why is The United States of America (USA), seen by many as the greatest country in the world to live in employing different standards the only Western country that does not have Universal Healthcare? To answer this question I will be looking into the opportunity cost and possible tradeoffs for free healthcare which is found within the Pros and Cons of a Free Healthcare system. Universal Healthcare remains the most controversial topics/debate in presidential elections in the USA. Politicians and Americans ponder on this day and night. Like education, many believe healthcare should be considered a fundamental right to all USA citizens, not simply a privilege for the upper and middle classes.
People want Healthcare to be free for everyone in the United States. It would release many people from their jobs. In addition, it would cost the Government way to much money. Even if they tax the citizens more, it would just backfire.
Moreover, there are strong financial justifications for universal healthcare. Evidence demonstrates that universal healthcare can result in long-term cost savings for both individuals and the government, dispelling the myth that it is not financially viable. For example, compared to the United States, nations with universal healthcare systems frequently spend less per person on healthcare and get better health outcomes. America may achieve overall cost reduction and increased efficiency by promoting preventative care, negotiating cheaper drug prices, and streamlining administrative costs by implementing a universal healthcare model (Kahn & McDonough, 2018). III.
citizens to have insurance to achieve universal healthcare, there are also a lot of negatives. For instance, it puts the country and people in debt, more than sixty percent of bankruptcies are due to medical costs (Zuber, 2017). This shows that even with insurance, sometimes the cost is still too much to afford. Another disadvantage is the implications and eligibility that you must look at before being able to get an insurance policy. Things like how much you make, where you work, and previous heath conditions could determine the kind of insurance you are eligible for.
Is Universal health care truthfully free and economically justified? The world ought to be able to live as sound a life as they can and be able to cure any of their ailments in the most affordable and effective way possible. However, it is not the responsibility of the taxpayers through the government’s regulation to provide for care they do not receive. Universal health care is ineffective and economically devastating because universal health care is paid by the taxpayers, the quality of health care declines, creates longer wait times, causes more deaths, lowers access to care, costs that are unpaid raises costs for care, makes medical staff public employees, and more governmental regulation. Canada is a primary example of how a single-payer healthcare system would affect the U.S. and its economy.
“Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” are all unalienable rights(Dec. Of Ind.). This phrase does not seem to accommodate those who our capitalistic society deems indigent. Repudiating about 44 million people’s “right” to healthcare and another 38 million people’s “right” to adequate healthcare is a hypocrisy (PBS). Realizing the discrepancy between the ethics of our country and its execution is the point everyone misses.
I know that many people in the United States didn't have health insurance in 2014, therefore; “Obama care” or universal healthcare was created. (Procon) It has created many controversies, due to some supporting universal health care and others not. Proponents for the issue believe everyone has a right to health care, while opponents believe it's not the government's role to issue health care to the public. (Procon) This has been a huge debate with a new presidential election coming up, if the new president would keep the universal health care or demolish it.
For many years, universal health care has been one of the most debated topics in the U.S., and several people disagree with bringing it about. Of course, we could go on and on about how and why we shouldn’t have a universal health care system, rather than why the U.S. should institute universal health care and why it would be beneficial. But what exactly is a universal health care system? It is defined as “Universal health coverage is defined as ensuring that all people have access to needed promotive, preventive, curative and rehabilitative health services, of sufficient quality to be effective, while also ensuring that people do not suffer financial hardship when paying for these services.” by the World Health Organization, WHO.
Main Argument: P1: The costs of health care would decrease if we have universal health care. P2: Universal healthcare needs to be available for everyone just like education is. P3: Having healthcare would allow individuals to get the health care that they so deserve. C:
There are a wide variety of ways this can be done, and almost every developed country has universal healthcare. The United States is an exception. This leads many people to believe that the United States should also have universal healthcare, but a large number of people disagree with that, and believe the US
Most other wealthy and industrialized countries have made significant progress toward having a universal health care system. According to a report from the World Health Organization, “The USA is currently the only high-income country without nearly universal health-care coverage” (Rice et al.). If the US stands out this
As Bernie Sanders once said, “Health care must be recognized as a right, not a privilege.” Most developed countries choose to live by this quote while the United States of America chooses to go against it. Universal health care has benefits on multiple levels, whether it’s a single individual or the people in a whole. The U.S is one of the few developed countries that doesn’t offer universal health care to their people, yet the U.S spends more than seventeen percent of their GDP on health insurance. Many people believe that universal health care is a simple one solution problem, but the truth is that there are multiple forms of universal health care that provide all citizens with the health insurance they need.
Universal health care is a valuable service and should be available in all countries. In many countries millions of people suffer from not having access to healthcare they deserve or not being able to pay for the healthcare they need. In the states alone, an estimated 50 million people do not have insurance because of the inability to pay for it. Universal health care would be beneficial to all countries because it would not exclude anyone from getting the necessary help, it would prevent the insurance companies from denying care, and it would contribute to preventative care to take place.
