ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Wooly Mammoth

442 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The negative effect of hunting

Imagine waking up and seeing a mammoth outside of your window. That would never be possible because mammoths are extinct right? Well now scientists are trying to change that. As amazing as this sounds it could also be a really bad thing. There are a lot of pros and cons but the cons seem to be more prominent. In the following paragraphs I'll be stating why this could be a bad thing and why we should leave what's extinct, extinct.
To begin with Mammoths lived far long ago in different eras and ages. The world as we know it today has changed a lot and is sure not as adaptable as it would be back then. The wooly mammoth lived in what was known as the Ice Age. Many scientists also agree with this statement on how habitats are not the same and chave changes . Biothictic Hank …show more content…

I agree with his statements because such a big animal that not all habitats are used to could disrupt other ecosystems.
Another con would be hunting. In America and in almost all places over the world hunting exists. This is where humans go out and kill animals , whether it's for food , fur , ivory ect. Bringing any animal that was extinct back to life could just result in them being extinct once again. According to the American museum of natural history web page 100-10,000 species go extinct each year. When it comes to hunting according to the “ world animal foundation” alone in the U.S over 100 million animals are hunted and killed each year. This is another reason why bringing such an animal as big or as famous as the wooly mammoth would be in danger of getting hunted and going right back to extinction.
On the contrary, bringing back an extinct animal could be good. According to
Paleontologist Mike Archer “scientistsshouldusebiotechnologytocloseextinct species”.Mike states that this will help increase biodiversity. His reason is “When

Show More
Related
655 Words | 3 Pages

The author fails to make compelling arguments on the environment since he does not use sufficient academic references for his information; and misunderstands the generalization issue. McKitrick

Read More
167 Words | 1 Pages

Societies and cultures such as our own can only advance if we learn from previous mistakes, in this case I am talking about extinct species of wildlife. In the past, people have killed a lot of animals in large numbers as they deemed fit for things that include a stable food source, resource, and to affect other peoples as with the bison. Bolen and Robinson made excellent points on this issue about how Americans waged war on Bison as an attempt to take away the Indian’s food source and how that is why the mighty bison is so scarce today (Bolen and Robinson 10). The bison and other examples in the text are great examples of Europeans overkilling and driving species of animals to extinction for various reasons, but it is very important. If we

Read More
472 Words | 2 Pages

The Angus Mammoth Holen, Steven R., David W. May, and Shannon A. Mahan. 2011 “The Angus Mammoth: A Decades-Old Scientific Controversy Resolved”. American Antiquity 76.3: 487–499. Back in 1931, a mammoth fossil was found by a 15 year old named Earl Brooks in Nuckolls County, Nebraska. An expert was called in from the Hastings museum and he instantly identified the bones as mammoth and started excavating the skeleton.

Read More
1270 Words | 6 Pages

The Unjust Beast Injustice can occur in varying forms, depending on circumstance. Lord of the Flies by William Golding explores this topic, when a group of school-aged boys get stranded on an island with no adult supervision. When the younger boys (littluns) start talking about a beast that attacks at night, it leads the older boys (bigguns) on a search through the jungle to hunt the beast down. Their pursuit to find the beast leads to the bigguns running into conflicts with both themselves and this supposed beast. Through the characters of Ralph and Jack, Golding suggests that self respect can lead an individual to making just or unjust decisions.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

Have you ever wondered what it would be like if animals that were widely known on Earth went extinct? For many years, animals have been in zoos protected from the wildlife outside. Many people when visiting zoos have not thought about the real answer to why animals have been held captive from their natural habitat. Let me tell you why animals should be kept in zoos because it helps endangered species risk extinction and can help people acknowledge the protection animals need.

Read More
426 Words | 2 Pages

Primary candidates include keystone species such as wooly mammoths. It is similar to Frankenstein in the way that they are bringing back the dead, but with different technology. In Frankenstein, the creature is made with body parts, mystical chemicals, and a shock of lightning. In De-Extinction, they are bringing the animals back using cells from remains, creating an egg that is placed within a capable host with hopes that the operation is a

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

For example, science says that they can’t get enough DNA from dinosaurs to be able to bring them back because they only have fossils. Wooly mammoths may be easier because their bodies have been frozen in ice making it easier to take the DNA and put it in elephants. This process can bring animals back that can affect our ecosystems in a very big way. They can also alter the ways of life in those ecosystems. But it could also repopulate areas that low in numbers, a very good thing.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

Should extinct species be brought back to earth? In my opinion I think that de-extinction is a bad idea. Take the wooly mammoth for example, if scientists were to bring it back they could be taking resources away from other species causing them to disappear, humans might try to harm other animals that aren’t extinct, and scientists would have to successfully re-introduce this animal back into the lifestyle they used to have. Although some people believe that de-extinction is a good thing, I strongly disagree because of those three reasons.

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

As stated in “Do elephants belong in zoos?”, zoos not only fund research on wild animals but also contribute to reducing the conflicts between them and people, for example, by planting crops that frighten elephants away and exploring the cases of poaching that could affect their mortality (Cohn 717). Moreover, most of the scientific matter on elephants such as facts about their communications, reproductive physiology and behavior were originally gathered on the ground of captive animals (Cohn 717). In his article, Borrell expresses the same opinion. He states that zoos serve as “a living museum” that help scientists to find necessary information on species for the research, and these facts can be used to prevent the extinction of the animals living in the wild (Borrell 9). Besides, zoos are crucial for raising money for conservation programs by giving people firsthand wildlife experience that increases interest in wild animals (Borrell 9).

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

But, without the money, nothing can happen which will actually make a difference. There is no real proof that it would work out in the end. This could all be for nothing as technology is getting better and better and poachers could still kill endangered animals for their body

Read More
1139 Words | 5 Pages

It would make us soon realize how bad it would be to see animals that are needed, disappear but that will never happen! To continue, “ It will reproduce endangered or even extinct species.” The author is trying to say that, the more species that become extinct, or placed on the endangered list, would really have an effect on the whole world. There will most likely be at least one endangered animal for each continent, most likely by the end of this year, or next year. So, once we are able to clone the animals, certain

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

The WWF has already saved tons of Black Rhinos from southern Africa and Black Bucks in the

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

If zoos were really concerned, they would try to conserve animals in their natural habitat, “the only way to realistically stop extinction is to preserve the world’s habitat and ecosystems,” (Zoos n.p). While zoos may help a bit, there are better ways to help and learn from

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

This leads to many concerns from the public on the physical and mental impacts of captivity on the wild animals. This essay examines the advantages and disadvantages of zoos to lead us to a possible conclusion whether it is ethical to place animals in captivity. We will also examine if zoos have the best possible facilities to keep animals in captivity. Body One of the advantages of having zoos, is to provide protection to some animals that are endangered.

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

A lot of people think that zoos are good because they help repopulate, but no one thought that the only reason why we need to repopulate some species, was because of poaching and hunting. If people never had poaching and hunting, most animals are capable out there in the wild. On the other hand, Zoos have research programs that help expand our knowledge about animals, especially the endangered species. The information gained by these programs can help protect and treat the species in the wild, as well as determine what effects if any climate change may have on the regions needed for the species to flourish. Many zoos also have breeding programs for all kinds of species, endangered or not, and learn even more about the species during the breeding, and rearing process.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Wooly Mammoth

Related Topics

Open Document