The Pros And Cons Of US Foreign Policy

1239 Words5 Pages

"Peace is not the absence of conflict, it is the ability to handle conflict by peaceful means,” alleged Ronald Reagan, 40th president of the United States. (West, USIP) When it was still a nascent country, America began to create agencies whose sole task was to facilitate peace with other countries and governments. The largest of these agencies is the United States Foreign
Service. The Foreign Service created in 1924, is “vitally important to America--
{in} our security, our economy, {and} our diplomacy.” (Inside a U.S Embassy) As America’s market grew, she expanded her interactions and became involved in geopolitical systems and transactions. As a result of these trade transactions, she made many treaties with exporting countries, such as …show more content…

This gives the country a dangerous position of power over America, and it will likely dissolve the alliance unless America discontinues her alliance with the Kurds.

The U.S Foreign Service has placed themselves in a difficult situation with Turkey.
Contemporary Turkey and America “share neither values nor interests.” (Cook, Steven A.
Politico.) In allying with both the Turks and the Kurds, they have made enemies with both.
America attempted amends in January, as Secretary of State Rex Tillerson acquiesced to
“Turkey’s legitimate security concerns” but also agreed with the “multiethnic group of fighters who are defending their home territory” inside Syria. (Remarks With United Kingdom Foreign
Secretary) The constant vacillation between two of America’s strategic allies is causing doubts.
The Foreign Service and other diplomats should make one decision and stand by it.

Conversely, in terms of success, Japan offers an example of success for novice diplomats to emulate. The Foreign Service in Japan was not only forced to deal with America’s animosity towards Japan, but as a nation, Japan’s humiliation on being forced to rely, economically