ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of US Foreign Aid

1604 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Advantages of foreign aid

The left side of the political ideological spectrum is more supportive of U.S. foreign aid. The left side supports the aid of disadvantaged countries because it helps strengthens alliances with other countries and it conveys the U.S. as a benevolent country. They also support the position that foreign aid does work. For example, public health, one of the most successful forms of aid that has had the “greatest breakthroughs” in aid. “The approach of increased aid that is well targeted through innovative institutions has been enormously successful in improving public health in low income countries”. One prime example of this is conflict faced against malaria in the early 21st century. In 2000 malaria became the focus of the global aid debate, and researches started to discover ways to stop and prevent the spread of malaria. But most countries that had an issue with the disease were third world countries, they couldn’t afford to buy these methods to prevent malaria, which led to massive amounts of deaths. “Governments of low income African countries needed donor support for the scale-up effort…” And so later WHO (world health organization) reinforced and contributed to the mass free distributions of bed nets throughout sub- Saharan Africa which proved overwhelming results of a 51% drop in deaths caused by malaria. This all happened with the help of foreign aid and contributions. This is …show more content…

They are cautious to change and are not sure if human reasoning is capable of solving socio-economical problems. Their core values such as free market and elitism support their position on being against U.S. foreign aid because they believe in benefitting our country more before others and that it is not our country’s responsibility to fix other countries problems before our own, so in result we shouldn’t take out loans to help other countries and bury ourselves into more

Show More
Related
253 Words | 2 Pages

Why did Sir John Davies only criticize the inability of Irish people themselves rather than England’s imperial colonization method in explaining why Ireland was never subdued? Why doesn't Davies see a fault in the approach? In the beginning Davies brings up a “defect that hindered” was that “a barbarous country must first be broken by a war before it will be capable of good government; and when it is fully subdued and conquered, if it be not well planted and governed after the conquest it will soon return to the former barbarism.” Davies claimed that the Irish were “like wild fruit trees” in their old traditions to become one with England. When I read the document I expected details such as military faults in leadership and strategy, but it

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

If the 2016 U.S. presidential election has taught the world anything, it is that where the United States is concerned, so is the rest of the world. The U.S. has been, and continues be, seen as one of the most powerful countries in the entire world. Henceforth, a highly controversial discussion for debate would be over whether, when regarding American Imperialism, if it is positive or negative. When looking at it from an international standpoint, the era may not have been considered “humane”, so to speak. The U.S. had already been the most powerful country of this era.

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

One example is a large non-governmental organization by the name of Medecins Sans Frontieres. The organization is one that delivers medical aid to different countries. They have helped over seventy countries total. Medecins Sans Frontieres wanted to open a feeding center for Ethiopia but were rejected by Ethiopian authorities. Kelala, a region in Ethiopia had more than six thousand children suffering from serious malnutrition.

Read More
1664 Words | 7 Pages

“In a moment of decision the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing.” Those are some wise words said by the President during WWII…. Pres. Franklin Delano Roosevelt. This quote can relate to a plethora of issues, when one may have to make an impossible choice and one does not know what to do.

Read More
1764 Words | 8 Pages

As America became a great power, it has continued its legacy of territorial expansionism through neo-imperialist policies. Aside from acquiring land and expanding American territory, the United States has established policies that have allowed direct and often indirect military and political control, economic exploitation, and the introduction of American ideals. The U.S. has justified this form of colonialism by claiming that it is for mutual economic pursuits, the spreading of democracy, and the establishment of stable governments in developing countries. Despite America’s noble causes, American imperialism has caused many repercussions. The United States should cease to be an imperialist power as it is economically damaging to countries under its rule, costly to America, violates the fundamental American principle of self-governance, and exacerbates social and political situations in countries America has tampered with.

Read More
634 Words | 3 Pages

With the help of modern technologies and an aid in the expansion of European empires was a desired effect of imperialism. US imperialism was meant to “help” and “rebuild” the US, but as with anything else, there came obstacles. So the question is, was imperialism beneficial or non beneficial? Imperialism is the policy in which stronger nations extend their economic, political, or military control over weaker territories. Imperialism has its pros and cons and its advantages and disadvantages.

Read More
411 Words | 2 Pages

In both cases the community or world as a whole must step in before things get too bad and stop both wars and contentions before they end up too widespread and large of a problem to fix. Basically, both war and contagions become very hard to overthrow once they effect a certain amount of people and spread to a certain amount of land. Both can not be escaped by indifference to the problem or hiding from it, these solutions work for a little while until the problems are too big to contain, and then it 's too late. People in the position to help would benefit more from stepping in and stopping both a war or a contagion right ways because not only does it cost less money but cost less lives if a smaller power is taken out before it can become large scale and

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

“Over the last decade, Canada has been a diminishing actor in foreign aid, with spending falling to $4.2 billion in 2014, down from $5.6 billion two years earlier, ” states Jim Coyle, a valid journalist from the Toronto Star. Canada scored in the bottom half of the rankings in a global survey of foreign aid spending that has been released recently. Now that we have switched to a liberal government, they stated that they would restore Canada’s status as an “engaged player on the world’s stage” meaning that we would have to increase our aid spending. Secondly, our aid budget is

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

What Are the Pros and Cons of Military Spending? As the US economy tanked, the banks have been bailing out and the country losing its jobs, its military spending has continued to grow. For the past years, it is recorded to have increased more than 100%, which is very high compared to the height of Ronald Reagan’s presidency and the Cold War. The money allocated for the defense budget is used to purchase sophisticated weapons that often do not make it into production, but when they do, they are just too expensive to maintain.

Read More
234 Words | 1 Pages

Once said by William Cobbett, “It is by attempting to reach the top at a single leap that so much misery is caused in the world.” This quote states that with too much ambition come consequences. In order to be successful, one does not have to make abrupt choices that one believes will result in success. Instead, one should take small steps with caution in order to ensure the reaching of a goal. American imperialism is done with great ambition that can at times result in disaster, just as the quote states.

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

After the end of World War 1 in 1918, the US declared a policy of isolationism. Isolationism is a policy of non-involvement in other countries conflicts and politics and specifically for the US, non-involvement in European affairs. The US implemented this policy by denying the Treaty of Versailles in a vote of 39 to 55 in the Senate and consequently, did not join the League of Nations. This policy brought with it both positive and negative effects on the US. One positive effect is with isolation, the US can avoid the costs of dealing with conflicts in Europe and can avoid the negative effects on citizens.

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

Also, the money that was supposed to be put into American programs,

Read More
347 Words | 2 Pages

In 2012, they reported tracking 15 sharks within the ocean. Co-founders Nathan and David Garrison created the Sharkbanz. The bracelet sends magnetic waves to deter the sharks from a field of 3-6ft. It can prevent the most common shark attacks, hit and run for swimmers, surfers and others. It has been tested on Bull, Nurse, Lemon, Whitetip, Blacktip, Caribbean Reef, Bonnethead, and small Tiger sharks(sharkbanz.com).

Read More
1179 Words | 5 Pages

This is because the United States government is so large, it is virtually impossible to track all of the various federal agencies’ programs across countries and sectors to pinpoint the exact number or amount of assistance their government provides, in terms of the citizens’ taxpayer dollars going to foreign government, or even just their militaries. However, we can focus on the three main programs where military funding is allocated, namely foreign military financing(FMF), peacekeeping operations(PKO), and the International Military Education and Training Program(IMET). In foreign military financing, some of their objectives include to improve the military capabilities of key friendly countries to contribute to international crisis response operations, including peacekeeping and humanitarian crises, to promote bilateral, regional and multilateral coalition efforts, notably in the global war of terrorism and to assist the militaries of friendly countries and allies to procure U.S defense articles and services that strengthen legitimate self-defense capabilities and security needs. FMF is vital to supporting U.S coalition partners in the war on terrorism. It promotes U.S national security by strengthening military support for democratically-elected governments, contributing to regional and global stability, and containing

Read More
735 Words | 3 Pages

Since abortion was made legal by Wade Vs. Roe in 1973, 57 million unborn children have been massacred. Take that in for a second. Somewhere around the amount Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler killed combined. 57 million children who never got to become the people that they were meant to be.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of US Foreign Aid

Related Topics

Open Document