ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Torture

611 Words3 Pages

Torture can be defined as, ‘the officially sanctioned infliction of intense suffering, aimed at forcing someone to do or say something against his or her will.’ Thus we should understand that this humane exercise should be stopped, and is unacceptable. Torture is cruel, it causes mental stress for the victim, and it leads to the distribution of false information.

Amnesty International, which is a non-governmental organisation focused on human rights around the world, received reports of torture or cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment in more than 150 countries during the four-year period from 1997 to 2000.
Surveys of torture survivors reveal that torture “is not aimed primarily at the extraction of information. Its real aim is to break down the victim’s personality and identity.” Torture is used as a tool of repression against conflict and community empowerment. Torture has been occurring for centuries, but we live in a world where we think of ourselves as highly advanced, not only technologically but …show more content…

The first thing that comes to mind when thinking of torture is unendurable pain, but this physical pain remains in the torture chamber. The physical after effects are appalling, but the real repulsion is what remains in the mind.

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) occurs in most torture sufferers. The main problem affecting these victims is depression. Some victims experience prevalent chronic pain for years after the incident. They may also undergo social withdraw and insomnia. Torture victims may often end up taking their own lives because of the experiences they have undergone.

A man part of the United States Extraordinary Rendition programme claimed that, under torture, he eventually confessed to whatever was demanded. This is proof that torturers will keep on going until they hear what they want to, even if it is

Show More
Related
1694 Words | 7 Pages

Many have said that they would want nonlethal torture to be used in such cases but “did not want torture to be officially recognized by our legal system.” Similar statements have posited that while “torture might be necessary in a given situation it could never be right.” This approach, that of keeping torture off-the-books, is in direct conflict with the necessity for accountability and transparency in a democracy. A democracy cannot work if the public is kept in the dark. The public must know what is going on in order to approve or disapprove.

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

According to the Tenth Amendment of the constitution, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”. There have been moments in history where Congress has implemented laws that states felt were unconstitutional. The Constitution gave states the ability to counter the federal government’s power through the Judiciary branch of government, when they feel a law is unconstitutional. The Founders of our nation gave Congress enumerated powers to pass legislation that needs to be abided by all states and citizens. At times Congress will overstep its powers by enacting laws that are unconstitutional and the states have the right to challenge those powers.

Read More
1032 Words | 5 Pages

2016). Using this ethical framework to argue against torture, one needs to consider the violation of the terrorist’s rights. Utilitarians argue that under a scenario where thousands of people are in danger, the well-being of the larger community is more important than neglecting the rights of a single individual (Krauthammer 2005). The simple idea of taking away a person’s autonomy for the sake of others violates rights ethics. To comprehend the violation upon the victim’s rights, it is important to understand how torture feels, “Brian describes his body as having become an object… pain is the central reality; it dominates experience and expression (Wisnewski 2010, 81).”

Read More
957 Words | 4 Pages

The prevalent use of torture in such settings conveys a common

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

It is revealed by Luban & Shue (2011) that punishment practices, law enforcement abuses and interrogation methods might be labeled as torture in the United States. However, during the real application, although the physical torture is few, the definition of “severe mental pain or suffering” is confused and falsified to avoid the repression and prosecution of mental torture (Luban & Shue, 2011). Many victims suffer from this kind of psychological torture is difficult to prove and often bring serious consequence, such as PTSD. In this case, incarceration not only fail to reduce the recidivism rate, but also leads to more severe

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

Web. 08 Feb. 2016. In this report the author explain that many CIA agents believe that physical torture is not as effective as psychological torture. For example, leaving them naked in front of other people will

Read More
626 Words | 3 Pages

Standards of international law require countries to refrain from using torture. Torture can sometimes bring about right information, but usually the information is mixed with false or incomplete in purpose. The author also arguments that even if the information is accurate, there are no curranty that the information could have been obtained without torture. Because torture is usually done in secret, there is no direct research on the matter. Nevertheless the criminal justice system offers evidence that from different studies (f.e. DNA analysis later revealed false confessions) can be found that as the coerciveness increases, so does the probability of false confessions.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

Torture has been a real hot button issue in the United States. Torture is illegal according to the Geneva Convention, however it is not always enforced. In January 2002, shortly after the destruction of the Twin Tower on September 11, 2001, the United States Naval Base began holding prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. Since 2005, psychologists have been involved in the torture process. Their main objective is supposed to be caring for the well being of the victims and ensuring their mental well-being.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

Torture cannot be justified, even at the cost of forbidding the use of torture in rare cases that involve obtaining information in which it might be morally justified. This is because the information and the technique itself is inaccurate and unreliable. Martin Robbins makes a strong argument on how torture doesn’t work in the text “Does Torture Work?”. Robbins points out that when one is in extreme pain, they will say anything that the “interrogator wants to hear” and make up lies “to get the pain to stop” (Robbins 1). Thus, this technique yields unreliable results.

Read More
925 Words | 4 Pages

There are many ways people can be tortured such as starvation, beatings, humiliation, and enslavement to name a few.

Read More
1423 Words | 6 Pages

Who just like you and I were living a normal life but one day they were captured and next thing you know they're in a interrogation room. All of those men have experienced torture at some point of being detained in guantanamo bay. Torture can be sexually, mentally, physically. All the detainees have experienced

Read More
1435 Words | 6 Pages

In this situation only the terrorist and God knows the objective truth. The person being tortured could easily say or do something that will get the torturers to stop inflicting pain on the detainee. Moreover, there are various gray areas in the claim that torture is an okay thing to

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

Torture is a lot of things, but when an individual is rethinking their beliefs, that is when damage has been successful to the extremes. One may be tortured until they abandon their own views and beliefs in order to adapt to those of their torturer. They have not only been beaten as well as abused, but the torturers will find a way to get inside the heads of their victims, messing with their mindset. They then become just another means to support the regime of the torturer.

Read More
588 Words | 3 Pages

Hollywood movies usually show villains, terrorists, and criminals as totally corrupt and negative characters, whom main protagonists usually murder “in the name of justice.” Perhaps, considering the amount of damage a victim (or their relatives) might have suffered from hostile actions, simply placing an offender under custody (with further imprisonment) does not look an adequate penalty in a number of cases. In connection to this, some people raise questions about the expediency of using the death penalty or torture as a punishment for severe crimes. And while capital punishment is a norm in a number of American states (as well as in countries around the world), the propriety of tortures is a much more debated question. Today, torture is rightly seen as a medieval and inhumane way of treating a human being, regardless of its origin, social status, or any crimes committed.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

Torture is universally prohibited in both national and International law worldwide. It is a fundamental violation of human rights that cannot be derogated from. Essentially, torture is said to constitute any physical and mental act by which severe pain or suffering is intentionally inflicted upon a person ( UNCAT).Torture is mainly used for purposes that are set out to degraded, embarrass, and induce destruction in the person being subjected to torture and those in close relation to the person being tortured .Torture is a mechanism used by those in authoritative positions to preserve themselves in power (Power, 2006:2). Despite the universal prohibition on torture, its use has been widespread throughout history, and especially of late in the wake of September 11 2001 and other recent terrorist atrocities to combat the aforementioned heinous terrorist attacks.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Torture

Related Topics

Open Document