Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
The concept of the american dream
Achieving american dream
Diversity in the us
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The concept of the american dream
Achieving american dream
Diversity in the us
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Back in the early days of independant America there had been an ethical dilemma on whether or not they should ratify The U.S constitution. The main two arguments were whether citizens chose to maintain the status quo, or switch to a more centralized government. The two debates were backed up by James madison who wrote the Federalist No.10 for ratification and Patrick Henry who gave a speech against it. In the document James warns about how “there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party, or an obnoxious individual.” referring to someone or a group of people who could possibly create unique factions between on another and disrupt a potential republic.
When the new constitution was put into effect in 1789, the federal government was actually given power and had more of a say in society. The constitution gave the federal government powers, and limited that states’ powers. There are two amendments in the constitution that explains what the federal and state governments have the right to do. The tenth and the fourteenth amendment lay down the line for what the states can do and not do. Even though the federal government tells them what to do through the constitution, they give them rights as well.
Article Five of the United States Constitution clearly spells out ways to amend the document as so desired by Congress or the States. Regarding this specific topic, there have been recent debates over whether there should be a Constitutional Convention comprised of state legislatures developed for the sole purpose of bypassing congress in amending the Constitution. Before I watched the debate, I decided against this notion as I personally do not have any knowledge, presently, of how to amend the constitution. Therefore, there should not be a convention to do just that. Although the opposing side brought some real issues to light regarding the ideas of “Draining the Swamp”, using “True Democracy” for one person equals one vote/one state equals one vote, and stating that re-electing new congressional officials hasn’t changed anything either.
The Bill of Rights was introduced into America's system of government along with the Constitution in order to appease Anti-Federalists that wanted to ensure the protection of their rights. The 14th Amendment was later added to guarantee due process and equal protection rights. The Bill of Rights and 14th Amendment are extremely effective in protecting the rights of all citizens and are most clearly shown in the 1st, 5th, and 6th Amendments. The full expanse of the 1st Amendment and the freedoms it provides have been debated since its implementation, but its involvement in Texas v. Johnson was a key step in setting the proper precedent for its use.
Many people can not offer their children good lives except from the USA. Dr. Argle received a letter from a father from Africa. The letter stated that the most helpful thing the father could do for his children is have them be US citizens. The US offers many more safety nets and protection than other countries. Also, there were no immigration laws at the time of this amendments creation because it has always been fact that the US was a home for the persecuted and poor.
With twenty-seven amendments in existence, each broadens protections that were not previously covered. Within these twenty-seven are several major ones that strongly influence the dynamic in which Americans vote. The fourteenth and nineteenth coexist in a manner that allows them both to strongly control who votes, and how. Ratified on July 9, 1868, the fourteenth amendment expanded citizenship to all born on U.S. soil and sought to expand national rights to all, regardless of race (Fourteenth). This amendment included the expansion of citizenship to anyone truly born in the U.S., regardless of who their ancestors were-granting citizenship to former slaves.
There are always certain issues they may arise when going over the Constitution of the United States, we can find matters that can be outdated, or times have changed a bit as years go by. The 14th Amendment was not initially about education but it did have quite an impact when the Supreme Court addressed the “Brown v. Board of Education” (1954) case declaring school segregation is illegal. The 14th Amendment makes it clear it prevents,” any persons within its jurisdiction of the equal protection of the laws.” That all American citizen must be treated equally by law which we had become aware of but with Plyer v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982)
The Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution which states that all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. This constitutional amendment provides to all eligible person to become an American regarding their race, religion or social class, but the person must be born or naturalized. All children, of foreign person, born in America is enough reason to be a citizen of the United Stated, because it is the right this country give them. All foreign people have this privilege when they come to American the legal way. The Fourteenth amendment is a right that a foreigner has gain because he or she has done everything
Looking back on American History America as a whole has come a long way from the wealthy white dominate patriarchy society it once was. In today's society everyone has a set of civil liberties that protect their rights as an American citizen, but this is not always true when it comes to voting. According to the fourteenth amendment " The states [have] the authority to deny voting rights to anyone that has a criminal conviction" (Pilipinas School Net 2016). Texas just happens to be one of those states that implements that fourteenth amendment towards convicted felons.
Most immigrants were captivated by America when it gained more territories. However, when the United States divided into two confederations, they were required to join the
According to ArticleⅡ, SectionⅠ, Clause Ⅴ, of the Constitution, a person must be a natural-born citizen to be eligible become president. However, many people from other countries have had the qualities and experience necessary to become president, yet they have been hindered from doing so by this foolish provision. Clearly, this is not right. I believe you do not need to be born on US soil, to become president for the following reasons: (1) many people misconceive the meaning of the word natural-born citizen,(2) many people from foreign countries have helped America in many ways,(3) most other countries do not have similar qualifications Firstly, many people misconceive the meaning of the word, natural-born citizen. According to an article by the Harvard Law Review, the word natural-born citizen actually means that a natural-born citizen is someone who has been given birth to by a parent who is a citizen of the United States regardless of where he or she is born, without going through the naturalization process.
The 14th Amendment was a milestone in the United States history. It is the sole amendment that keeps our people and their rights together. The rights of the people are a major aspect to keeping the American society going in a positive direction. With no rights, the government of the United States would be purely communism with one leader giving all of the orders. In most cases, history has proven that way of running your society is not the most successful way of doing things.
Arguments for amending the constitution: For decades the people of Catalonia and other autonomous communities in Spain have fought for independence and the right to hold a referendum on the subject. This would hold many implications for Spain and the European union. These would be beneficial to Spain as the rest of the peninsula would not have to cater for the need of groups who culturally identify as non-spanish. This means that there would be no parliamentary quota of MPs from communities that have no interest in the rest of Spain. The European union would also benefit as the current financial success of Catalonia would strengthen Europe’s economy.
In book VII chapter I, right out of the gate, we see a very broad statement “Those who live under the constitution that is best for those in their circumstances will have the best way of life.” (pg 251) In essence this points that the circumstances of people must arise before the constitution does. Meaning also that a constitution must promote the happiness of the majority, for the majority must come up with the constitution lest more than fifty percent of the people fall into dissent. In theory, if this is the case, then the forming of the constitution must be the final product of a city, people must already have found what makes them happy and/or the life they desire, are agreement therein, and decided on a constitution that is
The meeting that I attended this week was Narcotics Anonymous (NA). NA is a fellowship that includes men and women who struggle with addiction. The members of the group are supporters or recovering addicts, and the purpose is to maintain complete abstinence (Narcotics Anonymous, 2017). Prior to attending the group, I was not informed about the group and was uncertain of what to be expected. Unfortunately, the night that I attended was not a traditional session, as they were celebrating the milestones of a few members.